Skip to main content

Sustaining Fish-Human Communities? A More-Than-Human Question

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethnographic Worldviews

Abstract

In 2009 an international team of scientists working with Clean Seas Tuna managed to get captive Southern Bluefin tuna to spawn on land. This was heralded as an international break through and a first step in producing wholly sustainable Bluefin tuna, a highly lucrative product. In this talk I want to explore how human populations have interacted with tuna and how this shapes identities in particular ways in the Eyre Peninsula of South Australia. To adequately capture the complexity of the seafood market takes us into ‘research in the wild’, as Michel Callon characterises ‘the new forms of techno-science-society interactions, in which non-scientists work with scientists to produce and disseminate knowledge.’ (2003) Callon’s earlier work on the scallop industry in France pointed to a new way of understanding the dynamics of markets. However he, along with much of ANT, ignores the sensuality of the material connections they trace. In this talk I will engage with what I have previously called a rhizo-ethnography of bodies as a necessary addition to his conception of markets. We will begin to see how human and tuna appetites forge historical and sensual networks essential to the promotion of sustainable seafood markets, in ways that open out the question of sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The more-than-human is a term primarily used in geography for studies that attempt to move beyond the human perspective, and shares some tenets of post-humanism. It is, of course, a rather more difficult task to do methodologically than to write about theoretically. My own take on this has been considerably helped by J.K. Gibson-Graham (2011) but also see Panelli (2010), McLean (2009). A recent issue devoted to ‘multispecies ethnography’ is provocative (Kirksey & Helmreich, 2010). While research on fish tends to be somewhat under studied within the social sciences, there are notable exceptions from which I take inspiration. Ted Bestor’s (2000, 2003, 2004) work on tuna in the context of Tsukiji and more generally Japanese culture is a wonderful look at how Bluefin Tuna came to be so valued, as well as the globalization of a taste for sushi. Becky Mansfield (2005) and Kate Barclay and Sun-Hui Koh (2008) investigate questions of governance in the tuna industry respectively in North America and Japan. Kevin St. Martin (2004, 2005) has investigated the communities of North American fisheries. Christopher Bear and Sally Eden (2008) have brought a more-than-human perspective to both angling and regional network of fisheries regulation. My interest in fish farming has been considerably furthered in conversations with Marianne Lien and John Law about their joint project on Norwegian Atlantic salmon farming – Norway is, of course, the largest producer and technical force behind fish farming. See, Law (2010), and Lien (2005, 2007).

  2. 2.

    This research has been funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project grant: E. Probyn, ‘Taste & Place: the transglobal production and consumption of food and drink’ (DP0987083).

  3. 3.

    This is a very condensed account, which elsewhere I expand upon (Probyn, 2011). To briefly explain, Hagen Stehr set up Cleanseas, which has effectively closed the breeding cycle of kingfish – a native Australian fish – and is now attempting to do it commercially with tuna.

  4. 4.

    Christopher Connery asks whether for Barthes: ‘is it the void beyond and outside of the terrestrial real? A blank interstitial element?’ (1996, p. 290). Connery argues that ‘signify it does, although in a manner beyond resolve’ (p. 290).

  5. 5.

    The so-called ‘Pacific solution’ to asylum seekers arriving by boat was introduced under the previous government (see Magner, 2004). As Sara Ramey explains, ‘Sending asylum seekers to third countries became part of the Pacific Solution, a series of measures designed to address the immigration “crisis”’ (Ramey, 2011).

  6. 6.

    The oceans are a visceral reminder of ‘the tragedy of the commons’. In 1968 Garrett Hardin, a genetic biologist, debated the consequences of population growth in terms that are instructive and provocative: ‘It is fair to say that most people who anguish over the population problem are trying to find a way to avoid the evils of over-population without relinquishing any of the privileges they now enjoy. They think that farming the seas or developing new strains of wheat will solve the problem – technically.’ (1968: 1243)

  7. 7.

    For a more comprehensive account of oysters, their taste and biology and place within the literature of oyster-lovers, see Probyn (2012).

  8. 8.

    Maggie Beer, one of Australia’s most respected food experts, suggested the title of the symposium. The aim of this international symposium was to advance debate about the production and consumption of food beyond its safe confines as ‘feel good politics’ and it brought together a dozen producers as well as speakers such as Julie Guthman, Stewart Lockie and Mara Miele. http://www.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/events/producing-regions.asp

References

  • ABARE. (2009). Australian fisheries statistics 2008. Canberra, Australia: ABARE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abram, S., & Lien, M. (2011). Performing nature at world’s ends. Ethnos (Special Issue) 76(1), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (200102). Regional Population Growth, Australia and New Zealand 200102, cat. no. 3218.0. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf. Accessed 10 Sept 2011.

  • Bakker, K., & Bridge, G. (2006). Material worlds? Resource geographies and the ‘matter of nature’. Progress in Human Geography, 30(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, K., & Koh, S.-H. (2008). Neo-liberal reforms in Japan’s tuna fisheries? A History of Government-Business Relations in a Food-Producing, 20(2), 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1984). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). London: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear, C., & Eden, S. (2008). Making space for the fish: The regional, network and fluid spaces of fisheries certification. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(5), 487–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bear, C., & Eden, S. (2011). Thinking like a fish? Engaging with nonhuman difference through recreational fishing. Environment & Planning D: Society & Space, 29, 336–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bestor, T. C. (2000). When sushi went global. http://www.globalpolicy.org. Accessed 22 Apr 2010.

  • Bestor, T. C. (2003). Inquisitive observation: Following networks in urban ethnography. In T. Bestor, P. Steinhoff, & V. L. Bestor (Eds.), Doing fieldwork in Japan. Honolulu, Australia: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bestor, T. C. (2004). Tsukiji: The fish market at the center of the world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, B., & Shortall, S. (Eds.). (2006). Rural gender relations: Issues and case studies. London: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, S. (2011, May 9). Can rec fishing and marine parks co-exist? Fishing World. http://www.fishingworld.com.au/news/comment-can-rec-fishing-and-marine-parks-co-exist

  • Connery, C. L. (1996). The oceanic feeling and regional imaginary. In R. Wilson & W. Dissanayake (Eds.), Global/local: Cultural production and the transnational imaginary. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, A. (2011). Lines on a map don’t tell the whole story of marine reserves. http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/lines-on-a-map-dont-tell-the-whole-story-of-marine-reserves-20110530-1fc3p.html#ixzz1YBVk7zMm. Accessed 15 Sept 2011.

  • Fiske, J., Hodge, B., & Turner, G. (1987). Myths of Oz: Reading Australian popular culture. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. (2007). Dolly mixtures: The remaking of genealogy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2011). A feminist project of belonging for the Anthropocene. Gender, Place and Culture, 18(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. (1999). Agro-food studies in the ‘Age of Ecology’: Nature, corporeality, bio-politics. Sociologia Ruralis, 39(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2010). When species meet: Staying with trouble. Environment & Planning D: Society & Space, 28, 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, L. (2007). Cultural ecology: The problematic human and the terms of engagement. Progress in Human Geography, 31(6), 837–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, S. (2009). Alien ocean: Anthropological voyages in microbial seas. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, S. (2011). Nature/seawater/culture. American Anthropologist, 113(1), 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, S. (2010). Where species meet. Environment & Planning D: Society & Space, 28, 34–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. (2000). (Un)ethical geographies of human-non-human relations: Encounters, collectives and spaces. In P. Chris & W. Chris (Eds.), Animal spaces, beastly places: New geographies of animal-human relations (pp. 268–291). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 23(4), 545–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2010). ‘Fishy companions?’ Talk given at the Following Commodities conference. Hawke Research Institute. Adelaide, University of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lien, M. (2005). ‘King of fish’ or ‘feral peril’: Tasmanian Atlantic Salmon and the politics of belonging. Environment & Planning D: Society & Space, 23(5), 659–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, M. (2007). Feeding fish efficiently. Mobilising knowledge in Tasmanian salmon farming. Social Anthropology, 15(2), 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, M., & Law, J. (2010). Emergent aliens: Performing indigeneity and other ways of doing salmon in Norway (Working paper). CRESC, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences. Walton Hall, UK: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S. (2002). The invisible mouth: Mobilizing the consumer in food production—Consumption networks. Sociologia Ruralis, 42(4), 78–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magner, T. (2004). A less than ‘Pacific’ solution for asylum seekers in Australia. International Journal of Refugee Law, 16(1), 53–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, B. (2005). Beyond rescaling: Reintegrating the ‘national’ as a dimension of scalar relations. Progress in Human Geography, 29(4), 458–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, S. (2009). Stories and cosmogonies: Imagining creativity beyond ‘nature’ and ‘culture’. Cultural Anthropology, 24(2), 213–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miele, M. (2011). The taste of happiness: Free range chicken. Environment and Planning A (Theme issue: ‘The new borders of consumption) 43, 2076–2090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J. (1997). Inhuman/nonhuman/human: Actor-network theory and the prospects for a non dualistic and symmetrical perspective on society. Environment & Planning D, 15(6), 731–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Native Title Tribune. (2010). Torres Strait sea rights recognise. July 2, 2010. http://www.nntt.gov.au. Accessed 21 Jan 2011.

  • Nell, J. A., Cox. E, Smith I. R, & McGuire, G. B. (1994). Studies on triploid oysters in Australia. I. The farming potential of triploid Sydney rock oysters Saccostrea commercialis (Iredale and Roughley). Aquaculture, 126(3–4), 243–255. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004484869490040X. Accessed 2 Sept 2011.

  • Pálsson, G. (1994). Enskilment at sea. Man, 29, 901–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pálsson, G., & Helgason, A. (1996). Figuring fish and measuring men: The individual transferable quota system in the Icelandic cod fishery. Ocean and Coastal Management, 28(1–3), 117–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panelli, R. (2010). More-than-human social geographies: Posthuman and other possibilities. Progress in Human Geography, 34(1), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. B. (1998). The oceanic feeling revisited. The Journal of Religion, 78(4), 501–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probyn, E. (2011). Swimming with tuna: Human-ocean entanglements. Australian Humanities Review, 51, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probyn, E. (2012). In the interests of taste & place: Economies of attachment. In G. Pratt & V. Rosner (Eds.), The global intimate. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, S. (2011). Living up to human rights in Australia: Observations of granting asylum. Oxford Monitor on Forced Migration 1(1). Oxmofm.com. Accessed 30 Sept 2011.

  • Rigby, K. (2011). Getting a taste for the Bogong moth. Australian Humanities Review, 50, 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P., & Mason, J. (2006). The way we eat: Why our food choices matter. Emmaus, PA: Rodale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart Farmer. (2010). Indulge your senses at pristine Coffin Bay. http://smartfarmer.realviewtechnologies.com/default.aspx?iid=43438&startpage=page000

  • St. Martin, K. (2004). The impact of ‘community’ on fisheries management in the US Northeast. Geoforum, 27, 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Martin, K. (2005). Mapping economic diversity in the first world: The case of fisheries. Environment & Planning A, 37(6), 959–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Butler, B. (2006). State of the environment: Coasts and oceans. Canberra, Australia: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elspeth Probyn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Probyn, E. (2014). Sustaining Fish-Human Communities? A More-Than-Human Question. In: Rinehart, R., Barbour, K., Pope, C. (eds) Ethnographic Worldviews. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6916-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics