Advertisement

Domesticating Local Elites. Sheikhs, Walis and State-Building Under Sultan Qaboos

  • Marc ValeriEmail author
Chapter
Part of the United Nations University Series on Regionalism book series (UNSR, volume 6)

Abstract

The political promotion of a new national identity centred on the person of Qaboos has decisively served the ruler’s strategy of legitimisation since the end of the 1970s. Nevertheless, this process of substitution of identities from the “local” to the “national” was not supposed to lead to the extinction of local solidarities (tribes, ethno-linguistic groups etc.). Far from eradicating them, the regime has worked to tame them and neutralise their impact by encapsulating them within the state and making them more and more dependent on a game controlled by the central state.

From this perspective, this chapter focuses on the role of one type of political personnel that is crucial for understanding the political relationship between the centre and the periphery in Oman: the local notables. While the most important sheikhs have been offered economic opportunities and top positions in the state apparatus, the regime also hastened to attract minor notables into the system by “bureaucratizing” them as official intermediaries between individuals and the public administration. As a result, no social recognition remains beside that granted by the state, which has appropriated the symbolic spaces that local authorities controlled before 1970.

Keywords

State Council State Apparatus Islamic Bank Local Elite Royal Decree 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Eickelman, D. F. (1984). Kings and people: Oman’s state consultative council. Middle East Journal, 31(1), 51–71.Google Scholar
  2. Eickelman, D. F. (1990). Identité nationale et discours religieux en Oman. In G. Kepel & Y. Richard (Eds.), Intellectuels et militants de l’Islam contemporain (pp. 103–128). Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  3. Gause, G. (2000). The persistence of monarchy in the Arabian Peninsula: A comparative analysis. In J. Kostiner (Ed.), Middle East monarchies. The challenge of modernity (pp. 167–186). Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  4. Geertz, C. (1963). The integrative revolution. Primordial sentiments and civil politics in the new states. In C. Geertz (Ed.), Old societies and new states. The quest for modernity in Asia and Africa (pp. 105–157). London: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  5. Ibn Khaldun. (1980). The Muqaddimah: An introduction to history (F. Rosenthal, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. James, A. E. (2011, May 30). Windows open for Islamic Banking Units. Times of Oman. http://www.timesofoman.com/archivesdetails.asp?detail=45589.
  7. Peterson, J. E. (2004). The emergence of post-traditional Oman (Durham Middle East Papers, Sir William Luce Publication Series, Sir William Luce Fellowship Paper, 5, 22 pp.). http://www.jepeterson.net/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/Emergence_of_Post-Traditional_Oman.pdf.
  8. Peterson, J. E. (2007). Oman’s insurgencies: The sultanate’s struggle for supremacy. London: Saqi.Google Scholar
  9. Valeri, M. (2010). High visibility, low profile: The Shi‘a in Oman under Sultan Qaboos. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 42(4), 251–268.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Arab and Islamic StudiesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations