Abstract
In this chapter, it is argued that children when playing in day care are also playing with social identities. This holds true whenever they play together with peers, both when engaged in symbolic group play and when playing games with rules. Through Schousboe’s comprehensive model of spheres of realities in playing (see Schousboe, The structure of fantasy play and its implications for good and evil games (Chapter 2). In Schousboe I, Winther-Lindqvist D (eds.) Children’s play and development: Cultural-historical perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht, 2013) and Lev Vygotsky’s insight that all playing involve rules as well as pretence, children’s playing is analysed as an activity involving the making, remaking and exploration of social identities among the children. The paper is informed by ethnographic observations in two different Danish day-care centres and draws on illustrative examples with symbolic group playing as well as game playing with rules (soccer) among 5-year-old boys. Findings suggest that day-care children’s playing and negotiation of roles, positions and rules are intrinsically concerned with processes of social identities, both those that are anchored in the social reality and those anticipated and imagined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almqvist, B. (1994). Educational toys; creative toys. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Toys, play and child development (pp. 46–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development and adaptation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Baldwin, J. M. (1908). Knowledge and imagination. Psychological Review, XV, 181–196. Press of the New Era Printing Company.
Bateson, G. (1976). A theory of play and fantasy. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylvia (Eds.), Play – Its role in development and evolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.
Bauer, M., & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 163–186. Publishers Ltd.
Bodrova, E. (2008). Make-believe play versus academic skills: A Vygotskian approach to today’s dilemma of early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 16(3), 357–369.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Bretherton, I. (1984). Representing the social world: Reality and fantasy. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play. Orlando: Academic.
Bretherton, I. (1989). Pretence: The form and function of make-believe play. Developmental Review, 9, 383–401.
Cohen, D. (1987). The development of play (Croom Helm series). Beckenham: Croom Helm Ltd.
Corsaro, W. (1994). Discussion, debate and friendship processes: Peer dispute in US and Italian nursery schools. Sociology of Education, 67, 1–26.
Corsaro, W. A., & Eder, D. (1990). Children’s peer cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 197–220.
Duncan, R. M., & Tarulli, D. (2003). Play as the leading activity of the preschool period: Insights from Vygotsky, Leon’ev, and Bakhtin. Early Education & Development, 14(3), 271–292.
Duveen, G. (2001). Representations, identities, resistance. In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social – Bridging theoretical traditions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Duveen, G., & Lloyd, B. (1993). An ethnographic approach to social representations. In G. M. Breakwell & D. V. Canter (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
El’Konin, D. (1988). Legens psykologi [Psychology of play]. Moscow: Forlaget Progress.
Engel, S. (2005a). The narrative worlds of what is and what if. Cognitive Development, 20, 514–525.
Engel, S. (2005b). Real kids – Creating meaning in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fein, G. G. (1981). Pretend play: An integrative review. Child Development, 52, 1095–1118.
Fine, G. A. (1983). Shared fantasy. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
Friedman, O., & Leslie, A. M. (2007). The conceptual underpinnings of pretence: Pretending is not ‘behaving-as-if’. Cognition, 105, 103–124.
Furth, H., & Kane, S. R. (1992). Children constructing society: A new perspective on children at play. In H. Mcgurk (Ed.), Childhood social development – Contemporary perspectives. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Garvey, C. (1977/1990). Play. London: Open Books.
Goffman, E. (1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
Goldman, L. R. (1998). Child’s play – Myth, mimesis and make-believe. Oxford/New York: Berg.
Golomb, C., & Kuersten, R. (1996). On the transition from pretence play to reality: What are the rules of the game? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 203–217.
Göncü, A. (1993). Intersubjectivity in the dyadic play of preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 99–116.
Goodwin, M. H. (2004). The relevance of ethnicity, class, and gender in children’s peer negotiations. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Groos, K. (1976/1901). The play of man: Teasing and love-play. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylvia (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.
Harré, R. (1977). Rules in the explanation of social behave. In P. Collett (Ed.), Social rules and social behaviour (pp. 28–41). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hedegaard, M. (2007). Institutional practices, cultural positions, and personal motives: Immigrant Turkish parents’ conceptions about their children’s school life. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice – Cultural historical approaches. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitets Forlag.
Hendy, L., & Toon, L. (2001). Supporting drama and imaginative play in the early years. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hofstadter, D. (1984). Gödel, Escher, Bach, an eternal golden braid. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Hughes, L. (1991). A conceptual framework for the study of children’s gaming. Play & Culture, 4, 284–301.
Hughes, L. (1995). Children’s games and gaming. In B. Sutton-Smith et al. (Eds.), Children’s folklore: A source book (pp. 93–119). New York/London: Garland.
Jordan, E., Cowan, A., & Roberts, J. (1995). Knowing the rules: Discursive strategies in young children’s power struggles. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 339–358.
Kalliala, M. (2006). Play culture in a changing world (Debating play series). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Kragh-Mûller, G. (2010). Perspektiver på kvalitet i daginstitutioner. Forskningsrapport, DPU. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet.
Lancy, D. F. (1984). Play in anthropological perspective. In P. K. Smith (Ed.), Play in animals and humans. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2003). Situeret læring – og andre tekster. København: Hans Reitzel.
Lillard, A. S. (1993). Young children’s conceptualization of pretence: Action or mental representational state? Child Development, 64, 372–386.
Lillard, A. S. (2002). Pretend play and cognitive development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive development. London: Blackwell.
Lindqvist, G. (2002). Lekens Estetik [Aesthetics of playing]. Psyke & Logos, 23, 437–450.
Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations – Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.
Piaget, J. (1966). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.
Piaget, J. (1976). Mastery play. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylvia (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.
Polgar, K. S. (1976, October). The social context of games: Or when is play not play? Sociology of Education, 49, 265–271.
Schousboe, I. (2013a). The structure of fantasy play and its implications for good and evil games (Chapter 2). In I. Schousboe & D. Winther-Lindqvist (Eds.), Children’s play and development: Cultural-historical perspectives (pp. 13–27). Dordrecht: Springer.
Schousboe, I. (2013b). What if thinking and the persistency perspective on playfulness (Chapter 12). In I. Schousboe & D. Winther-Lindqvist (Eds.), Children’s play and development: Cultural-historical perspectives (pp. 197–214). Dordrecht: Springer.
Schwartzman, H. (1979). The sociocultural context of play. In B. Sutton-Smith (Ed.), Play and learning. New York: Gardner Press, Inc.
Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (1990). The house of make-believe – Children’s play and the developing imagination. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sommer, D., & Samuelsson, I. P. (2010). Introduction: Child perspectives and children’s perspectives – The Scandinavian context. In D. Sommer, I. P. Samuelsson, & K. Hundeide (Eds.), Child perspectives and children’s perspectives in theory and practice. London/Dordrecht: Springer.
Spencer, C., & Blades, M. (Eds.). (2006). Children and their environments – Learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Staunæs, D. (2006). Mangfoldighedens Zombier og Kloner. Psyke & Logos, 27(2), 259–275.
Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. New York: Academic Press Inc.
Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action. Chichester: Wiley.
Vandenberg, B. (2005). Real and not real: A vital developmental dichotomy. In E. Ziegler, D. Singer, & S. Bishop-Josef (Eds.), Children’s play – The roots of reading. Washington, DC: Zero To Three Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1933). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Available online: http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1933/play.htm
Werner, H. (1961). Comparative psychology of mental development. New York: Science ed. Ink.
Winther-Lindqvist, D. (2009a). Symbolic group-play and social identity. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Symbolic transformation: The mind in movement through culture and society (Vol. 1, pp. 249–269). London/New York: Routledge.
Winther-Lindqvist, D. (2009b). Game playing: Negotiating rules and identities. American Journal of Play, 2(1), 60–84.
Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Greenwich: IAP.
Zurcher, L. A. (1983). Social roles – Conformity, conflict and creativity. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winther-Lindqvist, D. (2013). Playing with Social Identities: Play in the Everyday Life of a Peer Group in Day Care. In: Schousboe, I., Winther-Lindqvist, D. (eds) Children's Play and Development. International perspectives on early childhood education and development, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6579-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6579-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6578-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6579-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)