Skip to main content

Groups and Classrooms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The aim of Chap. 2 is to review studies of the classroom as a general and social pedagogic context for learning in primary schools. This review begins with a few premises, namely that: during the majority of time that children spend in their classrooms, they are found in some form of peer-based group; cognitive and other learning practices are intimately connected to the child’s interactions with teachers and peers; and there are a number of experimental and naturalistic studies that provide evidence of effective and ineffective learning in classroom groups. Experimental studies usually draw upon co-operative and collaborative learning theories and show some positive effects for learning. But experimental studies do not necessarily draw information from the whole class or consider effects for all of the children in a class. Co-operative and collaborative learning studies show how social contexts can be set up to promote active (mainly cognitive) and interactive learning by children especially with regard to children’s collaborative talk. Naturalistic studies, on the other hand, focus on the whole class and have shown how learning opportunities may be hindered by social contexts found in classrooms. Groups of children are rarely asked to collaborate, cognitive learning tasks tend to be connected to teacher-child interaction and do not develop opportunities for peer-based learning. Children are rarely taught to work effectively within groups. ‘Classroom mapping’ studies are used to identify basic considerations for the understanding of a social pedagogy of classroom learning that include: the size and composition of pupil groups, interaction and working arrangements for groups, types of learning task and curricular constraints, and the role of the teacher is setting-up and working within the classroom environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Year levels in English primary schools include: Reception (children aged 4–5 years old); Year 1 (children aged 5–6); Year 2 (children aged 6–7); Year 3 (children aged 7–8); Year 4 (children aged 8–9); Year 5 (children aged 9–10) and Year 6 (children aged 10–11). For ease of reporting, we will refer to Year level through this and successive chapters.

  2. 2.

    We also note that children spend proportions of their time as a whole class (storytime) and some children worked as individuals. The small, teacher-oriented group and paired peer-oriented group were most characteristic of classroom learning time.

  3. 3.

    Once pupils were identified with special educational needs, there was an increased likelihood that a teaching assistant would be assigned to the child. That adult’s role would, most likely, be focused on the SEN child only or the group in which the SEN child was working (see Blatchford et al. 2012).

References

  • Adey, P., Robertson, A., & Venville, G. (2002). Effects of a cognitive acceleration programme on year 1 pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. (1981). Competitive versus cooperative reward structures: The influence of individual and group performance factors on achievement attributions and affect. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Chang, J., Waggoner, M., & Yi, H. (1997). On the logical integrity of children’s arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 15(2), 135–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines, E. (2012). Grouping pupils by ability. In P. Adey & J. Dillon (Eds.), Bad education: Debunking myths in education. Maidenhead: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Kutnick, P. (2003). Changes in grouping practices over primary and secondary school. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Kutnick, P. (2008). Pupil grouping for learning: Developing a social pedagogy of the classroom. In R. Gillies, A. Ashman & J. Terwel (Eds.), The teacher’s role in implementing co-operative learning in classrooms (pp. 55–72). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N., & Dunne, E. (1992). Managing classroom groups. Hemel Hempstead: Simon & Schuster Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N., Desforges, C., Cockburn, A., & Wilkinson, B. (1984). The quality of pupil learning experiences. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., & Baines, E. (1999). The nature and use of classroom groups in primary schools. Final report to ESRC, held at British Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatchford, P., Baines, E., Kutnick, P., & Martin, C. (2001). Classroom contexts: Connections between class size and within class grouping. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E., & Galton, M. (2003). Towards a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatchford, P., Russell, A., & Webster, R. (2012). Reassessing the impact of teaching assistants: How research challenges practice and policy. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2000). Exploring situated insights into research and learning. Journal for Research in Mathematical Education, 31(1), 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, S., Barnett, B., & Filby, N. (1985). Grouping and instructional organization. In P. Peterson, L. Wilkinson & M. Hallinan (Eds.), The social context of instruction. Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G., & Intilli, J. K. (1981). Interdependence and management in bilingual classrooms. Final Report No. NIE-G-80-0217. Stanford: Stanford University, School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., & Lotan, R. (1995). Producing equal status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, H. (1994). Co-operative group work: a perspective from the U.K. International Journal of Educational Research (special issue on co-operative learning in social contexts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, H., & Rudduck, J. (1988). Learning together—Working together. In vol. 1: Cooperative group work—An overview and vol. 2: School and classroom studies. London: BP Educational Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, H., & Rudduck, J. (1990). Learning together—Working together. In vol. 1: co-operative group work in the multi-ethnic classroom. London: BP Educational Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Science (DfES). (2006). Education improvement partnerships. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreeben, R. (1984). First-grade reading groups: Their formation and change. In P. Peterson, L. Wilkinson & M. Hallinan (Eds.), The social context of instruction. Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (1994). The curricular applications of classroom groups. In P. Kutnick & C. Rogers (Eds.), Groups in schools. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, J., Galton, M., & Jones, M. (1976). Processes and products of science teaching. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, E. A., & Cazden, C. B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives on education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 323–347). New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M. (1990). Grouping and groupwork. In C. Rogers & P. Kutnick (Eds.), The social psychology of the primary school. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M., & Williamson, J. (1992). Groupwork in the primary school. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M. J., Simon, B., & Croll, P. (1980). Inside the primary classroom. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M. J., Hargreaves, L., Comber, C., Wall, D., & Pell, A. (1999). Inside the primary classroom: 20 years on. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R. (2004). The effects of communication training on teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 257–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R., & Kahn, A. (2009). Promoting reasoned argumentation, problem-solving and learning during small-group work. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. F., & Managan, J. M. (1995). Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers. British Educational Research Journal, 25(5), 613–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, S., & Toutounji, I. (1996). What do we know about the grouping of pupils by ability? London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, S., Ireson, J., & Davies, J. (2004). Primary pupils’ experiences of different types of grouping in school. British Journal of Educational Research, 30, 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, N., & Chantry, K. (2002). Reorganising primary classroom learning. Buckingham: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C. (2010). Peer groups and children's development: Psychological and educational perspectives. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C., & Tolmie, A. (2003). Group work in primary school science: Discussion, consensus and guidance from experts. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Duchak-Tanner, V., & Rattray, C. (2000). Hypothesis testing in science: Group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 361–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (2001). Ability grouping in education. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireson, J., Clark, H., & Hallam, S. (2002). Constructing ability groups in the secondary school: Issues in practice. School Leadership and Management, 22, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. (2003a). Joining together: Group theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2003b). Student motivation in co-operative groups: Social interdependence theory. In R. Gillies & A. Ashman (Eds.), Co-operative learning: Social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups. London: Routledge/Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2000). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102, 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87–116). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., & Berdondini, L. (2009). Can the enhancement of group working in classrooms provide a basis for effective communication in support of school-based cognitive achievement in classrooms of young learners? Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., & Jackson, A. (1996). Group work and computers: The effects of type of task on children’s performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 12, 162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., & Rogers, C. (1994) Groups in schools (pp. 216).London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., & Kington, A. (2005). Children’s friendships and learning in school; cognitive enhancement through social interaction? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P., & Baines, E. (2002). Pupil groupings in primary school classrooms: Sites for learning and social pedagogy? British Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P., & Baines, E. (2005). Grouping of pupils in secondary school classrooms: Possible links between pedagogy and learning. Social Psychology of Education, 8(4), 349–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., Colwell, J., & Canavan, J. (2006). Developing a relational approach to peer-based, pre-school experience; establishing bases for inclusion and educational achievement. Final report for the Esme Fairbairn Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P., Sebba, J., Blatchford, P., Galton, M., Thorp, J., Ota, C., Berdonini, L., & MacIntyre, H. (2005). An extended review of pupil grouping in schools. Research Report 688. Nottingham: DfES Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., & Cowie, H. (1993). Cooperative group work: Promises and limitations a study of teachers’ values. Education Section Review, 17(2), 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. R., Meill, D., & Mitchell, L. (2002). An investigation of children’s musical collaborations: The effect of friendship and age. Psychology of Music, 30, 148–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and development in children’s thinking—a socio-cultural approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrett, F. (1994). Whole class and individualized approaches. In P. Kutnick & C. Rogers (Eds.), Groups in schools. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirza, N. M., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2009). Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L. D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Wells: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1978). Notes towards a theory of complex learning. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pelligrino, S. D. Fokkema & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and education. Norwell: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. M., & King, A. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (1998). Setting in primary schools. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepitone, E. (1980). Children in co-operation and competition. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. E., Wilkinson, E. C., & Hallinan, M. (Eds.). (1985). The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, G., & Dudley, P. (1993). Assessing children learning collaboratively. Chelmsford: Essex Development Advisory Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. (2000). Learning organizations for sustainable education reform. Key note address to First ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme, University of Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L.-J., Clark, A.-M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseth, C. J., Fang, F., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2006). Effects of cooperative learning on middle school students: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction: What can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10, 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. (2003). Collective reading of multiple texts in argumentative activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebba, J., Byers, R., & Rose, R. (1995). Redefining the whole curriculum for pupils with learning difficulties. London: Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication; rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture & Activity, 8, 42–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning (2nd Edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. Handbook of Psychology, 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In P. P. Lojoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–258). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing young minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tizard, B., Blatchford, P., Burke, J., Farquhar, C., & Plewis, I. (1988). Young children at school in the inner city. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. (1994). Peer tutoring. In P. Kutnick & C. Rogers (Eds.), Groups in schools. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behaviour in peer directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N., Franke, M. L., Tondra, D., Chan, A., Freund, D., Shein, P., & Melkonian, D. (2009). Explain to your partner: Teacher instructional practices and students’ dialogue in small groups. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrow, A. C. (in press). Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas; interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices and learning. International Journal of Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn: The social contexts of cognitive development(2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., & Wood, H. (1996). Vygotsky, tutoring and learning. Oxford Review of Education, 22(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younger, M. Warrington, M., & Williams, J., (1999). The gender gap and classroom interactions; reality and rhetoric. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, R., & Hartup, W. W. (1997). Friends as coworkers: Research review and classroom implications. Elementary School Journal, 98, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Kutnick .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P. (2014). Groups and Classrooms. In: Effective Group Work in Primary School Classrooms. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6991-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics