Skip to main content

Understanding Users’ Informational Constructs via a Triadic Method Approach: A Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ((AUST,volume 34))

Abstract

This chapter presents a case study of how “informational constructs”, based on Kelly (A theory of personality, Norton, New York, 1955/1963), contribute to the knowledge building process of users making sense of what they see on a screen. Through a combined formal and empirical research approach, our study sought to understand the informational constructs of 20 viewers who had experienced a snippet from a film. The methodological framework of this study developed two novel features. First, there was a symbolic formalization of the similarity-dissimilarity logic of informational constructs. Second, this formalization was combined with a qualitative methodology in order to operationalize, in part, the “General Definition of Information” framework of Floridi (The philosophy of information, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011b). The research method used in the study featured a custom-made interview template that allowed users to document their informational constructs. This was done by progressively filling in a triadic grid to crystallize both the scenic and the interpretative aspects of the snippet as a sense-making experience. Based on an axiomatico-inductive approach, the research findings show that the viewers’ informational constructs focused on the background passers-by of the film as a form of epistemological “touchstone” (hypothesis #1). An extensive analysis of one of the interviews conducted reveals how the background features of the film represented an interrelating “sounding board” in the viewer’s knowledge building process (hypothesis #2). The final discussion highlights the importance of the novel concept of interconnecting “resonances” in the emergence of informational constructs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This schematic overview could also apply to other artificial and synthetic systems such as computers and organizational systems.

  2. 2.

    According to Floridi (2010: 23), Donald Mackay (1969) argued that “information is a distinction that makes a difference” well before Gregory Bateson’s more well known (1972/2000: 315) idea that a “bit” of information as “a difference which makes a difference”.

  3. 3.

    Diaphora is the Greek word for “difference” (Floridi 2011b: 85): following Floridi’s lead, we shall use it and the adjectival form “diaphoric” in our discussion here.

  4. 4.

    Hence the title of his often cited work, Steps to Ecology of Mind (1972), and a less well-known work, A Sacred Unity: Further Steps to an Ecology of Mind (1991).

  5. 5.

    By case-based reasoning is meant a problem-solving process that uses solutions of “similar” past experiences to resolve new problems.

  6. 6.

    “The relation of thought to word is not a thing but a process, a continual movement backward and forth from thought to word and from word to thought. In that process, the relation of thought to word undergoes changes that themselves may be regarded as developmental in the functional sense. Thought is not merely expressed in words; it comes into existence through them. Every thought tends to connect something with something else, to establish a relation between things. Every thought moves, grows and develops, fulfills a function, solves a problem”, Vygotsky (1934/1986: 218).

  7. 7.

    The process of dialogue is seen as an “art of thinking” that raises questions and possibilities with reference to a subject matter – and resists being “suppressed by the dominant opinion” – to enable sense-makers to “metamorphose” their viewpoints (Gadamer 1960/2004: 361, 381). This point echoes Floridi’s “network of relation” of queries and answers.

  8. 8.

    Ascriptions occur when an interviewee assigns attributes to a phenomenon based essentially on lived experiences, cf. Haferkamp and Smelser (1992: 109–111).

  9. 9.

    A diaphoric 1 process establishes how two of the data (within a triadic cluster) are apparently similar to each other but different to the third datum in a given communicational space, in this case, when viewing a cinematographic car chase in a semi-directive interview condition.

  10. 10.

    An inappropriate similarity ascription would have been, for example, if the person had said that a similarity between the Pursuer and the Pursued is that they are “human beings”. This would not have been useful as the term “human being” could also apply to the Passers-by. The researcher asked the user whether the term “human being” applied or not to “Passers-by” in order to check if the ascribed meaning of “human being” applies or not to “Passers-by”. If so, the term was considered inappropriate.

  11. 11.

    A diaphoric 2 process establishes how a chosen attribute is meaningfully contrary to a given diaphoric 1 attribute.

  12. 12.

    For Floridi and Sanders (2004: 17) a “Level of Explanation” is an important kind of “Level of Abstraction” (specification of elements that can be meaningfully broached and the kind of data that can be expected from a given operation). A Level of Explanation describes, for example, “the expert’s or the layperson’s point of view” without claiming to reflect an ultimate description of the system (p. 27).

  13. 13.

    Based on a Visual Analogue Scale psychometric sliding response scale, Questionnaire #2 consisted of four questions to establish if the viewers wanted to see the film, found the film animated, were drawn to the screen, and felt emotions. The questions were developed from the results of a preceding pilot study.

  14. 14.

    Using a Visual Analogue Scale, Questionnaire #3 asked if the viewer wanted to see the film in its entirety.

  15. 15.

    Cognitive dissonance arises when a person is confronted with stressful and unresolved conflicting events arising either from past experiences and/or internal inconsistencies in his or her decisional process, or when there is a preoccupying conflict between what the person does in public and what he or she privately believes (Festinger 1957: 14).

  16. 16.

    In its technical acoustic sense, a sounding board is a structure that amplifies the sound of a speaker or a player of a string instrument. The quality of a sounding board depends on its resonating properties.

References

  • Ansoff, I.H., and E. McDonnell. 1990. Implanting strategic management. New York: Prentice/Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, J.S. 2011. Learning and teaching: Personal construct theory. http://learningandteaching.info/learning/personal.htm. Accessed 22 May 2012.

  • Bates, M. 2005. Information and knowledge: An evolutionary framework for information science. Information Research 10(4). http://informationr.net/ir/10-4/paper239.html. Accessed 22 May 2012.

  • Bateson, G. 1972/2000. Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. 1979/1984. La Nature et la pensée. Paris: Editions Seuil. [Originally published as 1979. Mind and nature. New York: E. P. Dutton.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. 1991/1996. Une unite sacré: Quelques pas de plus vers une écologie de l’esprit. Paris: Editions du Seuil. [Originally published as 1996. A sacred unity: Further steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Harper & Row.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. 1997. The sense of reality. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou, D., T. Marchant, M. Pirlot, A. Tsoukias, and P. Vincke. 2006. Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria. Stepping stones for the analyst. Paris: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, H. 1927. An interpretation of the Weber-Fechner law. Psychological Review 34(4): 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crévits, I., and A. Tsoukiàs. 2012. Opérationnalisation du processus d’aide à la décision. In Conférence Internationale Francophone sur l’Extraction et la Gestion des Connaissances. Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, T., and M.G.M. Ferguson-Hessler. 1996. Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist 31(2): 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., and T. Chaminade. 2003. Neural correlates of feeling sympathy. Neuropsychologia 41: 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B. 1999a. On studying information seeking methodology: The implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing and Management 35(6): 727–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B. 1999b. Sense-making’s theory of dialogue: A brief introduction. Paper presented at a non-divisional workshop held at the meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco. http://communication.sbs.ohio-state.edu/sense-making/meet/1999/meet99dervinintro.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2009.

  • Dervin, B. 2003. Human studies and user studies: A call for methodological interdisciplinarity. Information Research 9(1). http://informationr.net/ir/9-1/paper166.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2012.

  • Dervin, B. 2006. Researchers and practitioners talk about users and each other. Making user and audience studies matter – Paper 1. Information Research 12(1). http://informationr.net/ir/12-1/paper286.html. Accessed 5 Aug 2012.

  • Edwards, D. 2005. Unconscious influences on discourses about consciousness: Ideology, state-specific science and unformulated experience. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 5(1): 1–20. http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ipjp/article/viewFile/65610/53296. Accessed 26 Aug 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. 1991. The symbol theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row Peterson & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. 2003. From data to semantic information. Entropy 5: 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. 2010. Information: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. 2011a. Semantic conceptions of information. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/information-semantic/. Accessed 3 Aug 2012.

  • Floridi, L. 2011b. The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L., and J.W. Sanders. 2004. Levellism and the method of abstraction. Information Ethics Group research report. Research report 22.11.04. Oxford University and University of Bari. http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/activities/ieg/research_reports/ieg_rr221104.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2012.

  • Gadamer, H.-G. 1960/2004. Truth and method. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., and J. Colhoun. 2010. Analogical processes in human thought and learning. In Towards a theory of thinking: Building blocks for a conceptual framework. ed. B. Glatzeder, V. Goel, & A. von Müller. 35–48. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1976. New rules for sociological method. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., and C. Pierson. 1998. Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making sense of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haferkamp, H., and N.J. Smelser. 1992. Social change and modernity. Berkeley: The Regents of the University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanneret, Y. 2008. Penser la trivialité. Paris: Editons Hermès-Lavoisier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.A. 1955/1963. A theory of personality. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labour, M. 2010. Apport de la méthode triadique à l’analyse des pratiques informationnelles. Etudes de communication 35: 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labour, M. 2011. MEDIA-REPERES. Une méthode pour l’explicitation des construits de sens au visionnage. Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, University of Valenciennes, Valenciennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahire, B. 2006. La culture des individus. Paris: Edition La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leleu-Merviel, S. 1996. La scénistique. Méthodologie pour la conception de documents en média multiples suivant une approche qualité. Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, University of Paris 8, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leleu-Merviel, S., and M. Labour. 2012. A mediascopic approach to identifying non-verbal information sharing behaviour. Unpublished Research Report (22 January 2012). Lille/Valenciennes: University Lille Nord de France/UVHC, DeVisu Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D.M. (1969). Information, mechanism and meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manchel, F. 1990. Film study: An analytical bibliography, vol. 1. London: Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheibler, Ingrid. 2000. Gadamer: Between Heidegger and Habermas. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair, R.N., and J.A. Busch. 2000. Transmission of values: The information age crisis in socialization. Intercultural Communication Studies X(1): 67–96. http://structural-communication.com/Articles/Transmission-values.%20StClair-Busch.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2012.

  • Tsoukiàs, A. 2008. From decision theory to decision aiding methodology. European Journal of Operational Research 187: 138–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanoye, F., and A. Goliot-Lété. 1992. Précis d’analyse filmique. Paris: Nathan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1934/1986. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Labour .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Labour, M. (2014). Understanding Users’ Informational Constructs via a Triadic Method Approach: A Case Study. In: Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., Dousa, T. (eds) Theories of Information, Communication and Knowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 34. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6973-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics