Advertisement

Distributed Optimization for MPC of Linear Dynamic Networks

  • E. CamponogaraEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering book series (ISCA, volume 69)

Abstract

This chapter presents existing models and distributed optimization algorithms for model predictive control (MPC) of linear dynamic networks (LDNs). The models consist of networks of subsystems with deterministic and uncertain dynamics subject to local and coupling constraints on the control and output signals. The distributed optimization algorithms are based on gradient-projection, subgradient, interior-point, and dual strategies that depend on the nature of the couplings and constraints of the underlying networks. The focus will be on a class of LDNs in which the dynamics of the subsystems are influenced by the control signals of the upstream subsystems with constraints on state and control variables. A distributed gradient-based algorithm is presented for implementing an interior-point method distributively with a network of agents, one for each subsystem.

Keywords

Control Signal Model Predictive Control Coupling Constraint Subgradient Algorithm Model Predictive Control Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brazil.

References

  1. 1.
    D.P. Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA, 1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Boyd, L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Camponogara, L.B. de Oliveira, Distributed optimization for model predictive control of linear dynamic networks. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A 39(6), 1331–1338 (2009).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Camponogara, M.L. Lima, Distributed optimization for MPC of linear networks with uncertain dynamics. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 57(3), 804–809 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Camponogara, H.F. Scherer, Distributed optimization for model predictive control of linear dynamic networks with control-input and output constraints. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 8(1), 233–242 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Camponogara, S.N. Talukdar, Designing communication networks to decompose network control problems. INFORMS J. Comput. 17(2), 207–223 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Camponogara, H. Zhou, S.N. Talukdar, Altruistic agents in uncertain, dynamic games. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 45(4), 536–552 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L.B. de Oliveira, E. Camponogara, Multi-agent model predictive control of signaling split in urban traffic networks. Transp. Res. Part C 18(1), 120–139 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Diakaki, M. Papageorgiou, K. Aboudolas, A multivariable regulator approach to traffic-responsive network-wide signal control. Control Eng. Pract. 10(2), 183–195 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Necoara, V. Nedelcu, I. Dumitrache, Parallel and distributed optimization methods for estimation and control in networks. J. Process Control 21, 756–766 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.R. Negenborn, B. De Schutter, J. Hellendoorn, Multi-agent model predictive control for transportation networks: serial versus parallel schemes. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 21(3), 353–366 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H.F. Scherer, E. Camponogara, A. Codas, Transfer function modeling of linear dynamic networks for distributed MPC, in Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Conference on Automation Science and, Engineering, pp. 613–618, 2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F.A. Souza, V.B. Peccin, E. Camponogara, Distributed model predictive control applied to urban traffic networks: implementation, experimentation, and analysis, in Proceedings of the 6th IEEE Conference on Automation Science and, Engineering, pp. 399–405, 2010.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.N. Venkat, I.A. Hiskens, J.B. Rawlings, S.J. Wright, Distributed MPC strategies with application to power system automatic generation control. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 16(6), 1192–1206 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Zhu, S. Martínez, On distributed convex optimization under inequality and equality constraints. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 57(1), 151–164 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Automation and Systems EngineeringFederal University of Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations