Distributed Lyapunov-Based MPC

  • R. HermansEmail author
  • M. Lazar
  • A. Jokić
Part of the Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering book series (ISCA, volume 69)


We provide an almost decentralized solution to the problem of stabilizing a network of discrete-time nonlinear systems with coupled dynamics that are subject to local state/input constraints. By “almost decentralized” we mean that each local controller is allowed to use the states of neighboring systems for feedback, whereas it is not permitted to employ iterations between the systems in the network to compute the control action. The controller synthesis method used in this work is Lyapunov-based model predictive control. The closed-loop stability conditions are decentralized via a set of structured control Lyapunov functions (CLFs) for which the maximum over all the functions in the set is a CLF for the global network of systems. However, this does not necessarily imply that each function is a CLF for its corresponding subsystem. Additionally, a solution is provided for relaxing the temporal monotonicity of the network-wide CLF. For infinity-norm based structured CLFs and input-affine dynamics, we show that the decentralized MPC algorithm can be implemented by solving a single linear program in each network node. Two application examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the developed theory and to show that the proposed method can perform as well as more complex distributed, iteration-based MPC algorithms.



This research is supported by the Veni grant “Flexible Lyapunov Functions for Real-time Control”, grant number 10230, awarded by STW (Dutch Science Foundation) and NWO (The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research), and is part of the EOS-LT Regelduurzaam project (funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs) and the European Commission Research Project FP7–ICT–249096 “Price-based Control of Electrical Power Systems” (E-Price).


  1. 1.
    A. Bemporad, A predictive controller with artificial Lyapunov function for linear systems with input/state constraints. Automatica 34(10), 1255–1260 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Camponogara, D. Jia, B.H. Krogh, S. Talukdar, Distributed model predictive control. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 22(1), 44–52 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.M. Hermans, A. Jokić, M. Lazar, A. Alessio, P.P.J. van den Bosch, I.A. Hiskens, A. Bemporad, Assessment of non-centralised model predictive control techniques for electrical power networks. Int. J. Control 85(8), 1162–1177 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.M. Hermans, M. Lazar, A. Jokić, Almost decentralized Lyapunov-based nonlinear model predictive control, in 29th American Control Conference (Baltimore, MD, 2010), pp. 3932–3938Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.M. Hermans, M. Lazar, A. Jokić, Distributed predictive control of the 7-machine CIGRÉ power system, in 30th American Control Conference(San Francisco, CA, 2011), pp. 5225–5230Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Jokić, M. Lazar, On decentralized stabilisation of discrete-time nonlinear systems. In 28th American Control Conference (St. Louis, MO, 2009), pp. 5777–5782Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.M. Kellett, A.R. Teel, On the robustness of \(\cal KL\)-stability for difference inclusions: smooth discrete-time Lyapunov functions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 44(3), 777–800 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Lazar, W.P.M.H. Heemels, S. Weiland, A. Bemporad, Stabilizing model predictive control of hybrid systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 51(11), 1813–1818 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Liu, H.J. Marquez, Uniform stability of discrete delay systems and synchronization of discrete delay dynamical networks via Razumikhin technique. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Regul. Pap. 55(9), 2795–2805 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Liu, D. Muñoz de la Peña, P.D. Christofides, J.F. Davis, Lyapunov-based model predictive control of nonlinear systems subject to time-varying measurement delays. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 23(8), 788–807 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.Q. Mayne, J.B. Rawlings, C.V. Rao, P.O.M. Scokaert, Constrained model predictive control: stability and optimality. Automatica 36(6), 789–814 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.M. Raimondo, P. Hokayem, J. Lygeros, M. Morari, An iterative decentralized MPC algorithm for large-scale nonlinear systems, in Proceedings of the 1st IFAC Workshop on Estimation and Control of Networked Systems (Venice, Italy, 2009), pp. 162–167Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Richards, J.P. How, Robust distributed model predictive control. Int. J. Control 80(9), 1517–1531 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.D. Sontag, A Lyapunov-like characterization of asymptotic controllability. SIAM J. Control Optim. 21, 462–471 (1983)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.N. Venkat, I.A. Hiskens, J.B. Rawlings, S.J. Wright, Distributed MPC strategies with application to power system automatic generation control. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 16(6), 1192–1206 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval ArchitectureUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations