Advertisement

International Phenological Observation Networks: Concept of IPG and GPM

  • Frank-M. ChmielewskiEmail author
  • Stefan Heider
  • Susanne Moryson
  • Ekko Bruns
Chapter

Abstract

International phenological observation networks are of great importance for many applications in phenology. Data from these networks generally have a high quality standard (genetically identical plants, standardized observation guidelines, etc.) and cover different climatic regions. In this chapter we introduce two networks, the International Phenological Gardens in Europe (IPG) and the Global Phenological Monitoring Programme (GPM). Both observation networks are coordinated by the Humboldt-University of Berlin (Germany). These networks allow a phenological monitoring across lager geographical areas. At the end of each paragraph, we show some examples how these data can be used for scientific applications. They are of great importance to describe relationships between observed climate variability/change and plant development and they can be used to develop or validate phenological models which are able to project possible future shifts in plant development.

Keywords

Phenological Stage Grow Season Length Phenological Data Corylus Avellana Phenological Observation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Atkinson MD (2002) Phenological studies of Sambucus nigra. Arbor Phaenol 45:20–25Google Scholar
  2. Bruns E (1995) News for the phenological observers of the German Meteorological Service. Phenol J 3:2Google Scholar
  3. Bruns E, van Vliet AJH (2003) Standardization of phenological monitoring in Europe. Final Project Report, Wageningen University and Deutscher Wetterdienst, 79pGoogle Scholar
  4. Caffarra A, Donnelly A (2011) The ecological significance of phenology in four different tree species: effects of light and temperature on bud burs. Int J Biometeorol 55:711–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chmielewski FM, Rötzer T (2001) Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe. Agric For Meteorol 108:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chmielewski FM, Rötzer T (2002) Annual and spatial variability of the beginning of growing season in Europe in relation to air temperature changes. Clim Res 19(1):257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chuine I (2001) Using the IPG observations to test for model estimates stability across environments. Arbor Phaenol 44:6–8Google Scholar
  8. Donelly A (2002) Trees as climate change indicators for Ireland. Arbor Phaenol 45:7–19Google Scholar
  9. EEA (2004) Impacts of Europe’s changing climate: an indicator-based assessment. European Environment Agency Copenhagen Report 2. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  10. Haylock MR, Hofstra N, Klein Tank AMG, Klok EJ, Jones PD, New M (2008) A European daily high-resolution gridded dataset of surface temperature and precipitation. J Geophys Res Atmos 113:D20119. doi: 10.1029/2008JD10201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koch E, Adler S, Lipa W, Ungersböck M, Zach-Hermann S (2010) The pan European phenological database PEP725. In: Berichte des Meteorologischen Institutes der Albrecht-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Nr. 20. Proceedings of the 7th conference on Biometeorology. http://www.mif.uni-freiburg.de/biomet/bm7/report20.pdf
  12. Köstner B, Niemand C, Prasse H (2005) A 40-year study period of tree phenology at Tharandt international phenological garden. Arbor Phaenol 48:197–202Google Scholar
  13. Kramer K (1996) Phenology and growth of European trees in relation to climate change. Master’s thesis, Landbouw Universiteit, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  14. Lauscher F (1985) Zur Phänologie vegetative vermehrter Pflanzen einheitlicher Herkunft – Beobachtungen in phänologischen Pflanzgärten in Norwegen 1963–1982. Phyton 25:253–272Google Scholar
  15. Lebourgeois F, Pierrat JC, Perez V, Piedallu C, Ceccini S, Ulrich E (2010) Simulating phenological shifts in French temperate forests under two climate change scenarios and for driving global circulation models. Int J Biometeorol 54:563–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Matzneller P, Blümel K, Chmielewski FM (2013) Models for the beginning of sour cherry blossom. Int J Biometeorol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0651-1
  17. Meier U (1997) Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants. BBCH-Monograph Blackwell, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. Menzel A (1997) Phänologie von Waldbäumen unter sich ändernden Klimabedingungen – Auswertung der Beobachtungen der Internationalen Phänologischen Gärten in Deutschland und Möglichkeiten der Modellierung von Phänodaten. Forstliche Forschungsberichte München 164:147Google Scholar
  19. Menzel A (2000) Trends in phenological phases in Europe between 1951 and 1996. Int J Biometeorol 44:76–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Menzel A, Fabian P (1999) Growing season extended in Europe. Nature 397:659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kübler K, Bissolli P, Braslavská O, Briede A, Chmielewsk FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl Å, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatczak K, Måge F, Mestre A, Nordli Ø, Peñuelas J, Pirinen P, Remišová V, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski FE, Zach S, Zust A (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Chang Biol 12:1969–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rödiger MS (2012) Temperature changes in Europe 1969–2010 and impacts on the beginning and end of growing season. Master’s thesis, Humboldt University BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenzweig C, Casassa G, Karoly DJ, Imeson A, Liu C, Menzel A, Rawlins S, Seguin B, Tryjanowski P (2007) Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Rötzer T, Chmielewski FM (2001) Phenological maps of Europe. Clim Res 18(3):249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rötzer T, Grote R, Pretzsch H (2004) The timing of bud burst and its effect on tree growth. Int J Biometeorol 48:109–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sandig S (1992) Der Internationale Phänologische Garten Grafrath – langjährige Beobachtungen und Ergebnisse. Diplomarbeit Universität MünchenGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmittnägel HR (1983) Vergleich phänologischer Phasen verschiedener Baumarten und -herkünfte in Europa anhand der Beobachtungsdaten der Internationalen Phänologischen Gärten. Diplomarbeit Universität GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  29. Schnelle F (1977) Beiträge zur Phänologie Europas III. Ergebnisse aus den Internationalen Phänologischen Gärten (Regionale und Jahresunterschiede 1966–1975). Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes 144:1–31Google Scholar
  30. Schnelle F (1986) Ergebnisse aus den Internationalen Phänologischen Gärten in Europa – Mittel 1973–1982. Wetter und Leben 38:5–17Google Scholar
  31. Schnelle F, Volkert E (1957) Vorschläge zur Einrichtung „Internationaler Phänologischer Gärten“ als Stationen eines Grundnetzes für internationale phänologische Beobachtungen. Meteorologische Rundschau 10:130–133Google Scholar
  32. Seidler C (1995) Langjährige phänologische Beobachtungen in Hartha (Tharandter Wald). Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der TU Dresden 44:69–72Google Scholar
  33. van Vliet AJH, de Groot RS, Bellens Y, Braun P, Bruegger R, Bruns E, Clevers J, Estreguil C, Flechsig M, Jeanneret F, Maggi M, Marten P, Menne B, Menzel A, Sparks T (2003) The European phenology network. Int J Biometeorol 47:202–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank-M. Chmielewski
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefan Heider
    • 1
  • Susanne Moryson
    • 1
  • Ekko Bruns
    • 2
  1. 1.Agricultural Climatology, Department of Crop and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and HorticultureHumboldt-University of BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of Networks and DataGerman Meteorological ServiceOffenbachGermany

Personalised recommendations