Advertisement

How Nationalism is Similar to Juvenile Delinquency

  • Jerome BraunEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The psychology of nationalism is discussed, compared to authoritarian and narcissistic forms of personal identity, and shown to have similarities with authoritarian and narcissistic sources of juvenile delinquency. A typology of close personal relationships is developed which is used to discuss the differences between gemeinschaft (community) and gesellschaft (association), as well as the existence of mixed cases. There is reference to cultural values that influence the development of juvenile delinquency in Germany, South Africa, and America, and how this parallels differences in social solidarities that have influence on politics. The cultural requirements for American-style democracy, based on both moralistic ideals and lack of strong social solidarity, producing a particular version of gesellschaft, are compared to the cultural requirements of more authoritarian, often originally gemeinschaft-based societies, where over time the reasons for the rules are sometimes lost and replaced by clinging for reasons of sought emotional security.

Keywords

Authoritarianism Gemeinschaft (community) Gesellschaft (association) Juvenile delinquency Narcissism Nationalism 

References

  1. Ascher, W., & Hirschfelder-Ascher, B. (2003). Revitalizing political psychology: The legacy of Harold D. Lasswell. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Braun, J. (Ed.). (1995). Social pathology in comparative perspective: The nature and psychology of civil society. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  4. Crone, P. (2003). Pre-industrial societies: Anatomy of the pre-modern world. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
  5. Duckitt, J. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foer, F. (2004). How soccer explains the world. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, S. (1949). Instincts and their vicissitudes. In E. Jones (Ed.), Collected papers of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 109–140). London: Hogarth Press. Translation under the supervision of Joan Riviere.Google Scholar
  8. Freud, S. (1961). Civilization and its discontents, trans. J.B. Strachey. New York: W.W Norton. Google Scholar
  9. Gellner, Ernest. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gellner, E. (1996). Conditions of liberty: Civil society and its rivals. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Goodson, R. (Ed.). (2003). Menace to society: Political-criminal collaboration around the world. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Greenfield, L. (2003). Nationalism: Five roads to modernity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Greenstein, F. (1965). Personality and political socialization: The theories of authoritarian and democratic character. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 361, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoover, K. (Ed.). (2004). The future of identity: Centennial reflections on the legacy of Erik Erikson. Maryland: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  15. Kornai, J., & Rose-Ackerman, S. (Eds.). (2004). Building a trustworthy state in post-socialist transition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Lasch, C. (1991). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  17. Lewin, K. (1936). Some social psychological differences between the United States and Germany. Character and Personality, 36, 265–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis, C. S. (1960). The four loves. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  19. Lipset, S. M. (1997). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  20. Lipset, S. M. (2003). The first new nation: The United States in historical and comparative perspective. New Jersey: Transaction publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Mann, M. (2005). The dark side of democracy: Explaining ethnic cleansing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Misztal, B. (1996). Trust in modern societies: The search for the bases of social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Reicher, S. D., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Self and nation. Categorization, contestation and globalisation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rupnik, J. (2007). Popular front: Eastern Europe’s turn right. The New Republic, 236, 12–14.Google Scholar
  26. Sanford, N. (1973). The authoritarian personality in contemporary perspective. In J. Knutson (Ed.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 139–170). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Seligman, A. B. (2000). The problem of trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Shapiro, D. (2000). Dynamics of character: Self-regulation in psychopathology. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  29. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, A. D. (1993). National identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
  31. Stone, W. F., Lederer, G., & Christie, R. (Eds.). (1993). Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  33. Volkan, V. (1988). The need to have enemies and allies: From clinical practice to international relationships. New Jersey: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  34. Weintraub, J., & Kumar, K. (Eds.). (1997). Public and private in thought and practice: Perspectives on a grand dichotomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Drew, W. (1985). Self and society: Narcissism, collectivism, and the development of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wiarda, H. J. (2006). Comparative politics: Approaches and issues. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  37. Wilkinson, R. (1972). The broken rebel: A study in culture, politics, and authoritarian culture. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations