Abstract
D.C. Phillips argues for a platinum standard for educational research and though it is a step in the right the right direction, the disparate voices in educational research make it difficult to see its implementation. Moreover, what might sink the adoption of such a standard is the Deweyan pragmatism that Phillips espouses, since it seems to lead to relativism and a denial that disparate methods might provide different perspectives on the one truth. The view that scientific or quantitative research methods are somehow more objective depends very largely on what is meant by the term “objective”. The statistical methods which are seen as providing an objective assessment of an educational problem are not devoid of subjective choices and in many cases are a blunt instrument. Qualitative methods have their place, and educational researchers need to find ways in which practitioners using different research methodologies can work collaboratively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biesta G (2007) Why ‘what works’ won’t work: evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educ Theor 57(4):1–22
Carr D (2007) Moralized psychology or psychologized morality? Ethics and psychology in recent theorizing about moral and character education. Educ Theor 57(4):389–402
Feuer MJ, Towne L, Shavelson RJ (2002) Scientific culture and educational research. Educ Res 31(8):4–14
Koro-Ljungberg M, Yendol-Hoppey D, Jude Smith J, Hayes SB (2009) (E)pistemological awareness, instantiation of methods, and uninformed methodological ambiguity in qualitative research projects. Educ Res 38(9):687–699
Lingard B, Gale T (2010) Defining educational research: a perspective of/on presidential addresses and the Australian Association for Research in Education. Aust Educ Res 37(1):21–49
Moss PA (2005) Understanding the other/understanding ourselves: toward a constructive dialogue about “principles” in educational research. Educ Theor 55(3):263–283
Randall L (2005) The world’s biggest ideas: theory of everything. New Sci 187(2517):34–35
St. Pierre EA (2002) Comment: ‘science’ rejects postmodernism. Educ Res 31(8):25–27
Wright J (2008) Reframing quality and impact: the place of theory in education research. Aust Educ Res 35(1):1–16
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ozoliņš, J. (2014). Perplexing Times in Educational Research and the Prospects for a New Platinum Standard. In: Reid, A., Hart, E., Peters, M. (eds) A Companion to Research in Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6808-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6809-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)