Skip to main content

Language Use and Social Interaction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Social Psychology

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Language is a primary medium of social behavior and, as such, deserves center stage in the panoply of social psychological topics. This chapter explores the social psychology of language by reviewing scholarship that highlights how people use language to perform social actions. This approach goes against a tradition that sees spoken language primarily in terms of the conduit metaphor or only as a vehicle for communication. The authors review speech act theory (in philosophy) and pose the “mapping problem” (Levinson, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983) or how actions are linked to particular utterances. They then review different perspectives including sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, Goffmanian sociology, discursive psychology, and ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Discussion includes, for each of these perspectives, methodological procedures, including approaches to the relation between talk and social structure. Ever more realms of language use related to social psychology are coming under the microscope and set an agenda for further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A formerly influential variant of the communicational view of language is the famous Sapir-Whorf, or linguistic relativity, hypothesis. Benjamin Whorf, a student of the anthropologist Edward Sapir, studied the languages of American Indians and other groups, and argued that these languages conditioned the members’ life experiences. The Whorfian hypothesis suggests an iconic relation between language and thought—i.e., that language determines thought. Early on, Lennenberg (1953) and Brown (1958) pointed out the logical flaws in this proposition. For a more recent critique, see Pinker (1994: Chapter 3).

  2. 2.

    The source here is a transcript entitled “Virginia,” and the utterance is on page 27 at lines 27–28.

  3. 3.

    For a critical view of sociolinguistics from a sociological perspective, see Williams (1992).

  4. 4.

    Grimshaw (1974, p. 80) reviews the early literature comprehensively and suggests that sociolinguistics is a “hybrid discipline” that is “largely atheoretical.”

  5. 5.

    For a recent conversation analytic approach to emotion and emotion display in talk, see Peräkylä and Sorjonen (2012).

  6. 6.

    On conversation analysis and ethnography, also see Moerman (1988) and Maynard (2003: Chapter 3), among others.

  7. 7.

    A number of other researchers have begun to combine conversation analysis with statistical methods. See, for example, Heritage, Robinson, Elliott, Beckett, and Wilkes (2007), Maynard, Freese, and Schaeffer (2010), and Gibson (2010).

References

  • Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1992). Topic transitions in physician-patient interviews: Power, gender, and discourse change. Language in Society, 21, 409–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2012). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In J. Sidnell &T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. (1983). Political anatomy of the body. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer, P. (Ed.). (1999). Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1961). Philosophical papers. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baugh, J. (1999). Out of the mouths of slaves. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Engelmann, S. (1966). Teaching disadvantaged children in the preschool. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., Engelman, S., Osborn, J., & Reidford, P. A. (1966). An academically oriented pre-school for culturally deprived children. In F. M. Hechinger (Ed.), Pre-school education today: New approaches to teaching three-, four-, and five-year olds (pp. 105–135). New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1961). Social structure, language and learning. Educational Research, 3, 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1972). A sociolinguistic approach to socialization: With some reference to educability. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 465–511). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitborde, L. B. (1983). Levels of analysis in sociolinguistic explanation: Bilingual code switching, social relations, and domain theory. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 39, 5–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttny, R. (1993). Social accountability in communication. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttny, R. (1997). Reported speech in talking race on campus. Human Communication Research, 23(4), 477–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, G. (1987). Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 160–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J. K. (2008). Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A. V. (1981). Notes on the integration of micro- and macro-levels of analysis. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1985). Language use and language users. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 179–231). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayman, S. E. (1988). Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems, 35(4), 474–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayman, S. E., & Gill, V. T. (2012). Conversation analysis. In A. Bryman & M. Hardy (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 119–134). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. A. (1979). Young children’s conception of status and role. Sociology of Education, 55, 160–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. A. (1992). Interpretive reproduction in children’s peer cultures. Social Psychological Quarterly, 55, 160–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. A. (1996). Transitions in early childhood: The promise of comparative, longitudinal ethnography. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 419–456). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, M. (1977). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danet, B. (1980). Language in the legal process. Law and Society Review, 14, 445–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Saussure, F. (2011[1916]). Course in general linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duneier, M., & Molotch, H. (1999). Talking city trouble: Interactional vandalism, social inequality, and the ‘urban interaction problem’. The American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1263–1295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, D. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1995). Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(4), 319–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (1979). Language and disadvantage. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Maynard, D. W. (2011). Pragmatism and ethnomethodology. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 221–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1972). On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, J. R. (1935). The techniques of semantics. Transactions of the Philological Society, 7, 36–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. (1983). Doctor talk/patient talk: How treatment decisions are negotiated in doctor-patient communication. In S. Fisher & A. D. Todd (Eds.), The social organization of doctor-patient communication (pp. 135–157). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. (2008). Women speaking up: Getting and using turns in workplace meetings. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, C. B. (1989). Analyzing gender in public places: Rethinking Goffman’s vision of everyday life. The American Sociologist, 20(1), 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, C. B. (1995). Passing by: Gender and public harassment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. D. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2010). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. (2010). Marking the turn: Obligation, engagement, and alienation in group discussions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 132–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, H., & Robinson, W. P. (1990). Prologue. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 1–8). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, V. T. (1998). Doing attributions in medical interaction: Patients’ explanations for illness and doctors’ responses. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 342–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, V. T., & Roberts, F. (2012). Conversation analysis in medicine. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 575–592). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (Ed.). (2003). Conversation and brain damage. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2007a). Participation, stance, and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18(1), 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive-response sequences. Talk and Text, 26(4/5), 513–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. H. (2007b). Participation and embodied action in preadolescent girls’ assessment activity. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 67, 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & N. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Speech acts, Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, A. (1989). Collegial discourse: Professional conversation among peers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, A. D. (1974). Sociolinguistics. In I. d. S. Pool & W. Schramm (Eds.), Handbook of communication (pp. 49–92). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Introduction. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 1–25). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. J., & Hymes, D. (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1986). An outline of the social constructionist viewpoint. In R. Harré (Ed.), The social construction of emotions (pp. 2–14). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J. (Eds.). (2013). Conversational repair and human understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. (1989). Pain talk: The expression of suffering in the medical consultation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(2), 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Designing the recipient: Managing advice resistance in institutional settings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74, 216–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (2012b). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 30–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. E. (2010). Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. (Eds.). (2006). Communication in medical care: Interactions between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J., Robinson, J., Elliott, M., Beckett, M., & Wilkes, M. (2007). Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(10), 1429–1433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzler, J. O. (1965). A sociology of language. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. P., & Shulman, D. (2011). Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtgraves, T. (1991). Interpreting questions and replies: Effects of face-threat, question form, and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40, 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. (1953). Persuasion and communication. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1983). Issues in the transcription of naturally occurring talk: Caricature versus capturing pronunciational particulars. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, 34, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, M. R. (1972). Linguistic behavior of male and female. Linguistics, 88, 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C. (2005). Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing the heterosexual nuclear family in after-hours medical calls. Social Problems, 52(4), 477–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C. (2008). Conversation analysis: Technical matters for gender research. In K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Saunston, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender and language research methodologies (pp. 119–138). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C. (2012). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 229–256). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollock, P., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1985). Sex and power in interaction: Conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, 50, 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972a). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972b). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, V., & Kitzinger, C. (2011). Categories in talk-in-interaction: Gendering speaker and recipient. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennenberg, E. H. (1953). Cognition and ethnolinguistics. Language, 29, 463–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. (1989). Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. H. (1996). Finding ‘face’ in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 303–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutfey, K., & Maynard, D. W. (1998). Bad news in oncology: How physician and patient talk about death and dying without using those words. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive societies. In C. K. Ogden & J. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 451–510). London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P., & Ray, G. (1993). Shyness, self-confidence, and social interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 178–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzo, J. (1996). Taking turns and taking sides: Opening scenes from two jury deliverations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlaire, C. L., & Maynard, D. W. (1990). Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon. Sociology of Education, 63, 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W. (1984). Inside plea bargaining: The language of negotiation. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W. (1987). Language and social interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), v–vi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W. (2005). Social actions, gestalt coherence, and designations of disability: Lessons from and about autism. Social Problems, 52, 499–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W., & Clayman, S. E. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W., Freese, J., & Schaeffer, N. C. (2010). Calling for participation: Requests, blocking moves, and rational (inter)action. American Sociological Review, 75(5), 791–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Schaeffer, N. C., & Zouwen, H. v. d. (Eds.). (2002). Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview. New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W., & Marlaire, C. L. (1992). Good reasons for bad testing performance: The interactional substrate of educational testing. Qualitative Sociology, 15, 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. P., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24, 245–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1991). The school’s work of sorting students. In D. B. a. D. H. Zimmerman (Ed.), Talk and social structure (pp. 71–90). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, M. (1988). Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, H. L., & Boden, D. (1985). Talking social structure: Discourse, domination and the Watergate hearings. American Sociological Review, 50, 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2012). Garden lessons: Embodied action and joint attention in extended sequences. In H. Nasu & F. C. Waksler (Eds.), Interaction and everyday life: Phenomenological and ethnomethodological essays in honor of George Psathas. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, D. G., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). Changing the subject: Gender, status, and the dynamics of topic change. American Sociological Review, 66, 852–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peräkylä, A. (1995). Aids counselling: Institutional interaction and clinical practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peräkylä, A. (1998). Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 301–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peräkylä, A. (Ed.). (2008). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peräkylä, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (Eds.). (2012). Emotion in interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. (1982). The invisible culture: Communication in classroom and community on the Warm Springs Indian reservation. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. F. (1972). Wittgenstein and justice: On the significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for social and political thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social construction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (2012). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA Handbook of research methods in psychology (Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, Vol. 2). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2011). Recipients designed: Tag-questions and gender. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender (pp. 135–152). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, A. W. (1987). The interaction order sui generis: Goffman’s contribution to social theory. Sociological Theory, 5, 136–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, A. W. (2010). Social order as moral order. In S. Hitlin & S. Vaisey (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality (pp. 95–122). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruusuvuori, J. (2012). Emotion, affect and conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 330–349). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 21–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Fall 1964-spring 1968, Vol. 1). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1989). Reflections on language, development and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In M. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 139–153). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 44–70). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided for place for the defence of intersubjectivity in conversation. The American Journal of Sociology, 95(5), 1295–1345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 59–82). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1987). Communication and medical practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorjonen, M.-L. (2001). Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. A. (2011). On the role of reported, third party compliments in passing as a ‘real woman’. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender (pp. 155–182). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. A. (2012). The interactional organization of self-praise: Epistemics, preference organization, and implications for identity research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75, 52–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. A., & Parsons, C. (2006). Gatekeeping gender: Some features of the use of hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients. Discourse and Society, 17(6), 785–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. A., & Stokoe, E. (2011a). An introduction to conversation and gender. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. A., & Stokoe, E. (Eds.). (2011b). Conversation and gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stivers, T. (2007). Prescribing under pressure: Parent-physician conversations and antibiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stivers, T., & Majid, A. (2007). Questioning children: Interactional evidence of implicit bias in medical interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 424–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (Eds.). (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, E. (2008). Categories and sequences: Formulating gender in talk-in-interaction. In K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Saunston, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender and language research methodologies (pp. 139–157). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, E. (2010). ‘I’m not gonna hit a lady’: Conversation analysis, membership categorization, and men’s denials of violence toward women. Discourse and Society, 21(1), 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, E. (2011). ‘Girl–woman–sorry!’: On the repair and non-repair of consecutive gender categories. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2007). ‘Black this, black that’: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations. Discourse and Society, 18(3), 337–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. Philosophical Review, 73, 439–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, P. (1979). The ceremonial order of the clinic. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B., & Henley, N. (1975). Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., & Stets, J. E. (2006). Sociological theories of human emotions. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turowetz, J. J., & Maynard, D. W. (2010). Morality in the social interactional and discursive world of everyday life. In S. Hitlin & S. Vaisey (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (Ed.). (1985). Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 1–4). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (1997a). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (1997b). The study of discourse. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (pp. 1–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waitzkin, H. (1991). The politics of medical encounters: How patients and doctors deal with social problems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Garcia, A. (1988). Conversational shift work. Social Problems, 35, 550–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations with unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 102–117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1985). Gender, language and discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 4, pp. 103–124). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, J., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Observations on the display and management of emotion in naturally occurring activities: The case of ‘hysteria’ in calls to 9-1-1. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, M., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 172–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, K. (2009). Categorizing the categorizer: The management of racial common sense in interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(4), 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, K., & Lerner, G. (2009). When are persons ‘white’? On some practical asymmetries of racial reference in talk-in-interaction. Discourse and Society, 20(5), 613–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieder, D. L. (1974). Language and social reality. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 150–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (1992). Sociolinguistics: A sociological critique. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H. (1970). The practicalities of rule use. In J. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life (pp. 221–238). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H., & Boden, D. (1991). Structure-in-action: An introduction. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas W. Maynard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maynard, D.W., Turowetz, J. (2013). Language Use and Social Interaction. In: DeLamater, J., Ward, A. (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics