Ecosystem Services: Developing Sustainable Management Paradigms Based on Wetland Functions and Processes



In the late nineteenth century and twentieth century, there was considerable interest and activity to develop the United States for agricultural, mining, and many other purposes to improve the quality of human life standards and prosperity. Most of the work to support this development was focused along disciplinary lines with little attention focused on ecosystem service trade-offs or synergisms, especially those that transcended boundaries of scientific disciplines and specific interest groups. Concurrently, human population size has increased substantially and its use of ecosystem services has increased more than five-fold over just the past century. Consequently, the contemporary landscape has been highly modified for human use, leaving behind a fragmented landscape where basic ecosystem functions and processes have been broadly altered. Over this period, climate change also interacted with other anthropogenic effects, resulting in modern environmental problems having a complexity that is without historical precedent. The challenge before the scientific community is to develop new science paradigms that integrate relevant scientific disciplines to properly frame and evaluate modern environmental problems in a systems-type approach to better inform the decision-making process. Wetland science is a relatively new discipline that grew out of the conservation movement of the early twentieth century. In the United States, most of the conservation attention in the earlier days was on wildlife, but a growing human awareness of the importance of the environment led to the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act in 1969. Concurrently, there was a broadening interest in conservation science, and the scientific study of wetlands gradually gained acceptance as a scientific discipline. Pioneering wetland scientists became formally organized when they formed The Society of Wetland Scientists in 1980 and established a publication outlet to share wetland research findings. In comparison to older and more traditional scientific disciplines, the wetland sciences may be better equipped to tackle today’s complex problems. Since its emergence as a scientific discipline, the study of wetlands has frequently required interdisciplinary and integrated approaches. This interdisciplinary/integrated approach is largely the result of the fact that wetlands cannot be studied in isolation of upland areas that contribute surface and subsurface water, solutes, sediments, and nutrients into wetland basins. However, challenges still remain in thoroughly integrating the wetland sciences with scientific disciplines involved in upland studies, especially those involved with agriculture, development, and other land-conversion activities that influence wetland hydrology, chemistry, and sedimentation. One way to facilitate this integration is to develop an understanding of how human activities affect wetland ecosystem services, especially the trade-offs and synergisms that occur when land-use changes are made. Used in this context, an understanding of the real costs of managing for a particular ecosystem service or groups of services can be determined and quantified in terms of reduced delivery of other services and in overall sustainability of the wetland and the landscapes that support them. In this chapter, we discuss some of the more salient aspects of a few common wetland types to give the reader some background on the diversity of functions that wetlands perform and the specific ecosystem services they provide to society. Wetlands are among the most complex ecosystems on the planet, and it is often difficult to communicate to a diverse public all of the positive services wetlands provide to mankind. Our goal is to help the reader develop an understanding that management options can be approached as societal choices where decisions can be made within a spatial and temporal context to identify trade-offs, synergies, and effects on long-term sustainability of wetland ecosystems. This will be especially relevant as we move into alternate climate futures where our portfolio of management options for mitigating damage to ecosystem function or detrimental cascading effects must be diverse and effective.


Ecosystem Service Salt Marsh Wetland Type Vernal Pool High Plain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material


  1. Abernethy Y, Turner RE (1987) U. S. forested wetlands: 1940–1980. BioScience 37:721–727Google Scholar
  2. Albert DA, Wilcox DA, Ingram JW, Thompson TA (2005) Hydrogeomorphic classification for Great Lakes coastal wetlands. J Great Lakes Res 31(1):129–146Google Scholar
  3. Baedke SJ, Thompson TA (2000) A 4,700-year record of lake level and isostasy for Lake Michigan. J Great Lakes Res 26:416–426Google Scholar
  4. Barnes WJ (1997) Vegetation dynamics on the floodplain of the lower Chippewa River in Wisconsin. J Torrey Bot Soc 124:189–197Google Scholar
  5. Barras J, Beville S, Britsch D, Hartley S, Hawes S, Johnston J, Kemp P, Kinler Q, Martucci A, Porthouse J, Reed D, Roy K, Sapkota S, Suhayda J (2003) Historical and projected coastal Louisiana land changes: 1978-2050. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 03-334, 39 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Battaglia LL, Keough JR, Pritchett DW (1995) Early secondary succession on a southeastern U.S. alluvial floodplain. J Veg Sci 6:769–776Google Scholar
  7. Battaglia LL, Sharitz RR, Minchin PR (1999) Heterogeneity of hurricane disturbance and regeneration patterns in an old-growth bottomland hardwood community. Can J For Res 29:144–156Google Scholar
  8. Bell DT, Johnson FL (1974) Flood-caused mortality around Illinois reservoirs. Trans Ill State Acad Sci 67:28–37Google Scholar
  9. Bennett E, Carpenter S, Cork S, Peterson G, Petschel-Held G, Ribeiro T, Zurek M (2005) Chapter 5. Scenarios for ecosystem services: rationale and overview. Millennium ecosystem assessment, ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios. Findings of the scenarios working group. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertness MD, Ewanchuk PJ (2002) Latitudinal and climate-driven variation in the strength and nature of biological interactions in New England salt marshes. Oecologia 132:392–401Google Scholar
  11. Bertness MD, Crain C, Holdredge C, Sala N (2008) Eutrophication and consumer control of New England salt marsh primary productivity. Conserv Biol 22(1):131–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Boesch DF (2002) Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal ecosystems. Estuaries 25(4b):886–900Google Scholar
  13. Bolen EG, Smith LM, Schramm HL Jr (1989) Playa lakes: prairie wetlands of the Southern High Plains. BioScience 39:615–623Google Scholar
  14. Bornette G, Amoros C (1997) Disturbance regimes and vegetation dynamics: role of floods in riverine wetlands. J Veg Sci 7:615–622Google Scholar
  15. Brinson MM (1990) Riverine forests. In: Lugo AE, Brinson MM, Brown SL (eds) Forested wetlands, vol 15. Ecosystems of the world. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, pp 87–141Google Scholar
  16. Brinson MM (1993) A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Technical report WRP-DE-4, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Brinson MM, Hauer FR, Lee LC, Nutter WL, Rheinhardt RD, Smith RD, Whigham D (1995) A guidebook for application of hydrogeomorphic assessments to riverine wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Technical report WRP-DE-11, Vicksburg, MS, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Bultman TL (1992) Abundance and association of cursorial spiders from calcareous fens in southern Missouri. J Arachnol 20:165–172Google Scholar
  19. Burkett VR (2002) Intertidal zones. In: Mooney HA, Canadell JG (eds) The earth system: biological and ecological dimensions of global environmental change, encyclopedia of global environmental change, vol 2. Wiley, Chichester, pp 365–369Google Scholar
  20. Burkett VR, Wilcox DA, Stottlemeyer R, Barrow W, Fagre D, Baron J, Price J, Neilsen JL, Allen CD, Peterson DL, Ruggerone G, Doyle T (2005) Nonlinear dynamics in ecosystem response to climatic change: case studies and policy implications. Ecol Complex 2:357–394Google Scholar
  21. Burkett V, Fernandez L, Nicholls R, Woodroffe C (2009) Climate change impacts on coastal biodiversity. In: Fenech A, MacIver D, Dallmeier F (eds) Climate change and biodiversity in the Americas. Environment Canada, Ottawa, pp 167–193Google Scholar
  22. Canadell JG, Ciais P, Cox P, Heimann M (2004) Quantifying, understanding and managing the carbon cycle in the next decades. Clim Change 67:147–160Google Scholar
  23. Carter V (1996) Wetland hydrology, water quality and associated functions. National Water Summary on Wetland Resources, (Fretwell JD, Williams JS, Redman PJ, compilers), U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, pp 35–48Google Scholar
  24. Christensen NL, Bartuska AM, Brown JH, Carpenter S, D’Antonio C, Francis R, Franklin JF, MacMahon JA, Noss RF, Parsons DJ, Peterson CH, Turner MG, Woodmansee RG (1996) The report of the ecological society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 6:665–691Google Scholar
  25. Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority (2011) Fiscal year 2012 annual plan: integrated ecosystem restoration and hurricane protection in coastal Louisiana. Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, 172 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (CWPRA) Task Force (2000) Brown marsh phenomenon: questions and answers. CWPPRA Task Force Fact Sheet #5, 2 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Cole CA, Brooks RP, Wardrop DH (1997) Wetland hydrology as a function of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) subclass. Wetlands 17:456–467Google Scholar
  28. Conner WH (1995) Woody plant regeneration in three South Carolina Taxodium/Nyssa stands following Hurricane Hugo. Ecol Eng 4:277–287Google Scholar
  29. Conner WH, Sharitz RR (2005) Forest communities in bottomlands. In: Fredrickson LH, King SL, Kaminski RM (eds) Ecology and management of bottomland hardwood systems: the state of our understanding. Gaylord Memorial Laboratory Special Publication No. 10, Puxico, University of Missouri-Columbia, pp 93–120Google Scholar
  30. Constanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg B, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van Den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260Google Scholar
  31. Costanza R, Farber SC (1987) The economic value of wetlands systems. J Environ Manage 24:41–51Google Scholar
  32. Costanza R, Farber SC, Maxwell J (1989) Valuation and management of wetland ecosystems. Ecol Econ 1(4):335–361Google Scholar
  33. Cowdrey AE (1983) This land, this south: an environmental history. The University Press of Kentucky, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. Dahl TE, Johnson CE, Frayer WE (1991) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous united states, mid-1970’s to mid-1980’s. Report to congress. U. S. Department of Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Daily GC (ed) (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. Darby FA, Turner RE (2008) Effects of eutrophication on salt marsh root and rhizome biomass accumulation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 363:63–70Google Scholar
  37. Dickson JG, Thompson FR, Conner RN, Franzreb KE (1995) Silviculture in central and southeastern oak-pine forests. In: Martin TE, Finch DM (eds) Ecology and management of neotropical migratory birds: a synthesis and review of critical issues. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Environment Canada. (2002) Where land meets water: understanding wetlands of the Great Lakes. Wilcox DA, Patterson N, Albert D, Gannon J, Thompson T, Weeber R, McCracken J, Whillans, T (contributors); Environment Canada, Toronto, 72 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Euliss NH Jr, Laubhan MK (2005) Quantifying the environmental benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program on prairie wetlands: separating acts of nature from acts of Congress. In: Allen AW, Vandever MW (eds) The Conservation Reserve Program-planting for the future: proceedings of a national conference. Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, 6-9 June 2004. Special investigations report 2005-5145. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USAGoogle Scholar
  40. Euliss NH Jr, Mushet DM (1996) Water-level fluctuation in wetlands as a function of landscape condition in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16:587–593Google Scholar
  41. Euliss NH Jr, Mushet DM (2004) Impacts of water development on aquatic macroinvertebrates, amphibians, and plants in wetlands of a semi-arid landscape. Aquat Ecosyst Heal Manage 7:73–84Google Scholar
  42. Euliss NH Jr, LaBaugh JW, Fredrickson LH, Mushet DM, Laubhan MK, Swanson GA, Winter TC, Rosenberry DO, Nelson RD (2004) The wetland continuum: a conceptual framework for integrating biological studies. Wetlands 24:448–458Google Scholar
  43. Euliss NH Jr, Smith LM, Wilcox DA, Browne BA (2008) Linking ecosystem processes with wetland management goals: charting a course for a sustainable future. Wetlands 28:553–562Google Scholar
  44. Euliss NH Jr, Smith LM, Liu S, Feng M, Mushet DM, Auch RF, Loveland TR (2010) The need for simultaneous evaluation of ecosystem services and land use change. Environ Sci Technol 44:7761–7763PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Euliss NH Jr, Smith LM, Liu S, Duffy WG, Faulkner SP, Gleason RG, Eckles SD (2011) Integrating estimates of ecosystem services from conservation programs into models for decision makers. Ecol Appl 21:S128-S134.Google Scholar
  46. Fredrickson LH (2005) Contemporary bottomland hardwood systems: structure, function and hydrologic condition resulting from two centuries of anthropogenic activities. In: Fredrickson LH, King SL, Kaminski RM (eds) Ecology and management of bottomland hardwood systems: the state of our understanding. Gaylord Memorial Laboratory Special Publication No. 10, Puxico, University of Missouri-Columbia, pp 19–35Google Scholar
  47. Gedan KB, Silliman BR, Bertness MD (2009) Centuries of human-driven change in salt marsh ecosystems. Annu Rev Mar Sci 1:117–141Google Scholar
  48. Gentner B, Steinback S (2008) The economic contribution of marine angler expenditures in the United States, 2006. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFSF/SPO-94, 301 ppGoogle Scholar
  49. Gleason RA, Laubhan MK, Euliss NH Jr (eds) (2008) Ecosystem services derived from wetland conservation practices in the United States Prairie Pothole Region with emphasis on USDA Conservation Reserve and Wetland Reserve Programs. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1745. USGS, Reston, Virginia, USAGoogle Scholar
  50. Hall TF, Smith GE (1955) Effects of flooding on woody plants, west sandy dewatering project, Kentucky reservoir. J For 53:281–285Google Scholar
  51. Hardin ED, Wistendahl WA (1983) The effects of floodplain trees on herbaceous vegetation patterns, microtopography and litter. Bull Torrey Bot Club 110:23–30Google Scholar
  52. Harms WR, Schreuder HT, Hook DD, Brown CL (1980) The effects of flooding on the swamp forest in Lake Ocklawaha, Florida. Ecology 61:1412–1421Google Scholar
  53. Heavrin CA (1981) Boxes, baskets and boards: a history of Anderson-Tully company. Memphis State University Press, MemphisGoogle Scholar
  54. Hodges JD (1997) Development and ecology of bottomland hardwood sites. For Ecol Manage 90:117–126Google Scholar
  55. Hopkinson CS (1985) Shallow water benthic and pelagic metabolism: evidence for heterotrophy in the nearshore. Mar Biol 87:19–32Google Scholar
  56. Howarth R, Chan F, Conley D, Garnier J, Doney SC, Marino R, Billen G (2011) Coupled biogeochemical cycles: eutrophication and hypoxia in temperate estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 9(1):18–26Google Scholar
  57. Huenneke LF, Sharitz RR (1986) Microsite abundance and distribution of woody seedlings in a South Carolina cypress-tupelo swamp. Am Midl Nat 115:328–335Google Scholar
  58. Hupp CR, Osterkamp WR (1985) Bottomland vegetation distribution along Passage Creek, Virginia, in relation to fluvial landforms. Ecology 66:670–681Google Scholar
  59. Hupp CR, Walbridge MR, Lockaby BG (2005) Fluvial geomorphic processes and landforms, water quality, and nutrients in bottomland hardwood forests of southeastern USA. In: Fredrickson LH, King SL, Kaminski RM (eds) Ecology and management of bottomland hardwood systems: the state of our understanding. Gaylord Memorial Laboratory Special Publication No. 10, Puxico, University of Missouri-Columbia, pp 37–55Google Scholar
  60. Hupp CR, Pierce AR, Noe GB (2009) Floodplain geomorphic processes and environmental impacts of human alteration along coastal plain rivers, USA. Wetlands 29:413–429Google Scholar
  61. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  62. Johnson LA, Haukos DA, Smith LA, McMurry ST (2011) Loss of playa wetlands caused by reclassification and remapping of hydric soils on the southern high plains. Wetlands 31:483–492Google Scholar
  63. Jones RH, Sharitz RR (1998) Survival and growth of woody plant seedlings in the understory of floodplain forests in South Carolina. Ecology 86:574–587Google Scholar
  64. Jones RH, Sharitz RR, Dixon PM, Segal DS, Schneider RL (1994) Woody plant regeneration in four floodplain forests. Ecol Monogr 64:345–367Google Scholar
  65. Junk WJ, Wantzen KM (2006) Flood pulsing and the development and maintenance of biodiversity in floodplains. In: Batzer DP, Sharitz RR (eds) Ecology of freshwater and estuarine wetlands. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 407–435Google Scholar
  66. Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river flood plain systems. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 106:110–127Google Scholar
  67. Kadlec RH, Bevis FB (2009) Wastewater treatment at the Houghton Lake wetland: vegetation response. Ecol Eng 35:1312–1332Google Scholar
  68. Kadlec RH, Wallace S (2009) Treatment wetlands. CRS Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  69. Kandus P, Quintana RD, Minotti, PG, Del Pilar Oddi J, Baigún C, González Trilla G, Ceballos D (2009) Ecosistemas de humedal y una perspectiva hidrogeomórfica como marco para la valoración ecológica de sus bienes y servicios. In: Laterra P, Jobbagy E, Paruelo J (eds) Valoración de servicios ecosistémicos: conceptos, herramientas y aplicaciones para el ordenamiento territorial. Ediciones INTA, Buenos Aires, pp 265–290.Google Scholar
  70. Karlin EF (1995) Population growth and the global environment: an ecological perspective. In: Makofske WJ, Karlin EF (eds) Technology, development and global environmental issues. Harper Collins, New York, pp 19–37Google Scholar
  71. Keannish MJ (1986) Ecology of estuaries. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  72. Kellison RC, Young MJ, Braham RR, Jones EJ (1998) Major alluvial floodplains. In: Messina MG, Conner WH (eds) Southern forested wetlands-ecology and management. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  73. Kelly CA, Rudd JM, Bodaly RA, Roulet NP, St. Louis VL, Heyes A, Moore TR, Schiff S, Aravena R, Scott KJ, Dyck B, Harris R, Warner B, Edwards G (1997) Increases in fluxes of greenhouse gases and methyl mercury following flooding of an experimental reservoir. Environ Sci Technol 31:1334–1344Google Scholar
  74. Keough JR, Thompson TA, Guntenspergen GR, Wilcox DA (1999) Hydrogeomorphic factors and ecosystem responses in coastal wetlands of the Great Lakes. Wetlands 19:821–834Google Scholar
  75. King SL (1995) Effects of flooding regime on two impounded bottomland hardwood stands. Wetlands 15:272–284Google Scholar
  76. Kirwan ML, Guntenspergen GR (2010) Influence of tidal range on the stability of coastal marshland. J Geophys Res 115:F02009, doi: 10.1029/2009JF001400
  77. Kneib RT, Wagner SL (1994) Nekton use of vegetated marsh habitats at different stages of tidal inundation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 106:227–238Google Scholar
  78. Krantzberg G, DeBoer C (2008) A valuation of great lakes ecological services in the Laurentian great lakes basin with an emphasis on Canada. J Am Water Works Assoc 100:100–111Google Scholar
  79. LaBaugh JW (1989) Chemical characteristics of water in northern prairie wetlands. In: van der Valk A (ed) Northern prairie wetlands. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  80. LaBaugh JW, Winter TC, Swanson GA, Rosenberry DO, Nelson RD, Euliss NH Jr (1996) Changes in atmospheric patterns affect midcontinent wetlands sensitive to climate. Limnol Oceanogr 41:864–870Google Scholar
  81. Larson G, Schaetzl R (2001) Origin and evolution of the Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 27:518–546Google Scholar
  82. Lellis-Dibble KA, McGlynn KE, Bigford TE (2008) Estuarine fish and shellfish species in U.S. commercial and recreational fisheries: economic value as an incentive to protect and restore estuarine habitat. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFSF/SPO-90, 94 ppGoogle Scholar
  83. Lissey A (1971) Depression-focused transient groundwater flow patterns in Manitoba. Geological Association of Canada, Special paper 9, pp 333–341Google Scholar
  84. Loomis J, Kent P, Strange L, Fausch K, Covich A (2000) Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol Econ 33(1):103–117Google Scholar
  85. Luo HR, Smith LM, Allen BL, Haukos DA (1997) Effects of sedimentation on playa wetland volume. Ecol Appl 7:247–252Google Scholar
  86. Mahall BE, Park RB (1976) The ecotone between spartina foliosa trin. And salicornia virginica L. In salt marshes of northern San Francisco Bay: I. Biomass and production. J Ecol 64:421–433Google Scholar
  87. McCleery D (1999) When is a landscape natural? For Landowner 58:28–31Google Scholar
  88. McCully P (1996) Silenced rivers: the ecology and politics of large dams. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  89. McKee KL, Mendelssohn IA, Materne MD (2004) Acute salt marsh dieback in the Mississippi River deltaic plain: a drought-induced phenomenon? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13(1):65–73Google Scholar
  90. McWilliams WH, Rosson JF Jr (1990) Composition and vulnerability of bottomland hardwood forests of the Coastal Plain province in the south central United States. For Ecol Manage 33(34):485–501Google Scholar
  91. Mechenich C, Kraft GJ, Szczytko SW, Mechanich DJ (2006) Assessment of coastal water resources and watershed conditions at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore. National Park Service Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/361, Ashland, WIGoogle Scholar
  92. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AG, Zhao ZC (2007) Global climate projections. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 747–784Google Scholar
  93. Mendelssohn IA, McKee KL, Hester MW, Lin Q, McGinnis T, Willis JM (2006) Brown Marsh Task II.1: integrative approach to understanding the causes of salt marsh dieback – determination of salt marsh species tolerance limits to potential environmental stressors. Report submitted to the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Baton Rouge, LAGoogle Scholar
  94. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  95. Mitch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 2nd edn. Wiiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  96. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  97. Mitsch WJ, Day JW, Gilliam JW, Groffman PM, Hey DL, Randall GW, Wang N (2001) Reducing nitrogen loading to the gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi river basin: strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem. BioScience 51:373–388Google Scholar
  98. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG, Anderson CJ, Zhang L (2009) Wetland ecosystems. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  99. Munoz-Reinoso JC (2001) Vegetation changes and groundwater abstraction in SW Donana, Spain. J Hydrol 242:197–209Google Scholar
  100. National Research Council (NRC) (1997) Striking a balance: improving stewardship of marine areas. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  101. Neal JT (1965) Geology, mineralogy and hydrology of U.S. playas. U.S. Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Office of Aerospace Research, Bedford, MA, USA, Environmental Research Paper 96Google Scholar
  102. Neff BP, Nicholas JR (2005) Uncertainty in the Great Lakes water balance. USGS science investigations report 2004–5100, 42 ppGoogle Scholar
  103. Nelson KA, Reiten JC (2006) Saline seep impacts on Hailstone and Halfbreed National Wildlife Refuges. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 Contaminants Program, Denver, CO, USA. DEC ID: 20016000001, FFS: 61130-6 N47Google Scholar
  104. Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett V, Codignotto J, Hay J, McLean R, Ragoonaden S, Woodroffe C (2007) Coastal systems and low-lying areas. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Janson CE (eds) Climate change impacts, adaptations and vulnerability. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, working group 2, fourth assessment report. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 316–356Google Scholar
  105. Odum WE (1988) Comparative ecology of tidal fresh-water and salt marshes. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:147–176Google Scholar
  106. Ohlendorf HA, Hoffman DJ, Saiki MK, Aldrich TW (1986) Embryonic mortality and abnormalities of aquatic birds: apparent impacts by selenium from irrigation drainwater. Sci Total Environ 52:49–63Google Scholar
  107. Parsons ML, Dortch Q, Turner RE, Rabalais NR (2006) Reconstructing the development of eutrophication in Louisiana salt marshes. Limnol Oceanogr 51(1, part 2):534–544Google Scholar
  108. Pate J, Loomis J (1997) The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecol Econ 20(3):199–207Google Scholar
  109. Penland S, Mendelssohn I, Wayne L, Britsch D (1996) Natural and human causes of coastal land loss in Louisiana – workshop summary . Coastal Studies Institute, Wetland Biogeochemistry Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 25 ppGoogle Scholar
  110. Pennings SC, Grant MB, Bertness MD (2005) Plant zonation in low-altitude salt marshes: disentangling the roles of flooding, salinity and competition. J Ecol 93:159–167Google Scholar
  111. Peterjohn WT, Correll DL (1984) Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65(5):1466–1475Google Scholar
  112. Petri LR, Larson LR (1973) Quality of water in selected lakes of eastern South Dakota. South Dakota Water Resources Commission Report No. 1Google Scholar
  113. Pinchot G, Ashe WW (1897) Timber trees and forests of North Carolina. North Carolina Geological Survey, Bulletin Number 6, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  114. Playa Lakes Joint Venture (2010).
  115. Raffaelli D, Karakassis I, Galloway A (1991) Zonation schemes on sandy shores: a multivariate approach. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 148:241–253Google Scholar
  116. Raupauch MR, Raynerw PJ, Barrett DJ, DeFries RS, Heimann M, Ojima DS, Quegan S, Schmulliu CC (2005) Model-data synthesis in terrestrial carbon observation: methods, data requirements and data uncertainty specifications. Glob Chang Biol 11:378–397Google Scholar
  117. Richardson CJ (1983) Pocosins: vanishing wastelands or valuable wetlands? BioScience 33(10):626–633Google Scholar
  118. Richter KO, Azous AL (1995) Amphibian occurrence and wetland characteristics in the Puget Sound Basin. Wetlands 15:305–312Google Scholar
  119. Rodríguez JP, Beard TD, Agard J, Bennett E, Cork S, Cumming G, Deane D, Lodge DM, Mutale M, Nelson GC, Peterson GD, Ribeiro T, Carpenter SR, Pingali PL, Bennett EM, Zurek MB (2005) Interactions among ecosystem services. Millennium ecosystem assessment, ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios, vol 2. Findings of the scenarios working group. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  120. Samson F, Knopf F (1996) Prairie conservation: preserving North America’s most endangered ecosystem. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  121. Scavia D, Field JC, Boesch DF, Buddemeier RW, Cayan DR, Burkett V, Fogarty M, Fogarty M, Harwell M, Howarth R, Mason C, Reed DJ, Royer TC, Sallenger AH, Titus JG (2002) Climate change impacts on U.S. coastal and marine ecosystems. Estuaries 25(2):149–164Google Scholar
  122. Schneider RL, Martin NE, Sharitz RR (1989) Impact of dam operations on hydrology and associated floodplain forests of southeastern rivers. In: Sharitz RR, Gibbons JW (eds) Freshwater wetlands and wildlife: perspectives on natural, managed and degraded ecosystems. Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge, TN. CONF-8603101, U.S. Department of Energy Symposium Series Number 61, pp 1113–1122Google Scholar
  123. Sharitz RR, Mitsch WJ (1993) Southern floodplain forests. In: Martin WH, Boyce SG, Echternacht AC (eds) Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: Lowland Terrestrial Communities. Wiley, New York, pp 311–372Google Scholar
  124. Sharitz RR, Schneider RL, Lee LC (1990) Composition and regeneration of a disturbed river floodplain forest in South Carolina. In: Gosselink JG, Lee LC, Muir TA (eds) Ecological processes and cumulative impacts. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, pp 195–218Google Scholar
  125. Shepard JP, Brady SJ, Cost ND, Stors CJ (1998) Classification and inventory. In: Messina MG, Conner WH (eds) Southern forested wetlands: ecology and management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 3–28Google Scholar
  126. Skorupa JP, Ohlendorf HM (1991) Contaminants in drainage water and avian risk thresholds. In: Dinar A, Zilberman D (eds) The economics and management of water and drainage in agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  127. Sloan CE (1972) Ground-water hydrology of prairie potholes in North Dakota: U.S. Geological survey professional paper 585-C. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 28 ppGoogle Scholar
  128. Smith LM (2003) Playas of the great plains. University of Texas Press, Austin, 257 ppGoogle Scholar
  129. Smith LM, Euliss NH Jr, Wilcox DA, Brinson MM (2008) Application of a geomorphic and temporal perspective to wetland management in North America. Wetlands 28:563–577Google Scholar
  130. Smith LM, Haukos DA, McMurry ST, LaGrange T, Willis D (2011) Ecosystem services provided by playa wetlands in the High Plains: potential influences of USDA conservation programs and practices. Ecol Appl 21:S82–S92Google Scholar
  131. Smith RD, Ammann A, Bartoldus C, Brinson MM (1995) An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Technical Report WRP-DE-9, 71p.Google Scholar
  132. Sparks RE (1996) Ecosystem effects: positive and negative outcomes. In: Changnon SA (ed) The great flood of 1993. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 132–162Google Scholar
  133. Stein EC, Mattson M, Fetscher AE, Halama KJ (2004) Influence of geologic setting on slope wetland hydrodynamics. Wetlands 24:244–260Google Scholar
  134. Sterman JD, Sweeney LB (2002) Cloudy skies: assessing public understanding of global warming. Syst Dyn Rev 18:207–240Google Scholar
  135. Stone RO (1956) A geological investigation of playa lakes. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  136. Swanson FJ, Kratz TK, Caine N, Woodmansee RG (1988) Landform effects on ecosystem patterns and processes. BioScience 38:92–98Google Scholar
  137. Swarzenski CM, Doyle TW, Frye B, Hargis TG (2008) Biogeochemical response of organic-rich freshwater marshes in the Louisiana delta plain to chronic river water influx. Biogeochemistry 90:49–63Google Scholar
  138. Tangen BA, Gleason RA (2008) Reduction of sedimentation and nutrient loading. In: Gleason RA, Laubhan MK, Euliss NH Jr (eds) Ecosystem services derived from wetland conservation practices in the United States Prairie Pothole Region with an emphasis on the U.S. Department of Agriculture Conservation Reserve and Wetlands Reserve Programs, Professional paper 1745, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  139. Titus JH (1990) Microtopography and woody plant regeneration in a hardwood floodplain swamp in Florida. Bull Torrey Bot Club 117:429–437Google Scholar
  140. United Nations (2008) Population division of the department of economic and social affairs of the United Nations secretariat, world population prospects, The 2008 revision.
  141. United Nations Development Programme (2003) Human development report 2003, millennium development goals: a compact among nations to end human poverty. Oxford University Press, New York, 368 ppGoogle Scholar
  142. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2006) Marine and coastal ecosystems and human well-being: a synthesis report based on the findings of the millennium ecosystem assessment. United Nations, Nairobi, 76 ppGoogle Scholar
  143. Uzarski DG, Burton TM, Kolar RE, Cooper MJ (2009) The ecological impacts of fragmentation and vegetation removal in Lake Huron’s coastal wetlands. Aquat Ecosyst Heal Manage 12:45–62Google Scholar
  144. Vernadsky VI (1943) Some words about the Noösphere. Translated from Russian by Rachel Douglas (Executive intelligence review) from the original 1943 article and a 1945 translation by the author’s son. 21st Century, Spring 2005:16–21Google Scholar
  145. Walbridge MR (1993) Functions and values of forested wetlands in the southern United States. J For 91:15–19Google Scholar
  146. Weller MW (1988) Issues and approaches in assessing cumulative impacts on waterbird habitat in wetlands. Environ Manage 12:695–701Google Scholar
  147. Wharton CH (1980) Values and functions of bottomland hardwoods. Trans North Am Wildl Conf 45:341–353Google Scholar
  148. Wilcox DA, Krygier E Jr (2002) Private beach or emerging wetland? The controversy over grooming beaches exposed by low water. Great Lakes Advisor (Sept/Oct): 8–9Google Scholar
  149. Wilcox DA, Thompson TA, Booth RK, Nicholas JR (2007) Lake-level variability and water availability in the Great Lakes. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1311, 25 ppGoogle Scholar
  150. Wilcox DA, Kowalski KP, Hoare H, Carlson ML, Morgan H (2008) Cattail invasion of sedge/grass meadows and regulation of Lake Ontario water levels: photointerpretation analysis of sixteen wetlands over five decades. J Great Lakes Res 34:301–323Google Scholar
  151. Willis K (2001) 73 new wetlands created in southwestern North Dakota. Birdscapes 2001:12Google Scholar
  152. Winter TC (1989) Hydrologic studies of wetlands in the Northern Prairie. In: van der Valk AG (ed) Northern Prairie wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 16–54Google Scholar
  153. Winter TC (1999) Relation of streams, lakes and wetlands to groundwater flow systems. Hydrogeol J 7:28–45Google Scholar
  154. Woods SW, MacDonald LH, Westbrook CJ (2006) Hydrologic interactions between an alluvial fan and a slope wetland in the central Rocky Mountains, USA. Wetlands 26:230–243Google Scholar
  155. Woodward RT, Wui YS (2001) The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecol Econ 37:257–270Google Scholar
  156. Yin Y, Nelson JC, Swenson GV, Langrehr HA, Blackburn TA (1994) Tree mortality in the upper Mississippi River and floodplain following an extreme flood in 1993. LTRMP 94-SO11. National Biological Service, Illinois Natural Survey, Iowa Department of Natural Resources, and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Long Term Resource Monitoring Program 1993 Flood Observations, Environmental Management Technical Center, Onalaska, WIGoogle Scholar
  157. Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Smith A, Barry TL, Coe AL, Brown PR, Brenchley P, Cantrill D, Gale A, Gibbard P, Gregory FJ, Hounslow MW, Kerr AC, Pearson P, Knox R, Powell J, Water C, Marshall J, Oates M, Rawson P, Stone P (2008) Are we now living in the Anthropocene? GSA Today 18:4–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyNorthern Prairie Wildlife Research CenterJamestownUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  3. 3.Forestry and Natural ResourcesClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  4. 4.U.S. Geological SurveyManyUSA
  5. 5.Department of Environmental Science and BiologyThe College at Brockport-State University of New YorkBrockportUSA
  6. 6.Department of BiologyUniversity of Louisiana-LafayetteLafayetteUSA
  7. 7.Department of Earth System Science and PolicyUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA

Personalised recommendations