Advertisement

Working with “Translocality”: Conceptual Implications and Analytical Consequences

  • Katrin BromberEmail author
Chapter
Part of the United Nations University Series on Regionalism book series (UNSR, volume 6)

Abstract

The term translocality evolved during the mid-1990s in discussions about the social production of place and space. It goes beyond geographical notions and questions cultures as closed entities bound to nation states. The inflationary and often unreflected use of “trans-terminology” (trans-nationalism, trans-culturalism, trans-gender) exposed such words to the danger of becoming empty signifiers – catchall phrases completely lacking any theoretical or analytical value. The paper, therefore, interrogates translocality with regard to its diverse conceptualizations as a research perspective, a middle-range theory or a social fact, its potential added value and its operational limits. Taking the example of the Indian Ocean – a seascape that is produced and transformed through movement – the paper discusses one possible gateway to the study of a translocal phenomenon.

Keywords

Indian Ocean Cultural Landscape Western Indian Ocean Operational Concept East African Coast 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Appadurai, A. (1995). The production of locality. In R. Fardon (Ed.), Counterworks. Managing the diversity of knowledge (pp. 204–225). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben Arrous, M. (2004). La translocalité, pour quoi faire? In S. Wippel & L. Marfaing (Eds.), Les relations transsahariennes à l’époque contemporaine. Un espace en constante mutation (pp. 415–442). Paris/Berlin: Karthala – ZMO.Google Scholar
  3. Braudel, F. (1949). La Méditerranée et le Monde Méditerranéen a l’époque de Philippe II (Vol. 3). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  4. Bromber, K. (2002). Who are the Zanzibari? newspaper debates on difference, 1948–1964. In J.-G. Deutsch & B. Reinwald (Eds.), Space on the move. Transformations of the Indian Ocean seascape in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (pp. 75–89). Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Bromber, K. (2009). Imperiale Propaganda. Die ostafrikanische Militärpresse im Zweiten Weltkrieg. ZMO-Studien 28. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Chernillo, D. (2006). Social theory’s methodological nationalism. Myth and reality. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, F. (2001). What is the concept of globalization good for? An African historian’s perspective. African Affairs, 100, 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Jong, F. (1999). The production of translocality. Initiation in the sacred grove in southern Senegal. In R. Fardon, W. van Binsbergen, & R. van Dijk (Eds.), Modernity on a shoestring. Dimensions of globalization, consumption and development in Africa and beyond. EIDOS: Leiden and London.Google Scholar
  9. Freitag, U., & von Oppen, A. (2010). Introduction. ‘Translocality’: An approach to connection and transfer in area studies. In U. Freitag & A. von Oppen (Eds.), Translocality. The study of globalising processes from a southern perspective. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glassman, J. (2011). War of stones. Racial thought and violence in colonial Zanzibar. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hamzah, D. (2005). Peter Mandaville, transnational Muslim politics: Reimagining the Umma, London: Routledge, 2001, 235 S. The Middle East Studies Association Bulletin, 39(1), 117–119.Google Scholar
  12. Hartwig, F. (2002). The segmentation of the Indian Ocean region. Arabs and the implementation of immigration regulations in Zanzibar and British east Africa. In B. Reinwald & J.-G. Deutsch (Eds.), Space on the move. Transformations of the Indian Ocean seascape in the nineteenth and twentieth century (pp. 21–38). Berlin: Klaus Schwarz.Google Scholar
  13. Hirsch, E. (1995). Landscape: Between place and space. In E. Hirsch & M. Hanlon (Eds.), The anthropology of landscape. Perspectives on place and space (pp. 1–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Koselleck, R. (2002). The practice of conceptual history. Timing history: Spacing concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Koselleck, R. (2003). Zeitschichten. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  16. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Donald Nicholsen-Smith, Trans). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Luig, U., & von Oppen, A. (1997). Landscape in Africa: Process and vision. An introductory essay. In U. Luig & A. von Oppen (Eds.), The making of African landscapes. Steiner: Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  18. Mandaville, P. G. (2001). Transnational Muslim politics, reimagining the umma. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nietzsche, F. (1973). Die fröhliche Wissenschaft. In G. Colli & M. Montinari (Eds.), Kritische Gesamtausgabe: Idyllen aus Messina. Die Fröhliche Wissenschaft. Nachgelassene Fragmente. Frühjahr 1881 bis Sommer 1882. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  20. Parkin, D., & Headley, S. C. (2000). Islamic prayer across the Indian Ocean. Inside and outside the mosque. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Prins, A. H. J. (1965). Sailing from lamu. A study of Islamic culture in Islamic east Africa. Assen: van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  22. Reinwald, B. (2002). Space on the move. Perspectives on the making of the Indian Ocean seascape. In B. Reinwald & J.-G. Deutsch (Eds.), Space on the move. Transformations of the Indian Ocean seascape in the nineteenth and twentieth century. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz.Google Scholar
  23. Vertovec, S. (2001). Migration and other modes of transnationalism: Towards conceptual cross-fertilization. 1. http://rimd.reduaz.mx/documentos_miembros/1840116.pdf Accessed 16 Mar 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zentrum Moderner Orient (ZMO)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations