Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind ((SHPM,volume 12))

  • 2373 Accesses

Abstract

The discussion on mental illness in Renaissance medical treatises followed ancient and medieval guidelines. Galen’s works were edited and studied together with the major Arab and Latin commentaries. Much attention was paid to the typical symptoms of melancholy: the impairment of the rational faculty and the experience of groundless fear and sorrow. The cause of melancholy was the excess of black bile which affected the brain and the spirits. There was an increasing interest in the various forms of melancholy, and non-medical writers also treated melancholy as a source of mental suffering. In some treatises melancholy was regarded as an epidemic nuisance. The melancholic-type person was dealt with in physiognomic typologies of temperaments which were associated with four bodily humours (phlegm, bile, blood and black bile). Many authors drew on the remark in Pseudo-Aristotle’s Problems 30 according to which a moderate amount of black bile might make people exceptionally talented. This speculation was supported by Marsilio Ficino’s treatise on the melancholic condition, which he said was marked by symptoms from depression and hallucinations to exceptional creativity. While most medical authors avoided religious speculations, the rise of occultism and witchcraft persecution in later sixteenth century supported demonological explanations of melancholy. Academic authors often applied the medieval medical idea according to which it was probable that, medically speaking, the experiences of ‘demonic possessions’ were caused by melancholy, but they usually did not exclude the possibility that the devil might cause madness by disordering the humours and vital spirits. In the seventeenth century, scepticism about this emerged among learned people (1). For madness in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century literature, see Midelfort 1999, Gowland 2006a.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bright, T. (1586). Treatise of melancholy. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, Robert (Democritus Junior). (1638). The anatomy of melancholy, what it is. Oxford; first published 1621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Laurens, André. (1594). Discours de la conservation de la vue: des maladies mélancoliques, des catarrhes, et de la vieillesse. Tours. English translation (London, 1599).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrios, G. E., & Markova, I. S. (2002). The concept of neuropsychiatry: A historical overview. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53, 629–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowland, A. (2006a). The worlds of Renaissance melancholy: Robert Burton in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gowland, A. (2006b). The problem of early modern melancholy. Past & Present, 191, 77–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klibansky, R., Panofsky, E., & Saxl, F. (1964). Saturn and melancholy: Studies in the history of natural philosophy, religion, and art. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midelfort, H. C. E. (1999). A history of madness in 16th-century Germany. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraisi, N. G. (2012). Psychology in some sixteenth- and seventeenth-century works on medicine. In P. J. J. M. Bakker, S. W. de Boer, & C. Leijenhorst (Eds.), Psychology and the other disciplines: A case of cross-disciplinary interaction (1250–1750) (Medieval and early modern science 19, pp. 325–343). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wack, M. F. (1990). Lovesickness in the middle ages: The Viaticum and its commentaries. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo Kaitaro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaitaro, T. (2014). Early Modern Theories. In: Knuuttila, S., Sihvola, J. (eds) Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6967-0_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics