Advertisement

Theorizing Regionalism(s): When “Regions” Emerge and Interact

  • Ulrike Lorenz-CarlEmail author
  • Frank Mattheis
Chapter
Part of the United Nations University Series on Regionalism book series (UNSR, volume 6)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the competing and complementing theoretical perspectives dealing with the phenomenon of regionalism. The authors discuss the state of the art in approaches from the main disciplines dealing with regional integration, namely International Relations, New Regionalism and Critical Political Geography. Drawing from these currents, an extended notion of the region as a social space and arena for a multiplicity of actors is developed in such a way as to include its specific occurrence in the South. The authors outline interregionalism as an emergence of regional interaction that brings out certain unvalued characteristics of regions in their institutionalised form. Empirical evidence from the South Atlantic illustrates the character of interregionalism outside of Europe.

Keywords

Regional Organisation Regional Integration Regional Governance Custom Union European Economic Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adler, E. (1997). Imagined security communities. Cognitive regions in international relations. Journal of International Studies, 26(2), 249–277.Google Scholar
  2. Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap. The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agnew, J. (1999). Region on the mind does not equal region of the mind. Progress in Human Geography, 23(1), 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agnew, J. (2000). From the political economy of regions to regional political economy. Progress in Human Geography, 24(1), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agnew, J. (2008). Borders on the mind. Re-framing border thinking. Ethics & Global Politics, 1(4), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Auerbach, N. (2007). The meanings of neoliberalism. In R. K. Roy, A. Denzau, & T. Willett (Eds.), Neoliberalism: Global experiments with a shared mental model (pp. 26–50). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bach, D. (Ed.). (1999). Regionalisation in Africa. Integration and disintegration. Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
  8. Balassa, B. (1961). The theory of economic integration. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Baldwin, R. (2008). Big-think regionalism. A critical survey (NBER Working Paper 14056). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  10. Barroso, J. M. (2010). Keynote Speech at the GARNET 2010 Conference. Brussels.Google Scholar
  11. Bhagwati, J. N. (1991). The world trading system at risk. Harvester Wheatsheaf: Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
  12. Bøås, M., Marchand, M., & Shaw, T. (2005). The political economy of regions and regionalisms. An introduction to our critical, revisionist inquiries. In M. Bøås, M. Marchand, & T. Shaw (Eds.), The political economy of regions and regionalism (pp. 1–12). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  13. Brenner, N. (1999). Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society, 28, 39–78.Google Scholar
  14. Browning, C. (2003). The region-building approach revisited. The continued othering of Russia in discourse or region-building in the European north. Geopolitics, 8(1), 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bull, H. (2002). The anarchical society. A study of order in world politics. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  16. Bulmer-Thomas, V. (2001). Regional integration in Latin America and the Caribbean. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 20(3), 961–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cafruny, A., & Ryner, M. (2009). Critical political economy. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (pp. 221–240). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cairncross, F. (1997). The death of distance. How the communications revolution will change our lives. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  19. Deutsch, K. (1968). Political community and the north Atlantic area: International organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dykmann, K. (2006). Perceptions and politics: The foreign relations of the European union with Latin America. In Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Iberoamerika-Kunde, 63. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission. (1995). European community support for regional economic integration efforts among developing countries. COM(95)219. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  22. Faini, R., & Grilli, E. (Eds.). (1997). Multilateralism and regionalism after the Uruguay round. Basingstoke/New York: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fawn, R. (2009). ‘Regions’ and their study. Wherefrom, what for and whereto? Review of International Studies, 35(1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haas, M. (1958). The uniting of Europe. Political, social and economic forces 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Haas, M. (1970). International subsystems. Stability and polarity. The American Political Science Review, 64(1), 98–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Harrison, J. (2006). Re-reading the new regionalism. A sympathetic critique. Space and Polity, 10(1), 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Hettne, B. (2003). The new regionalism revisited. In F. Söderbaum & T. Shaw (Eds.), Theories of new regionalism (pp. 22–42). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Hettne, B. (2005). Beyond the “New” regionalism. New Political Economy, 10(4), 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (2000). Theorising the rise of regionness. New Political Economy, 5(3), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (2008). The future of regionalism. Old divides, new frontiers. In A. Cooper, C. Hughes, & P. De Lombaerde (Eds.), Regionalisation and global governance. The taming of globalisation? (pp. 61–95). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Higgott, R. (2005). The theory and practice of global and regional governance. Accommodating American exceptionalism and European pluralism. European Foreign Affairs Review, 10(4), 575–594.Google Scholar
  34. Hoffmann, S. (1964). The European process at Atlantic crosspurposes. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(1), 85–101.Google Scholar
  35. Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or obsolete? the fate of the nation state and the case of western Europe. Daedalus, 95(3), 862–915.Google Scholar
  36. Hurrell, A. (2007). One world? many worlds? the place of regions in the study of international society. International Affairs, 83(1), 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hveem, H. (1999). Political regionalism. Master or servant of economic internationalization? In H. Hettne, A. Inotai, & O. Sunkel (Eds.), Globalism and the new regionalism (pp. 85–115). Basingstoke/London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hveem, H. (2003). The regional project in global governance. In F. Söderbaum & T. Shaw (Eds.), Theories of new regionalism (pp. 81–98). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Jones, E. (2009). The economic mythology of European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(1), 89–109.Google Scholar
  40. Katzenstein, P. (2005). A world of regions. Asia and Europe in the American imperium. New York: Ithaca.Google Scholar
  41. Krugman, P. (1991). Is bilateralism bad? In E. Helpman & A. Razin (Eds.), International trade and trade policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Krugman, P. (1993). Regionalism vs. Multilateralism. Analytic notes. In J. De Melo & A. Panagariya (Eds.), New dimensions in regional integration (pp. 84–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lawrence, R. (1999). Regionalism, multilateralism, and deeper integration. Changing paradigms for developing countries. In R. Mendoza, P. Low, & B. Kotschwar (Eds.), Trade rules in the making. Challenges in regional and multilateral negotiations (pp. 23–46). Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  44. Lee, M. (2003). The political economy of regionalism in southern Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Lévy, J. (1999). Le tournant géographique. Penser l’espace pour lire le monde. Paris: Berlin.Google Scholar
  47. Lorenz-Carl, U. & Rempe, M. (Eds.) (2013). Mapping Agency. Comparing Regionalisms in Africa. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  48. Lorenz, U. (2010). Negotiating regions, reordering international relations? the economic partnership agreements as signifier for a new global order. Journal of International Relations and Development, 14(1), 50–60.Google Scholar
  49. Lorenz, U. (2011). Negotiating trade agreements, transforming regional order. The economic partnership agreement negotiations between the EU and Southern Africa. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Leipzig, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  50. Lorenz, U., & Cornelissen, S. (2011). Regional organisation, regional Arena. The SADC in southern Africa. In T. Shaw, J. A. Grant, & S. Cornelissen (Eds.), Research companion to regionalisms (pp. 240–255). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  51. Lovering, J. (1999). Theory led by policy. The inadequacies of the “new regionalism”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Majluf, L. A. (2004). Swimming in the spaghetti bowl. Challenges for developing countries under the “new regionalism”. New York/Geneva: UNCTAD. Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series, No. 27.Google Scholar
  53. Marchand, M., Bøås, M., & Shaw, T. (1999). The political economy of new regionalisms. Third World Quarterly, 20(5), 897–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Merrifield, A. (2002). Henri Lefebvre. A socialist in space. In M. Crang & N. Thrift (Eds.), Thinking space (pp. 167–182). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and power in the European community. A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 473–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Neumann, I. (2003). A region-building approach. In F. Söderbaum & T. Shaw (Eds.), Theories of new regionalism (pp. 160–178). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Nye, J. (1968). Patterns and catalysts in regional integration. In J. Nye (Ed.), International regionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Paasi, A. (2001). Europe as social process and discourse. Considerations of place, boundaries and identity. European Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 8(1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Paasi, A. (2004). Place and region. Looking through the prism of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 28(4), 536–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Paasi, A. (2009). The resurgence of the “region” and “regional identity”. theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe. Review of International Studies, 35(1), 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pomfret, R. (1997). Development economics. Prentice Hall: London/New York.Google Scholar
  62. Purcell, M. (2003). Islands of practice and the Marston/Brenner debate. Towards a more synthetic critical human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 27(3), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Russett, B. (1967). International regions and the international system. A study in political ecology. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.Google Scholar
  64. Sandholtz, W., & Stone Sweet, A. (1998). European integration and supranational governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sassen, S. (Ed.). (2007). Deciphering the global. Its scales, spaces and subjects. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Schiff, M., & Winters, L. A. (2003). Regional integration and development. Washington, DC/Oxford: World Bank, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schirm, S. (2002). Globalization and the new regionalism. Global markets, domestic politics and regional cooperation. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  68. Schroer, M. (2008). “Bringing the space back in” – Zur Relevanz des Raumes als soziologische Kategorie. In J. Döring & T. Thielmann (Eds.), Spatial turn. Das Raumparadigma in den Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 125–148). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  69. Söderbaum, F. (2004). The political economy of regionalism. The case of southern Africa. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Söderbaum, F., & Shaw, T. (Eds.). (2003). Theories of new regionalism. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  71. Söderbaum, F., & Taylor, I. (Eds.). (2003). Regionalism and uneven development in southern Africa. The case of the Maputo development corridor. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  72. South African Institute of International Affairs. (1999). Exploring south-south dialogue: Mercosur in Latin America and SADC in southern Africa. Johannesburg: SAIIA.Google Scholar
  73. Taylor, I. (2010). The international relations of Sub-Saharan Africa. New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  74. Tuathail, G. Ó., & Luke, T. (1994). Present at the (Dis)integration. Deterritorialization and reterritorialization in the new wor(l)d order. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(3), 381–398.Google Scholar
  75. Viner, J. (1950). The customs union issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  76. Warleigh, A., & Rosamond. B. (2006, April 25–30). Theorising regional integration comparatively. An Introduction. Paper to the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus.Google Scholar
  77. Warleigh-Lack, A. (2008). Studying regionalisation comparatively. A conceptual framework. In A. Cooper, C. Hughes, & P. De Lombaerde (Eds.), Regionalisation and global governance. The taming of globalisation? (pp. 43–60). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Weichhart, P. (1995). Die region. Chimäre, artefakt Oder strukturprinzip sozialer systeme? In G. Brunn (Ed.), Region und Regionsbildung in Europa (pp. 25–43). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Social SciencesUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  2. 2.Centre for Area StudiesUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations