Skip to main content

Playing with Social Identities: Play in the Everyday Life of a Peer Group in Day Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Children's Play and Development

Abstract

In this chapter, it is argued that children when playing in day care are also playing with social identities. This holds true whenever they play together with peers, both when engaged in symbolic group play and when playing games with rules. Through Schousboe’s comprehensive model of spheres of realities in playing (see Schousboe, The structure of fantasy play and its implications for good and evil games (Chapter 2). In Schousboe I, Winther-Lindqvist D (eds.) Children’s play and development: Cultural-historical perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht, 2013) and Lev Vygotsky’s insight that all playing involve rules as well as pretence, children’s playing is analysed as an activity involving the making, remaking and exploration of social identities among the children. The paper is informed by ethnographic observations in two different Danish day-care centres and draws on illustrative examples with symbolic group playing as well as game playing with rules (soccer) among 5-year-old boys. Findings suggest that day-care children’s playing and negotiation of roles, positions and rules are intrinsically concerned with processes of social identities, both those that are anchored in the social reality and those anticipated and imagined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almqvist, B. (1994). Educational toys; creative toys. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Toys, play and child development (pp. 46–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development and adaptation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. M. (1908). Knowledge and imagination. Psychological Review, XV, 181–196. Press of the New Era Printing Company.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1976). A theory of play and fantasy. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylvia (Eds.), Play – Its role in development and evolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M., & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 163–186. Publishers Ltd.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodrova, E. (2008). Make-believe play versus academic skills: A Vygotskian approach to today’s dilemma of early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 16(3), 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, I. (1984). Representing the social world: Reality and fantasy. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play. Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, I. (1989). Pretence: The form and function of make-believe play. Developmental Review, 9, 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. (1987). The development of play (Croom Helm series). Beckenham: Croom Helm Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. (1994). Discussion, debate and friendship processes: Peer dispute in US and Italian nursery schools. Sociology of Education, 67, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. A., & Eder, D. (1990). Children’s peer cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. M., & Tarulli, D. (2003). Play as the leading activity of the preschool period: Insights from Vygotsky, Leon’ev, and Bakhtin. Early Education & Development, 14(3), 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duveen, G. (2001). Representations, identities, resistance. In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social – Bridging theoretical traditions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duveen, G., & Lloyd, B. (1993). An ethnographic approach to social representations. In G. M. Breakwell & D. V. Canter (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • El’Konin, D. (1988). Legens psykologi [Psychology of play]. Moscow: Forlaget Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S. (2005a). The narrative worlds of what is and what if. Cognitive Development, 20, 514–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S. (2005b). Real kids – Creating meaning in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, G. G. (1981). Pretend play: An integrative review. Child Development, 52, 1095–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (1983). Shared fantasy. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, O., & Leslie, A. M. (2007). The conceptual underpinnings of pretence: Pretending is not ‘behaving-as-if’. Cognition, 105, 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furth, H., & Kane, S. R. (1992). Children constructing society: A new perspective on children at play. In H. Mcgurk (Ed.), Childhood social development – Contemporary perspectives. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, C. (1977/1990). Play. London: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, L. R. (1998). Child’s play – Myth, mimesis and make-believe. Oxford/New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golomb, C., & Kuersten, R. (1996). On the transition from pretence play to reality: What are the rules of the game? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göncü, A. (1993). Intersubjectivity in the dyadic play of preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. H. (2004). The relevance of ethnicity, class, and gender in children’s peer negotiations. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groos, K. (1976/1901). The play of man: Teasing and love-play. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylvia (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1977). Rules in the explanation of social behave. In P. Collett (Ed.), Social rules and social behaviour (pp. 28–41). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M. (2007). Institutional practices, cultural positions, and personal motives: Immigrant Turkish parents’ conceptions about their children’s school life. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice – Cultural historical approaches. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitets Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendy, L., & Toon, L. (2001). Supporting drama and imaginative play in the early years. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. (1984). Gödel, Escher, Bach, an eternal golden braid. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, L. (1991). A conceptual framework for the study of children’s gaming. Play & Culture, 4, 284–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, L. (1995). Children’s games and gaming. In B. Sutton-Smith et al. (Eds.), Children’s folklore: A source book (pp. 93–119). New York/London: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, E., Cowan, A., & Roberts, J. (1995). Knowing the rules: Discursive strategies in young children’s power struggles. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalliala, M. (2006). Play culture in a changing world (Debating play series). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kragh-Mûller, G. (2010). Perspektiver på kvalitet i daginstitutioner. Forskningsrapport, DPU. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancy, D. F. (1984). Play in anthropological perspective. In P. K. Smith (Ed.), Play in animals and humans. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2003). Situeret læring – og andre tekster. København: Hans Reitzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, A. S. (1993). Young children’s conceptualization of pretence: Action or mental representational state? Child Development, 64, 372–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, A. S. (2002). Pretend play and cognitive development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive development. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindqvist, G. (2002). Lekens Estetik [Aesthetics of playing]. Psyke & Logos, 23, 437–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations – Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1966). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1976). Mastery play. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylvia (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polgar, K. S. (1976, October). The social context of games: Or when is play not play? Sociology of Education, 49, 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schousboe, I. (2013a). The structure of fantasy play and its implications for good and evil games (Chapter 2). In I. Schousboe & D. Winther-Lindqvist (Eds.), Children’s play and development: Cultural-historical perspectives (pp. 13–27). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schousboe, I. (2013b). What if thinking and the persistency perspective on playfulness (Chapter 12). In I. Schousboe & D. Winther-Lindqvist (Eds.), Children’s play and development: Cultural-historical perspectives (pp. 197–214). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, H. (1979). The sociocultural context of play. In B. Sutton-Smith (Ed.), Play and learning. New York: Gardner Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (1990). The house of make-believe – Children’s play and the developing imagination. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, D., & Samuelsson, I. P. (2010). Introduction: Child perspectives and children’s perspectives – The Scandinavian context. In D. Sommer, I. P. Samuelsson, & K. Hundeide (Eds.), Child perspectives and children’s perspectives in theory and practice. London/Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, C., & Blades, M. (Eds.). (2006). Children and their environments – Learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staunæs, D. (2006). Mangfoldighedens Zombier og Kloner. Psyke & Logos, 27(2), 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. New York: Academic Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, B. (2005). Real and not real: A vital developmental dichotomy. In E. Ziegler, D. Singer, & S. Bishop-Josef (Eds.), Children’s play – The roots of reading. Washington, DC: Zero To Three Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1933). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Available online: http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1933/play.htm

  • Werner, H. (1961). Comparative psychology of mental development. New York: Science ed. Ink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther-Lindqvist, D. (2009a). Symbolic group-play and social identity. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Symbolic transformation: The mind in movement through culture and society (Vol. 1, pp. 249–269). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther-Lindqvist, D. (2009b). Game playing: Negotiating rules and identities. American Journal of Play, 2(1), 60–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Greenwich: IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurcher, L. A. (1983). Social roles – Conformity, conflict and creativity. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ditte Winther-Lindqvist .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winther-Lindqvist, D. (2013). Playing with Social Identities: Play in the Everyday Life of a Peer Group in Day Care. In: Schousboe, I., Winther-Lindqvist, D. (eds) Children's Play and Development. International perspectives on early childhood education and development, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6579-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics