Abstract
The opening passage of Aristotle’s De interpretatione, usually read together with Boethius’s commentaries, was an important source for the medieval understanding of concepts: they are likenesses of things and mediate between spoken words and external things in signification. Augustine’s writings were another main source already available in the early Middle Ages. He maintained that the universals exist ante rem as ideas in the divine mind, advocated the theory of illumination, and developed the view of interior words of a specific kind. Third and most important, the Aristotelian De anima tradition of psychology, developed further by Arabic thinkers like Avicenna and Averroes, entered the Latin discussion gradually during the latter half of the twelfth century and the first half of the thirteenth century. These and other influences led to complex discussions about what kind of entities in the mind relating to concepts one should postulate and how they should be described. In the Aristotelian view, the intellectual cognition of an external object requires the presence of the object’s form in the intellect. The late thirteenth-century standard account of how the form of the object gets into the intellect further developed the description of the complex psychological mechanism that had emerged in the Arabic tradition. The active intellect illuminates the phantasms and abstracts the intelligible content in them by stripping them from their accidental features. The universal forms thus abstracted will be imprinted in the possible intellect as intelligible species. The standard view, developed especially by Thomas Aquinas, was to regard the intelligible species and the concept proper as two distinct entities. There was a great deal of dispute concerning issues related to concepts in the late thirteenth and early fourteenth century. The thought of William of Ockham opened a new phase in discussion. He rejected the idea that intellectual cognition requires the presence of the object’s form in the intellect. The concept or mental word, identified as an act of understanding, became the basic unit in the theory of mental language that Ockham put forward.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bazán, B. C. (2005). Radical aristotelianism in the faculties of arts. The case of Siger of Brabant. In L. Honnefelder et al. (Eds.), Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge der Aristoteles-Rezeption im lateinischen Mittelalter (pp. 585–629). Münster: Aschendorff.
D’Ancona, C. (2008). Degrees of abstraction in Avicenna. How to combine Aristotle’s De anima and the enneads, in Knuuttila & Kärkkäinen (Eds.), 47–71.
Davidson, H. A. (1992). Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, on intellect. Their cosmologies, theories of the active intellect, and theories of human intellect. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hasse, D. N. (2000). Avicenna’s De anima in the latin west. The formation of a peripatetic philosophy of the soul 1160–1300. London/Turin: The Warburg Institute/Aragno.
Ivry, A. L. (2008a). The ontological entailments of Averroes’ understanding of perception, in Knuuttila & Kärkkäinen (Eds.), 73–86.
Ivry, A. (2008b). Arabic and Islamic psychology and philosophy of mind. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu
King, P. (2004a). Duns Scotus on mental content. In O. Boulnois et al. (Eds.), Duns Scot à Paris, 1302–2002 (Textes et etudes du Moyen Âge 26, pp. 65–88). Turnhout: Brepols.
King, R. A. H. (2004b). Aristoteles: De Memoria et Reminiscentia, a German translation with an introduction and commentary, in Aristoteles: Werke, 14.2. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Panaccio, C. (2004). Ockham on concepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Pasnau, R. (1995). Henry of Ghent and the twilight of divine illumination. The Review of Metaphysics, 49, 49–75.
Pasnau, R. (2003). Cognition. In T. Williams (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Scotus (pp. 285–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pasnau, R. (2011). Divine illumination. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophyhttp://plato.stanford.edu
Perler, D. (2002). Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Spruit, L. (1994–1995). Species intelligibilis: From perception to knowledge, vol. I: Classical roots and medieval discussions; vol. II: Renaissance controversies, later scholasticism, and the elimination of the intelligible species in modern philosophy. Leiden: Brill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holopainen, T.J. (2014). Concepts and Concept Formation in Medieval Philosophy. In: Knuuttila, S., Sihvola, J. (eds) Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6967-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6967-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6966-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6967-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)