Skip to main content

Immanent Transcendence in Educational Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover A Companion to Research in Education
  • 4085 Accesses

Abstract

In discussing modernism versus post-modernism, positing “transcendent” universal and “immanent” local standards as contrary opposites works as an inhibiting straitjacket. This comment on Marianna Papastephanou’s article attempts to support and reinforce her critical theorist intentions to overcome this opposition by invoking viewpoints from the philosophy of Aristotle, interpreted as a dialectical philosopher in light of the totality of the Corpus Aristotelicum, not by isolating his practical from his theoretical philosophy. The argument is that immanent transcendence is both possible and necessary in every local human culture, already implied in the concept of immanent critique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational learning – a theory of action perspective. Addison Wesley Longman, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T, Jones L (2001) Action research and postmodernism – congruence and critique. Open University Press, Buckingham/Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr W, Kemmis S (2005) Staying critical. Educ Action Res 13(3):347–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikeland O (2006) The validity of action research – validity in action research. In: Aagaard Nielsen K, Svensson L (eds) Action and interactive research: beyond theory and practice. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht and Aachen, pp 193–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikeland O (2008) The Ways of Aristotle: Aristotelian Phrónêsis, Aristotelian Philosophy of Dialogue, and Action Research. Peter Lang Publishers, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott J (2005) Becoming critical: the failure to connect. Educ Action Res 13(3):359–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (1978/1739–40) A treatise of human nature. Selby-Bigge and Nidditch, 2nd edn. Clarendon/Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (1969) On Certainty [Über Gewissheit]. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olav Eikeland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eikeland, O. (2014). Immanent Transcendence in Educational Research. In: Reid, A., Hart, E., Peters, M. (eds) A Companion to Research in Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics