Abstract
Global trade in bivalve molluscan species has been increasing at a significant rate and in 2010; global production of molluscs (excluding fresh water molluscs and cephalopods) reached 14.6 million tonnes, of which 12.9 million tonnes came from aquaculture. Total bivalve trade has expanded continuously during the past three decades to reach US$ 2.1 billion in 2009. Scallops are the most important species accounting for 46 % of trade by value, followed closely by mussels (26 %). In terms of quantity, scallops accounted for 24 % of export, while mussels contributed to 48 %. FAO/WHO has been providing scientific support for Codex Committees working in bivalve molluscs and the ongoing work relates to Vibrio parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus in oysters, norovirus, hepatitis A virus and biotoxins in bivalves. Considering that a risk management tool that is applicable over wide geographical areas would be very useful for pathogenic Vibrio spp., a tool based on FAO/WHO risk assessment for V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus is being examined. Though shellfish harvesting is generally controlled using faecal indicator bacteria, there are concerns about the adequacy of this measure with respect of some pathogens such as viruses. There are also a number of concerns about the sampling plans required for detection of pathogens when the prevalence is very low and about the lack of internationally validated methods for some pathogens like V. parahaemolyticus and viruses. FAO/WHO initiatives to address these concerns and efforts made to build capacity in these areas and improve market access for bivalves from these countries is discussed in this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
CSPI (2012) www.Cspinet.org/new/201303251.html
Deepanjali A, Sanath Kumar H, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I (2005) Seasonal variation in abundance of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus bacteria in oysters along the Southwest coast of India. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3575–3580
DePaola A, Jones JL, Woods J, Burkhardt W, Calci KR, Krantz JA, Bowers JC, Kasturi K, Byars RH, Jacobs E, Williams-Hill D, Nabe K (2010) Bacterial and viral pathogens in live oysters: 2007 United States market survey. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:2754–2768
DeWaal CS, Roberts C, Catella C (2012) Outbreak Alert, 1999–2008. Center for Science in the Public Interest. http://www.cspinet.org/foodsafety/PDFs/Outbreak_Alert_1999-2008.pdf
EFSA (2009) The Community summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses and zoonotic agents in the European Union in 2007. The EFSA Journal (2009), 223
EFSA (2010) The Community summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses and zoonotic agents and foodborne outbreaks in the European Union in 2008. EFSA J 8(1):2496
EFSA (2011) The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses and zoonotic agents and foodborne outbreaks in 2009. EFSA J 9(3):2090
Eyles M, Davey G, Arnold G (1985) Behaviour and incidence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Sydney rock oysters (Crassostrea commercialis). Int J Food Microbiol 1:327–334
FAO (2010) The state of the world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO, Rome, 197 pp
FAO/WHO (2011a) Risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood, Microbiological risk assessment series 16. FAO/WHO, Rome, 183 pp
FAO/WHO (2011b) Interim report of the electronic expert group on Salmonella in bivalve molluscs. ftp://ftp.fao.org/ag/agn/jmra/CRD_12_Interim_report.pdf
FAO (2012a) FAO fisheries and aquaculture information and statistics service. FAO, Rome
FAO/WHO (2012b) Risk assessment tools for Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus associated with seafood. Microbiological risk assessment series 20 (in press)
Girard S, Mariojouls C (2000) Analysis of the French demand for oysters and mussels, within the European market. http://oregonstate.edu/dept/iifet/2000/papers/girard.pdf
Hall G, Raupach J, Yohannes K (2006) An estimate of under-reporting in foodborne notifiable diseases: Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shiga Toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC). NCEPH working paper 52. http://nceph.anu.edu.au/Publications/Working_Papers/WP52.pdf
Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson M, Roy SL, Jones JJ, Griffin PM (2011) Foodborne illness acquired in the United States – major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 17:16–22
Wheeler JG, Sethi D, Cowden JM, Wall PJ, Rodrgues LC, Tompkins DS, Hudson MJ, Roderick PJ (1999) Study of intestinal infectious disease in England: rates in the community, presenting to general practice and reported to national surveillance. BMJ 318:1046–1050
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Stefania Vannuccini, Zhou Xiaowai and Luca Garibaldi from Fisheries Statistics and Information Service for providing the data on bivalve production and trade.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karunasagar, I. (2014). Recent International Efforts to Improve Bivalve Molluscan Shellfish Safety. In: Sauvé, G. (eds) Molluscan Shellfish Safety. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6588-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6588-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6587-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6588-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)