Skip to main content

Educational Research as Science? A Critical Question

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Companion to Research in Education
  • 4138 Accesses

Abstract

‘Educational research as science?’ is a question that has been the subject of much heated debate. This short article aims to consider some of the key ideas we might invoke when attempting to conceive of educational research as science and in turn demonstrate that by considering the philosophy of science, and in particular Rowbottom’s piece, we can broaden our understanding of what counts as ‘scientific’ research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, Bredo (2009) notes that many students adopt a bipolar view of research methods.

  2. 2.

    Performance in GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education) Examinations in Vocational Subjects (GCSEvs), Invitation to Tender, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 2005.

  3. 3.

    Feuer et al. 2002 referring to the work of Stranges, Lakatos and Musgrave and Popper.

  4. 4.

    The idea that theoretical ideas emerge out of one’s data.

  5. 5.

    See Joanna Swann (2003) for a Popperian discussion of this issue.

References

  • Berliner DC (2002) Educational research: the hardest science of all. Educ Res 31(8):18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredo E (2009) Getting over methodology wars. Educ Res 38(6):441–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuer MJ, Towne L, Shavelson RJ (2002) Scientific culture and educational research. Educ Res 31(8):4–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves DH (1996) Teaching as a research-based profession: possibilities and prospects, teacher training agency annual lecture. Teacher Training Agency, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillgage J, Pearson R, Anderson A, Tamkin P (1998) Excellence in research on schools. Department for Education and Employment, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson P (2004) Research as a form of work: expertise, community and methodological objectivity. Br Educ Res J 30(1):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe KR (2009) Positivist dogmas, rhetoric, and the education science question. Educ Res 38(6):428–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RB (2009) Toward a more inclusive “Scientific Research in Education”. Educ Res 38(6):449–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather P (2004) Scientific research in education: a critical perspective. Br Educ Res J 30(6):759–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law J (2004) After method: mess in social science research. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley L (1996) Interrogating patriarchy: the challenges of feminist research. In: Morley L, Walsh V (eds) Breaking boundaries: women in higher education. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 128–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips DC (2013) A guide for the perplexed: scientific educational research, methodolatry, and the gold versus platinum standards. In: Reid AD, Hart EP, Peters MA (eds) A companion to research in education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 129–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1963) Conjectures and refutations. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowbottom DP, Aiston SJ (2006) The myth of “scientific method” in contemporary educational research. J Philos Educ 40(2):137–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowbottom DP, Aiston SJ (2010) The use and misuse to taxpayers’ money: publicly-funded educational research. Br Educ Res J, 37(4): 631–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven M (2013) The logic of causal investigations. In: Reid AD, Hart EP, Peters MA (eds) A companion to research in education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 163–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin RE (2002) Evidence-based education policies: transforming educational practice and research. Educ Res 31(7):15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeyers P (2013) The design(s) of educational research: description and interpretation. In: Reid AD, Hart EP, Peters MA (eds) A companion to research in education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • St Pierre EA (2002) “Science” rejects postmodernism. Educ Res 31(8):25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann J (2003) A Popperian approach to research on learning and method. In: Swann J, Pratt J (eds) Educational research in practice: making sense of methodology. Continuum, London, pp 11–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley J, Darby D (1998) Educational research – a critique: a survey of published educational research. Ofsted, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Aiston .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aiston, S. (2014). Educational Research as Science? A Critical Question. In: Reid, A., Hart, E., Peters, M. (eds) A Companion to Research in Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics