Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Crop Choices with Limiting Water Supplies: Deficit Irrigation and Sensitive Crop Growth Stages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Drought in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions

  • 2337 Accesses

Abstract

Limited supplies of good-quality water in semi-arid and arid crop production regions often results in intense competition for water supplies among agricultural, municipal, and environmental interests. This increased competition can provide motivation for agricultural water users to reduce planted acreage, change practices or use equipment to control water losses, improve efficiencies of water application or irrigation scheduling, and consider changes in water management to impose some periods of deficit irrigation. Each of these choices has consequences for the crop, land and producer, the magnitude of which often depends on the knowledge of the agent making the choice as well as other factors outside of their control. For instance, if deficit irrigation is to be effective, it requires identification of growth stages sensitive to reduced water applications. Additionally, deficit irrigation requires development of new irrigation scheduling approaches that are based on a reduction of applications, at least during a large portion of the less-sensitive crop-growth stages. Crop species have different sensitivities to water deficit and, therefore, the potential impact on crop productivity (yield) will likewise be different. Crop-quality characteristics can also be adversely affected, some of which can impact marketability and the relative value of the crop. Objectives of this analysis are to describe crop and water management issues that can arise when deficit irrigation is considered as a water-saving approach. This chapter also provides examples of crop species characteristics that impact the suitability of deficit irrigation as a workable management option when irrigation water is scarce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beede RH, Goldhamer DA (2005) Olive irrigation management. In: Sibbett GS, Ferguson L (eds) Olive production manual, 2 edn. University of California Publication No. 3353. pp 61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai SP, McHugh AD, Lotz G, Midmore DJ (2006) The response of cotton to subsurface drip and furrow irrigation in a Vertisol. Exp Agric 42:26–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourland FM (1989) Trends in available cotton cultivars. Agricultural experiment station report. Div Agric Univ Arkansas 138:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray EA, Bailey-Serres U, Weretilnyk E (2002) Responses to abiotic stresses. In: Buchanan B, Gruissem W, Jones R (eds) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. Wiley Interscience Publications, New York, pp 1158–1249

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchner RP, Fulton AE, Giles CK, Pritchard TL, Lampinen BD, Shackel KA, METcalf SG,. Little CC, Schwankl LJ (2008) Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on walnut grafted on “Northern California Black” or “Paradox” rootstock. In: Goodwin I, O’Connell MG (eds) Proceedings fifth international symposium on irrigation of horticultural crops. June 2008. Acta Horticulturae. Number vol 792, pp 141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves MM, Oliveira MM (2004) Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water saving agriculture. J Exp Bot 55:2365–2384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook CG, El Zik KM (1993) Fruiting and lint yield of cotton cultivars under irrigated and nonirrigated conditions. Field Crops Res 33:411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Water Resources (2008) Annual land and water use data. Available from: http://www.landwateruse.water.ca.gov/annualdata. California Department of Water Resources (DWR)

  • California Department of Water Resources (2005) The California water plan update. Public Review Draft (May, 2005). Bulletin 160-05. California Department of Water Resources (DWR), Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Water Resources (1983) The California Water Plan Update. Bulletin 160–183. California Department Water Resources (DWR), Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • English M (1990) Deficit irrigation. I. Analytical framework. J Irrig Drainage Eng 116:399–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereres E, Soriano MA (2007) Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J Exp Bot 58(2):147–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler JL (1986) Salinity and fruiting. In: Mauney JR, McD. Stewart J (eds) Cotton physiology. The cotton foundation, Memphis, TN. pp 107–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer DA, Beede R, Sibbett S, DeJong TM, Ramos D, Phene RC, Doyle J (1988) Third-year effects of deficit irrigation on walnut tree performance. Report to the California Walnut Board. pp 91–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer DA, Beede R, Sibbett S, Ramos D, Katayama D (1990) Second-year recovery of hedgerow walnuts from sustained deficit irrigation. Report to the California Walnut Board. pp 73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer DA, Beede BH (2004) Regulated deficit irrigation effects on yield, nut quality and water use efficiency of mature pistachio trees. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 79(4):538–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer DA (2005) Irrigation management. In: Ferguson L (ed) University of California Pistachio Production Manual. pp 103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer DA, Viveros M, Salinas M (2006) Regulated deficit irrigation in almonds: effects of variations in applied water and stress timing on yield and yield components. Irrig Sci 24:101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grattan SR, Berenguer MJ, Connell JH, Polito VS, Vossen PM (2006) Olive oil production as influenced by different quantities of applied water. Agric Water Manag 85(1–2):133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes DW, Yamada YH (1982) Relation of cotton growth and yield to minimum leaf water potential. Crop Sci 22:134–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grismer ME (2001) Regional alfalfa yields and water value in western states. J Irrig Drainage Eng 127:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hake SJ, Kerby TA, Hake KD (1996) Cotton production manual. Public. # 3352. University of California, Agriculture and natural resources, p 422

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson BR, Bali KM, Sanden BL (2008a) Irrigating alfalfa in arid regions, Chapter 7. In: Summers C, Putnam D (eds) Irrigated alfalfa management for Mediterranean and desert zones. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3512

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson B, Bali K, Orloff S, Sanden B, Putnam D (2008b) How much water does alfalfa really need? In: Proceedings, 2008 California Alfalfa and forage symposium and western seed conference, San Diego, CA. UC Cooperative Extension, Plant Sciences Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu, 2–4 Dec 2008

  • Hanson B, Hopmans JW, Simunek J (2008c) Leaching with subsurface drip irrigation under saline, shallow groundwater conditions. Vadose Zone J 7:810–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson B (2008) Drip irrigation of processing tomatoes. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Public. No. 3506. University of California, Oakland, p 58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson B, May D (2004) Effect of subsurface drip irrigation on processing tomato yield, water table depth, soil salinity and profitability. Agric Water Manag 68(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell TA, Hatfield JL, Rhoades JD, Meron M (1984) Response of cotton water stress indicators to soil salinity. Irrig Sci 5(1):25–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutmacher RB, Phene CJ, Davis KR, Vail SS, Kerby TA, Peters M, Hawk CA, Keeley M, Clark DA, Ballard D, Hudson N (1995) Evapotranspiration, fertility management for subsurface drip Acala and Pima cotton. In: Lamm FR (ed) Proceedings 5 international Microirrigation congress, ASAE, St. Joseph, Mich, pp 147–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutmacher RB, Davis KR, Vail S, Peters MS, Nevarez A, Covarrubias J (1998) Root distribution of cotton: effects of water application amounts under subsurface drip irrigation. In: Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conference, Nat. Cotton Council, Memphis, Tenn, pp 1491–1495

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RS, Phene BC (2008) Fruit quality disorders in an early maturing peach cultivar caused by postharvest water stress. Proceedings Vth IS on irrigation horticultural Crops, Acta Hort. 792, international society horticultural science

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RS, Handley DF, DeJong TM (1992) Long-term response of early maturing peach trees to postharvest water deficits. J Am Soc Hort Sci 117(6):881–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones HG (2004) Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. J Exp Bot 55:2427–2436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan WR, Miller FR (1980) Genetic variability in sorghum root systems: Implications for drought tolerance. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptation of plants to water and high-temperature stress. Wiley Interscience Publications, New York, pp 383–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang S, Zhang J (2004) Controlled alternate partial root zone irrigation: its physiological consequences and impact on water use efficiency. J Exp Bot 55(407):2437–2446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirda C, Moutonnet P, Hera C, Nielsen DR (eds) (1999) Crop yield response to deficit irrigation. Kluwer Academic Publication, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen B, Grant J, METcalf S, Negra C (2008) Walnut production and quality as influenced by orchard and within tree canopy environment. Walnut Research Reports 2007. p 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen B, Buchner R, Fulton A, Grant J, Mills N, Pritchard T, Schwankl L, Shackel K, Gilles C, Little C, METcalf S, Rivers D, Gamble V (2003) Irrigation management in walnut using evapotranspiration, soil and plant based data. Report to the California Walnut Board. p 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Feng G (2007) Dynamic versus steady-state approaches to evaluate irrigation management for saline waters. Agric Water Manag 91:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas EV, Hoffman G (1977) Crop salt tolerance: current assessment. J Irrig Drainage Eng Div ASCE. 103(129993):115–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Munk DS, Grimes DW, Kerby TA (1994) Plant responses to late season water deficits in Acala cotton cultivars. In: Constable IGA, Forrester NW (eds) Challenging the future. Proceedings world cotton conference, pp 103–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Namken LN, Heilman MD (1973) Determinate cotton cultivars for more efficient cotton production in the lower Rio Grande Valley. Agronomy J 65:953–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prichard TL, Battany M, Smith R, Schwankl L (2010) Winegrapes: irrigation management of winegrapes with a limited water supply. In: Schwankl L, Prichard T (eds) UC drought management. University of California agriculture and natural resources website: http://ucmanagedrought.ucdavis.edu/wineGrapes.cfm, p 6

  • Prichard TL, Verdegaal PS, Ingels CA (2009) Deficit irrigation management strategies and the influence of extended maturation on vine health, fruit yield and quality: Syrah in Region III–IV. Report to California Department of Water Resources

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades JD (1983) Reusing saline drainage waters for irrigation: a strategy to reduce salt loading of rivers. In: French RH (ed) Salinity in watercourses and reservoirs. Butterworth Publications, Stoneham, MA. pp 455–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger A, Silvertooth JC, Brown PW (1998) Upland cotton growth and yield response timing the initial post-plant irrigation. Agron J 90:455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor HM (1980) Modifying root systems of cotton and soybean to increase water absorption. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. Wiley Interscience Publications, New York. pp 75–84

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2003) Farm and ranch irrigation survey. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Plant Sciences Department, University of California, Davis, and West Side Research and Extension Center, P.O. Box 158, Five Points, CA, 93624, USA

    Robert B. Hutmacher

Authors
  1. Robert B. Hutmacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert B. Hutmacher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, University Avenue 900, Riverside, 92521, California, USA

    Kurt Schwabe

  2. CITA-DGA, Department of Agricultural Economics, Agrifood Research and Technology Centre, Avenida Montañana 930, Zaragoza, 50059, Spain

    Jose Albiac

  3. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems – Urrbrae, Waite Road, Glen Osmond, 5064, South Australia, Australia

    Jeffery D. Connor

  4. Centre for Environmental Economics and P, Agricultural Economics, University of Pretoria, Lynnwood Road, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa

    Rashid M. Hassan

  5. , Department of Economics, Ibero-American University, Prolongacion Paseo de la Reforma 880, Mexico City, 01219, Distrito Federal, Mexico

    Liliana Meza González

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hutmacher, R.B. (2013). Crop Choices with Limiting Water Supplies: Deficit Irrigation and Sensitive Crop Growth Stages. In: Schwabe, K., Albiac, J., Connor, J., Hassan, R., Meza González, L. (eds) Drought in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6636-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation