Abstract
Chapter 6 provides results from the ScotSPRinG extension to the original SPRinG studies (presented in Chaps. 4 and 5). Before beginning the ScotSPRinG study, Tolmie and colleagues had the benefit of reviewing early SPRinG results and on this basis posed a number of associated research questions: would SPRinG transfer to contexts outside of England, and would the programme be similarly effective in urban and rural schools as well as single- and mixed-aged classes? The ScotSPRinG design varied slightly from SPRinG in timescale, and included some additional instruments to assess classroom relationships (concerning work and play) among children and types of collaborative talk used within groups. The study was undertaken with 24 Experimental classes (575 children) and 3 Control classes (78 children) and focused on science lessons similar to those described in Chap. 5. Comparison with Control classes showed ScotSPRinG children exhibited significant increases in science knowledge. They also showed increased use of propositions and explanations in their science discussions and increased positive perceptions of classmates as both work and play partners. Attainment was also related to children’s increased use of propositions and explanations. Though dialogue of this type was productive for learning, it also created tensions between group members. However, improvements in children’s group work skills offset these tensions and le to better social relationships. ScotSPRinG teachers varied to some extent in their take up of the SPRinG principles and where teachers were most effective in their support for group work children showed most progress in science attainment. The positive effects of the ScotSPRinG intervention were strikingly consistent across urban and rural classes and across single- and mixed-age classes—showing that the SPRinG programme can be successfully undertaken in different educational contexts. As in Chap. 4, the authors conclude that the inclusion of initial relational skills training at the start of the school year is likely to provide an important basis for further, cyclic group work developments through the rest of the year.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Partial eta squared is an effect size statistic which estimates the variance explained by an effect relative to the combined value of that effect and the unexplained or residual variance.
References
Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogue, and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2, 202–221.
Baines, E., Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Chowne, A., Ota, C., & Berdondini, L. (2009). Promoting effective groupwork in primary schools: Developing relationships to enhance learning and inclusion: A guide for teachers. London: Routledge.
Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–395.
Blatchford, P., & Baines, E. (2010). Peer relations in school. In K. Littleton, C. Wood & K. Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education. Bingley: Emerald.
Brofenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Darling, J. (1999). Scottish primary education: Philosophy and practice. In T. G. K. Bryce & W. M. Humes (Eds.), Scottish education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Foot, H. C., Shute, R. J., Morgan, M. J., & Barron, A. (1990). Theoretical issues in peer tutoring. In H. C. Foot, M. J. Morgan & R. J. Shute (Eds.), Children helping children. Chichester: Wiley.
Howe, C. J., & Tolmie, A. (1998). Productive interaction in the context of computer-supported collaborative learning in science. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction. London: Routledge.
Howe, C. J., Tolmie, A., Duchak-Tanner, V., & Rattray, C. (2000). Hypothesis testing in science: group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 361–391.
Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Pellegrini, A., & Blatchford, P. (2000). Children’s interactions at school: Peers and teachers. London: Edward Arnold.
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral development of the child. London: Routledge.
Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L.-J., Clark, A.-M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: a dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29–48.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shapira, A., & Madsen, M. C. (1969). Cooperative and competitive behaviour of kibbutz and urban children in Israel. Child Development, 4, 609–617.
Tolmie, A., Thomson, J. A., Foot, H. C., Whelan, K., Morrison, S., & McLaren, B. (2005). The effects of adult guidance and peer discussion on the development of children’s representations: Evidence from the training of pedestrian skills. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 181–204.
Topping, K. J. (2003). Collaborative learning evaluation form. Dundee: Centre for Peer Learning, University of Dundee. http://www.dundee.ac.uk/fedsoc/CLEF.htm. Accessed 1 Aug 2005.
Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. (Eds.). (1998). Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tolmie, A. (2014). ScotSPRinG: The Effects of Group Work in Scottish Primary Schools on Attainment, Interaction and Classroom Relationships. In: Effective Group Work in Primary School Classrooms. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6991-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6991-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6990-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6991-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)