Making a Case for Early Intervention: The Role of Developmental Neuroscience

Chapter
Part of the Educating the Young Child book series (EDYC, volume 7)

Abstract

Early intervention refers to a wide range of programmes designed to augment the development of children from at-risk populations or with developmental disabilities. However this term incorporates a diverse range of government and local intervention programmes, and their efficacy and appropriate resourcing are much-debated issues within the literature and in public and policy discourses. This chapter will consider the implications of findings from the field of developmental neuroscience for evaluating and enhancing these programmes. It will discuss how advances in our understanding of neurobiological issues, such as neural plasticity, synaptic pruning and sensitive periods, might inform policy and practice in this area.

Keywords

Autistic Spectrum Disorder Early Intervention Head Start Enrich Environment Parental Leave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, G., & Duncan-Smith, I. (2008). Early intervention: Good parents, great kids, better citizens. London: The Centre for Social Justice.Google Scholar
  2. Barazzoni, R. (2005). Brick by brick: The history of the “XXV Aprile” People’s nursery school of Villa Cella. Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, B. (1964). Stability and change in human characteristics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1967, October 7). The split-level American family. Saturday Review, 60–66. (Reprinted in Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development, by U. Bronfenbrenner, Ed., 2005, London, UK: Sage)Google Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1970). Minority report of Forum 15. In White House Conference on Children, Report to the President: Child Development Recommendations. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Reprinted 2005 in U. Bronfenbrenner (Ed.), Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Chazon-Cohen, R., Halle, T. G., & Barton, G. R. (2012). Supporting optimal child development through Early Head Start and Head Start programmes: Reflections on secondary data analysis of FACES and EHSREP. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(4), 571.Google Scholar
  7. Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. J. (2007). The technology of skill formation. American Economic Review, 97(2), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dobbie, W., Fryer, R. G., & Fryer, G., Jr. (2011). Are high quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s Zone. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3), 158–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodd-Nufrio, A. T. (2011). Reggio Emilia, Maria Montessori and John Dewey: Dispelling teachers’ misconceptions and understanding theoretical foundations. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39, 235–237. doi: 10.1007/s10643-011-0451-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunst, C. J. (2007). Early intervention for infants and toddlers with developmental disabilities. In S. L. Odom, R. H. Horner, M. E. Snell, & J. Blacher (Eds.), Handbook of developmental disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (2012). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission: Early Childhood Education and Care: Providing all our children with the best start for the world of tomorrow [COM (2011) 66]. http://ec.europa.eu/education/schooleducation/doc/childhoodcom_en.pdf
  13. Gentleman, A. (2011, January 19). Making the case for early intervention: Interview with Graham Allen, author of the government-commissioned early intervention report and Labour MP. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk
  14. Heckman, J. J. (2007). The technology and neuroscience of capacity formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(3), 13250–13255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2004). The productivity argument for investing in young children (Working paper 5). Invest in Kids Working Group, Committee for Economic Development. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Howard-Jones, P. (2007). Neuroscience and education: Issues and opportunities. A commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme. London, UK: TLRP/ESRC, University of London.Google Scholar
  17. Howard-Jones, P. (2010). Philosophical challenges for researchers at the interface between neuroscience and education. Philosophy of Education, 42, 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunt, J. M. (1961). Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, M. H., & de Haan, M. (2011). Developmental cognitive neuroscience (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Lake, A. (2011). Early childhood development – Global action is overdue. The Lancet, 378(9799), 1277–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lerner, R. M. (2005). Foreword. In U. Bronfenbrenner (Ed.), Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis, M. (1998). Altering fate: Why the past does not predict the future. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2010). The Foundations of Lifelong Health Are Built in Early Childhood. Retrieved from www.developingchild.harvard.edu
  24. OECD. (2009). Education at a glance 2009: OECD indicators. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  25. Penn, H. (2010). Shaping the future: How human capital arguments about investment in early childhood are being (mis)used in poor countries. In N. Yelland (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives in early childhood education. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Prince, M., Bryce, R., & Ferri, C. (2011). The world Alzheimer report 2011: The benefits of early diagnosis and intervention. New York/London: Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI).Google Scholar
  27. Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Renner, M. J., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1987). Enriched and impoverished environments: Effects on brain and behavior. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Richards, R., Merrill, R. M., Baksh, L., & McGarry, J. (2011). Maternal health behaviours and infant health outcomes among homeless mothers: US special supplemental nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) 2000–2007. Preventive Medicine, 52(1), 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Rogers, S. J., & Dawson, G. (2010). Early start Denver model for young children with autism: Promoting language, learning and engagement. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sandman, C. A., Davis, E. P., Buss, C., & Glynn, L. M. (2011). Prenatal programming of human neurological function. International Journal of Peptides. doi: 10.1155/2011/837596.Google Scholar
  33. UNICEF. (2008). The child care transition, Innocenti Report Card 8. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  34. UNICEF. (2010). The children left behind: A league table of inequality in child wellbeing in the world’s rich countries, Innocenti Report Card 9. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  35. UN Secretary-General. (2011). Promotion and protection of the rights of children: Follow up to the outcome of the special session on children. A/66/258. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  36. US Department of Health and Social Services. (2012). http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2012/assets/health.pdf
  37. WAVE Trust. (2010). International experience of early intervention for children, young people and their families. Croydon, UK: WAVE Trust.Google Scholar
  38. Wiesel, T. N., & Hubel, D. H. (1965). Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28, 1060–1072.Google Scholar
  39. Zigler, E., & Styfco, S. J. (2010). The hidden history of Head Start. Oxford Scholarship Online. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393767.001.0001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations