Abstract
In the last twenty years or so, the development of hard thin coatings has progressed to the state that hardness testing based on an instrumented technique has become very popular since for this application, the depth of penetration has to be kept within a small percentage of the overall coating thickness and the resulting impressions are too small for an accurate traditional optical measurement. Despite the well-known methods of analyzing instrumented indentation data, considerable problems arise when this test is applied to very hard materials. The underlying boundary conditions for instrumented indentation analysis are often ignored by practitioners who are sometimes accepting of the results at face value, since often they provide a very pleasing and desirable estimation of hardness of their samples. This chapter reviews the essential features of instrumented indentation analysis and points out the significance of those issues that can affect the computed values of both hardness and elastic modulus. In particular, the significance of the geometry factor ε, the indenter area function, and the mean pressure elastic limit. These interrelated factors can conspire to increase the computed value of hardness by up to a factor of 2 if not properly taken into account. This chapter educates and informs the reader so that results of hardness for very hard materials may be properly interpreted when either viewed in the literature or obtained experimentally so as to avoid incorrect conclusions and results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Caw W (1969) The elastic behaviour of a sharp obtuse wedge impressed on a plane. J Phys E: Sci Instrum 2(2):73–78
Fischer-Cripps AC, Bull SJ, Schwarzer N (2012) Critical review of claims for ultra hardness in nanocomposite coatings. Phil Mag 92(13):1601–1630
Fischer-Cripps A, Bendeli A, Bell T, Field J, Jamting A (2001) Methods of correction for analysis of depth-sensing indentaton test data for spherical indenters. J Mater Res 16(8):2244–2250
Hertz H (1881) On the contact of elastic solids. J Reine Angew Math, 92. Translated and reprinted in English in Hertz’s Miscellaneous Papers, 1896 Ch. 5. Macmillan & Co., London, pp 156–171
Hertz H (1882) On hardness. Berh. Ver. Beforderung Gewerbe Fleisses, 61. Translated and reprinted in English in Hert’s Miscllenaneous Papers, 1896 Ch. 6. Macmillan & Co., London, p 410
Oliver W, Pharr G (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mat Res 7(4):1564–1583
Smith RL, Sandland G (1922) An accurate method of determining the hardness of metals with particular reference to those of high degree of hardness. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1:623–641
Sneddon IN (1948) Boussinesq’s problem for a rigid cone. Proc Cambridge Philos Soc 44:492–507
Wahlberg A (1901) Brinell’s method of determining hardness. J Iron Steel Inst London 59:243–298
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fischer-Cripps, A.C. (2014). Measurement of Hardness of Very Hard Materials. In: Tiwari, A. (eds) Nanomechanical Analysis of High Performance Materials. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 203. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6919-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6919-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6918-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6919-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)