Abstract
The discussion on mental illness in Renaissance medical treatises followed ancient and medieval guidelines. Galen’s works were edited and studied together with the major Arab and Latin commentaries. Much attention was paid to the typical symptoms of melancholy: the impairment of the rational faculty and the experience of groundless fear and sorrow. The cause of melancholy was the excess of black bile which affected the brain and the spirits. There was an increasing interest in the various forms of melancholy, and non-medical writers also treated melancholy as a source of mental suffering. In some treatises melancholy was regarded as an epidemic nuisance. The melancholic-type person was dealt with in physiognomic typologies of temperaments which were associated with four bodily humours (phlegm, bile, blood and black bile). Many authors drew on the remark in Pseudo-Aristotle’s Problems 30 according to which a moderate amount of black bile might make people exceptionally talented. This speculation was supported by Marsilio Ficino’s treatise on the melancholic condition, which he said was marked by symptoms from depression and hallucinations to exceptional creativity. While most medical authors avoided religious speculations, the rise of occultism and witchcraft persecution in later sixteenth century supported demonological explanations of melancholy. Academic authors often applied the medieval medical idea according to which it was probable that, medically speaking, the experiences of ‘demonic possessions’ were caused by melancholy, but they usually did not exclude the possibility that the devil might cause madness by disordering the humours and vital spirits. In the seventeenth century, scepticism about this emerged among learned people (1). For madness in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century literature, see Midelfort 1999, Gowland 2006a.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bright, T. (1586). Treatise of melancholy. London.
Burton, Robert (Democritus Junior). (1638). The anatomy of melancholy, what it is. Oxford; first published 1621.
Du Laurens, André. (1594). Discours de la conservation de la vue: des maladies mélancoliques, des catarrhes, et de la vieillesse. Tours. English translation (London, 1599).
Berrios, G. E., & Markova, I. S. (2002). The concept of neuropsychiatry: A historical overview. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53, 629–638.
Gowland, A. (2006a). The worlds of Renaissance melancholy: Robert Burton in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gowland, A. (2006b). The problem of early modern melancholy. Past & Present, 191, 77–120.
Klibansky, R., Panofsky, E., & Saxl, F. (1964). Saturn and melancholy: Studies in the history of natural philosophy, religion, and art. New York: Basic Books.
Midelfort, H. C. E. (1999). A history of madness in 16th-century Germany. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Siraisi, N. G. (2012). Psychology in some sixteenth- and seventeenth-century works on medicine. In P. J. J. M. Bakker, S. W. de Boer, & C. Leijenhorst (Eds.), Psychology and the other disciplines: A case of cross-disciplinary interaction (1250–1750) (Medieval and early modern science 19, pp. 325–343). Leiden: Brill.
Wack, M. F. (1990). Lovesickness in the middle ages: The Viaticum and its commentaries. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaitaro, T. (2014). Early Modern Theories. In: Knuuttila, S., Sihvola, J. (eds) Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6967-0_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6967-0_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6966-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6967-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)