Skip to main content

Concepts and Concept Formation in Medieval Philosophy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind ((SHPM,volume 12))

  • 2410 Accesses

Abstract

The opening passage of Aristotle’s De interpretatione, usually read together with Boethius’s commentaries, was an important source for the medieval understanding of concepts: they are likenesses of things and mediate between spoken words and external things in signification. Augustine’s writings were another main source already available in the early Middle Ages. He maintained that the universals exist ante rem as ideas in the divine mind, advocated the theory of illumination, and developed the view of interior words of a specific kind. Third and most important, the Aristotelian De anima tradition of psychology, developed further by Arabic thinkers like Avicenna and Averroes, entered the Latin discussion gradually during the latter half of the twelfth century and the first half of the thirteenth century. These and other influences led to complex discussions about what kind of entities in the mind relating to concepts one should postulate and how they should be described. In the Aristotelian view, the intellectual cognition of an external object requires the presence of the object’s form in the intellect. The late thirteenth-century standard account of how the form of the object gets into the intellect further developed the description of the complex psychological mechanism that had emerged in the Arabic tradition. The active intellect illuminates the phantasms and abstracts the intelligible content in them by stripping them from their accidental features. The universal forms thus abstracted will be imprinted in the possible intellect as intelligible species. The standard view, developed especially by Thomas Aquinas, was to regard the intelligible species and the concept proper as two distinct entities. There was a great deal of dispute concerning issues related to concepts in the late thirteenth and early fourteenth century. The thought of William of Ockham opened a new phase in discussion. He rejected the idea that intellectual cognition requires the presence of the object’s form in the intellect. The concept or mental word, identified as an act of understanding, became the basic unit in the theory of mental language that Ockham put forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bazán, B. C. (2005). Radical aristotelianism in the faculties of arts. The case of Siger of Brabant. In L. Honnefelder et al. (Eds.), Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge der Aristoteles-Rezeption im lateinischen Mittelalter (pp. 585–629). Münster: Aschendorff.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ancona, C. (2008). Degrees of abstraction in Avicenna. How to combine Aristotle’s De anima and the enneads, in Knuuttila & Kärkkäinen (Eds.), 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, H. A. (1992). Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, on intellect. Their cosmologies, theories of the active intellect, and theories of human intellect. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, D. N. (2000). Avicenna’s De anima in the latin west. The formation of a peripatetic philosophy of the soul 1160–1300. London/Turin: The Warburg Institute/Aragno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivry, A. L. (2008a). The ontological entailments of Averroes’ understanding of perception, in Knuuttila & Kärkkäinen (Eds.), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivry, A. (2008b). Arabic and Islamic psychology and philosophy of mind. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu

  • King, P. (2004a). Duns Scotus on mental content. In O. Boulnois et al. (Eds.), Duns Scot à Paris, 1302–2002 (Textes et etudes du Moyen Âge 26, pp. 65–88). Turnhout: Brepols.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. A. H. (2004b). Aristoteles: De Memoria et Reminiscentia, a German translation with an introduction and commentary, in Aristoteles: Werke, 14.2. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panaccio, C. (2004). Ockham on concepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (1995). Henry of Ghent and the twilight of divine illumination. The Review of Metaphysics, 49, 49–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (2003). Cognition. In T. Williams (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Scotus (pp. 285–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (2011). Divine illumination. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophyhttp://plato.stanford.edu

  • Perler, D. (2002). Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruit, L. (1994–1995). Species intelligibilis: From perception to knowledge, vol. I: Classical roots and medieval discussions; vol. II: Renaissance controversies, later scholasticism, and the elimination of the intelligible species in modern philosophy. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toivo J. Holopainen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holopainen, T.J. (2014). Concepts and Concept Formation in Medieval Philosophy. In: Knuuttila, S., Sihvola, J. (eds) Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6967-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics