Skip to main content

Searching for Social Justice: An Examination of the Views of Alternative School Educators in the San Joaquin Valley of California

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Social (In)Justice

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 29))

Abstract

The meaning of social justice for educators who work with “at-risk” youth was explored through interviews structured to contrast the social justice thinking of John Rawls (A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971) in A Theory of Justice with that of Friedrich Hayek (Law, legislation and liberty: the mirage of social justice, vol 2. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1976) in The Mirage of Social Justice. The study was conducted with educators who work or have worked in California’s San Joaquin Valley and included a scaffolding of interviews beginning at the CA Department of Education through teachers who work directly with students. The contexts of the interviews included current educational policies such as zero tolerance, no child left behind, school choice and charter school initiatives, safe schools and resiliency strategies, and an apparent historical shift in educational thinking about social justice over the past four decades. Also, the rates of prison incarceration in the United States was discussed in the context of a quantitative study that had empirically examined the attitudes of adult leaders and student leaders on “control strategies” (zero tolerance policies) vs. “teaching and learning” (resiliency) strategies. A model of ethical thinking that included the concepts of caring, justice, and critique was presented to interviewees. The ethical concepts were explained as being connected to finding social justice and used to structure the interviews and final analysis. Analysis was completed utilizing the concepts of “street-level bureaucracy” and “silencing” in a final search for social justice that proved difficult to find.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ADL Anti-Defamation League. (1996). Advance of extremist gathering, “Hate group gathering sponsored by Jubilee Publication of Mid-Pines, CA”. Google: The Jubilee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Advancement Project. (2011). www.advancementproject.org; www.poweru.org; www.stopschoolstojail.org. See: PDF. 01-Education Report-2009v8-HiRes “Test, Punish and Pushout” & “Graphic Report: Telling it like it is” “Derailed! The schoolhouse to Jailhouse Track”.

  • Apple, M. W. (2001, January/June). Educational and curricular restructuring and the neo-liberal and neo-conservative agendas: Interview with Michael Apple. Currículo sem Fronteiras 1(1) i–xxvi, Online: www.curriculosemfronteiras.org

  • Beck, L. G. (1992, August). Meeting the challenge of the future: The place of a caring ethic in educational administration. American Journal of Education, 100(4), 454–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L. G. (2011). This is Professor Beck’s quote as she assisted through discussion on the initial conceptual framework, building from her (1992, August) article.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. (2001). Education delinquency, and Incarceration. In Zero tolerance: Resisting the drive for punishment in our schools. New York: New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, B. (2004). Resiliency: What we have learned. San Francisco: WestEd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, B. (2011, December 22). New life for shuttered Mariposa elementary school. Merced Sun-Star, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkley, K., & Fisler, J. (2003). A decade of charter schools: From theory to practice. Educational Policy, 17(3), 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Education Code. (2010). Handbook. West (Publisher). www.leginfo.ca.gov/.htm/edc

  • Chadwick, F. (2011). California on my honor: Civics Institute for Teachers. Sponsored by: California State University, San Marcos & California Administrative Office of the Courts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T., & Fu, H. (2004). Do charter schools skim students or drain resources? Economics of Education Review, 23(3), 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, J. (1996). Maximum security: The culture of violence in inner-city schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, F. W. (1994). Theory in educational administration. New York: HaperCollins/College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, N. (2009). Teacher in a strange land: Arne Duncan and Social Justice, Google Blog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. D. (1980). Free to choose. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1976). Law, legislation and liberty: The mirage of social justice (Vol. 2). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICPS: International Center for Prison Studies. (2009, Jan). World Prison Population List (8th edition) rate per 100,000 of 218 countries and territories. www.prisonstudies.org

  • Ithaca College (2012). Charter schools, education vouchers, and school choice. www.ithaca.edu/wise/school_choice/ (websites).

  • Jacob, B., & Ludwig, J. (2009). Improving educational outcomes for poor children. In M. Cancian & S. Danziger (Eds.), Changing poverty (p. XXX). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • “JCCASAC” Juvenile Court Community, and Alternative School Administrators of California. www.jccasac.org

  • Lacireno-Paquet, N., Holyoke, T., Moser, M., & Henig, J. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russel Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal, L., & Dunbar, C., Jr. (2010). In the eyes of the beholder: Urban student perceptions of zero tolerance policy. Urban Education, 45, 293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miron, L., & Mickey, L. (1998). Student voice as agency: Resistance and accommodation in inner-city schools. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 29(2), 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriquez, L. (2005). The end of the line: California gangs and the promise of street peace. Social Justice Journal, 32(3), 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackheim, D. (2009). Reaching At-Promise Students Association: Asset profiles, zero tolerance, learning & unlearning. http://www.cdsnetwork.org/pdfs/RAPSAv2.pdf

  • “SARB” In: CA Education Code (2010). Article 8. School Attendance Review Boards. See: Sec. 48320 through Sec. 48325. www.leginfo.ca.gov/.htm/edc

  • Schiraldi, V., & Ziedenberg, J. (2003). How distorted coverage of juvenile crime affects public policy. In Zero tolerance: Resisting the drive for punishment in our schools. New York: New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Sentencing Project” (the) (Research and Advocacy for Reform) (For complete statistics see U.S. Interactive Map by State). www.sentencingproject.org

  • Shields, C. (2004, February). Dialogic leadership for social justice: Overcoming pathologies of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center). (2003, Fall). Intelligence report (Issue No. 111). Mariposa, CA: SPLC. www.splcenter.org

  • Starratt, R. J. (1994). Building an ethical school: A practical response to the moral crisis in schools. Washington, DC: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swalwell, K., & Apple, M. W. (2011). Starting the wrong conversations: The public school crises and “Waiting for superman.”. Educational Policy, 25(2), 368–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner-McBrien, L., & Tracz, S. (2011). Paper presented, AERA conference, New Orleans, 2011. Impact of school mobility on academic achievement for homeless, foster and housed students. A dissertation. California State University, Fresno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrar, T. (2009). The National Teacher Corps and resistance to professional education in the 1960s. Race, Gender and Class, 16(3-4), 218–247. Southern University at New Orleans, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thernstrum, A., & Thernstrum, S. (2003). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornburg, M. J. (1986). Education vouchers: The issue of family choice in American education. A master’s thesis. The University of New Orleans, College of Urban and Regional Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornburg, M. J. (2001). School-wide discipline in urban high schools: Perceptions of violence prevention strategies. A dissertation. The University of New Orleans, College of Education, Department of Educational Leadership, Counseling & Foundations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornburg, M. J. (2012). Charter schools unfair to the poor. Merced Sunstar and Sierra Sun Times (2011–2012). Google: (Monty J. Thornburg, Charter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Timar, T. (2006). How California Funds K-12 Education. On-line, Institute for Research on Education Policy and Practice, Stanford University. Thomas Timar, University of California, Davis, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, V. (2012a). Learning to liberate: Community-based solutions to the crises in urban education. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, V. (2012b, March 24). Equity summit: (California’s third annual equity summit) Equity, education & incarceration: What is California’s future? UC Davis, School of Education, CRESS Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiher, G., & Tedin, K. (2002). Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preferences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(1), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western, B., Schiraldi, V., & Ziedenberg, J. (2003). Education & incarceration, Justice Policy Institute, v. 202.363.7847.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monty J. Thornburg Ph.D., M.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Recognitions

Recognitions

This qualitative research project truly represents the spirit of “grounded theory” as the interviewees and others participated throughout. Each read drafts throughout and approved them before the final draft was submitted. My perceptions and choice of quotes were commented on, discussed, criticized, and eventually agreed on collectively by interviewees and other participants.

I want to thank Dr. Ira Bogotch, former dissertation cochair, for contacting me about this project, and Dr. Caroline Cody, dissertation cochair, for her help to pull the final draft together. I also want to thank Dr. Lynn Beck, University of the Pacific, and Dr. Fran Chadwick, CA State University, San Marcos, for their encouragement, criticisms, and insight as I moved through a process of conceptualization and writing. I also want to thank the CRESS Center for California’s Third Annual Equity Summit – Equity, Education & Incarceration: What is California’s Future? March 24, 2012, UC Davis, School of Education. This summit provided me with thoughtful information and numerous opportunities for reflection and reanalysis of this research.

Finally, I want to thank the interviewees for their encouragement and willingness to reread drafts and make comments about the use of their quotes as I moved forward with revised iterations. I want to mention three interviewees by name: (1st) Mr. Dan Sackheim, Consultant, California Department of Education; (2nd) Mr. Paul Jacobs, Consultant, California Department of Education; and (3rd) Dr. Tanner-McBrien for her interview and for sharing insights about her dissertation with me. Other interviewees read earlier drafts and participated throughout but chose not to be mentioned.

Monty J. Thornburg, Ph.D., (Author)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thornburg, M.J. (2014). Searching for Social Justice: An Examination of the Views of Alternative School Educators in the San Joaquin Valley of California. In: Bogotch, I., Shields, C. (eds) International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Social (In)Justice. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6555-9_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics