Advertisement

Concluding Remarks: Regionalizing Oman Beyond Conventional Metageographies

  • Steffen WippelEmail author
Chapter
Part of the United Nations University Series on Regionalism book series (UNSR, volume 6)

Abstract

The conclusion sums up the multiplex regionalisation processes, of which Oman, its people and society are part. They point in different geographical directions and occur on multiple spatial scales. Besides larger world regions, intranational and transborder regionalisation takes place. Regional belonging, however, is not unidimensional; rather, actors and places are located in or between several regional contexts. Contributing to this is not only the central state as a unitary actor, but also a great variety of individual and collective social actors within and outside the state and the country. They are part of and act in a large range of political, economic, social and cultural fields and are of different geographical and social origin. In this context, other geographical perspectives emerge, e.g. on specific Omani “trade” or “migration regions” besides those in other social fields and from other local standpoints. Contributions to this volume also show the importance of discourses and symbols and of historical aspects. Finally, region-making can be regarded from different conceptual angles, from different observers’ and actors’ viewpoints and with quite different foci and underlying questions. To close, the author points to the need for further investigation on Oman and the Gulf area from a regional perspective.

Keywords

Indian Ocean Arab Country Arab World Gulf Cooperation Council Social Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Al-Sayegh, F. (2002). The UAE and Oman: Opportunities and challenges in the twenty-first century. Middle East Policy, 9(3), 124–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gabriel, E. (1999). Zur Grenzbildung in Arabien. Geographische Rundschau, 51(11), 593–599.Google Scholar
  3. Kelly, J. B. (1956). The Buraimi Oasis Dispute. International Affairs, 32(3), 318–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Krause, R. F. (2001). Wem gehört der Golf? Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, 145(2), 14–17.Google Scholar
  5. Mühlböck, M. F. (2010, March 26). The history of tribes in Dhofar: Transnational links. Paper presented at the international conference “Regionalizing Oman – Political, Economic and Social Dynamics”, Department of Economics and Social Geography of the Middle East and North Africa, Institute of Oriental Studies, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
  6. Scholz, F. (1980). Sultanate of Oman. Part 1: A geographical introduction to the country of Oman, its natural resources, its people, its settlements, its economy, and its modern development (reader). Stuttgart: Ernst Klett.Google Scholar
  7. Steinbeck, E. G. (1962). Zur Frage der Grenzen in Südost-Arabien. The question of boundaries in South East Arabia. Orient, 3(1), 14–19.Google Scholar
  8. Steinbeck, E. G. (1965). Zur Frage der Grenzen in Trucial Oman. Orient, 6(4/5), 134–137.Google Scholar
  9. UN – United Nations, Office of Legal Affairs, Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea. (2010). Oman. Updated 9 September. http://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/STATEFILES/OMN.htm. Accessed 13 April 2012.
  10. Valeri, M. (2007). Le sultanat d’Oman: Une révolution en trompe-l’œil. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zentrum Moderner Orient (ZMO)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations