Skip to main content

The Nature of Evolutionary Biology: At the Borderlands Between Historical and Experimental Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Philosophy of Biology

Part of the book series: History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences ((HPTL,volume 1))

Abstract

For some time now, both biologists and philosophers of science have been struggling with the nature of evolutionary biology as a discipline. On the one hand, and dating back to Ronald Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection, the claim is that evolutionary biology is a predictive science based on rigorous mathematical foundations—indeed, Fisher consciously styled his theorem after the second principle of thermodynamics in physics, the (presumed) queen of sciences. On the other hand, Fisher’s historical antagonist, Sewall Wright, emphasized the role of chance events (random drift) in countering and sometimes thwarting natural selection. The debate became central to Stephen Gould’s attempt in the 1980s to establish paleontology, the quintessential historical science within biology, as a “nomothetic” (i.e., aiming at the discovery of general laws) enterprise, while at the same time acknowledging the macroevolutionary import of chance events like the asteroidal impact that caused the extinction of so many species at the end of the Cretaceous. In this chapter I will deploy a novel philosophical analysis by Carol Cleland and examine recent experimental results on the replicability of evolutionary trajectories, to clarify the status of evolutionary biology as a discipline and that of the relative role of what Jacques Monod referred to as chance and necessity in biological explanations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bacon, F. 1620/2000. The new organon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J. 2006. Replaying life’s tape. Journal of Philosophy 103: 336–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudry, M., and J. Braeckman. 2010. Immunizing strategies and epistemic defense mechanisms. Philosophia 39(1): 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigandt, I. 2007. Typology now: Homology and developmental constraints explain evolvability. Biology and Philosophy 22: 709–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catley, K.M. 2006. Darwin’s missing link—A novel paradigm for evolution education. Science & Education 90: 767–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, J.A. 1981. Hydromechanical design of fossil cephalopods. Systematics Association Special Volume 18: 289–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapuis, E., G. Martin, and J. Goudet. 2008. Effects of selection and drift on G matrix evolution in a heterogeneous environment: A multivariate Qst–Fst test with the freshwater snail Galba truncatula. Genetics 180: 2151–2161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C.E. 2002. Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science 69: 474–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C.E. 2011. Prediction and explanation in historical natural science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62: 551–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S., D. Sultemeyer, and G. Bell. 2006. Rewinding the tape: Selection of algae adapted to high CO2 and current and Pleistocene levels of CO2. Evolution 60: 1392–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J.A., N.H. Barton, and M. Turelli. 1997. A critique of Sewall Wright’s shifting balance theory of evolution. Evolution 51: 643–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection: Or, the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, F. 1903. More letters of Charles Darwin. A record of his work in a series of hitherto unpublished letters. London: John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N., and S.J. Gould. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In Models in paleobiology, ed. T.J.M. Schopf, 82–115. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, S.A., and M. Slatkin. 1992. Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7: 92–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. 1980. The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline. Paleobiology 6: 96–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., and E.S. Vrba. 1982. Exaptation—A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8: 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, D.L., and A.G. Clark. 1997. Principles of population genetics. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, T., N. Ray, D. Wegmann, and L. Excoffier. 2008. Large allele frequency differences between human continental groups are more likely to have occurred by drift during range expansions than by selection. Annals of Human Genetics 73: 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. 1973. Darwin and his critics: The reception of Darwin’s theory of evolution by the scientific community. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. 1748/1952. An enquiry concerning human understanding. Charleston, SC: Forgotten Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. 1942/2010. Evolution: The modern synthesis: The definitive edition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, D. 2005. Evolutionary innovations in the fossil record: The interaction of ecology, development and macroevolution. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 304B: 504–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. 1978. The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Love, A. 2009. Marine invertebrates, model organisms, and the modern synthesis: Epistemic values, evo-devo, and exclusion. Theory in Bioscience 128: 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. 2007. The origins of genome architecture. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, G.R. 2006. The geometry of evolution: Adaptive landscapes and theoretical morphospaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Millstein, R.L., R.A. Skipper, Jr., and M.A. Dietrich. 2009. (Mis)interpreting mathematical models: Drift as a physical process. Philosophy & Theory in Biology. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.6959004.0001.002.

  • Monod, J. 1971. Chance and necessity: An assay on the natural philosophy of modern biology. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G. 2007. Evo-devo: Extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Reviews Genetics 8: 943–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L.S., and G.M. Sinatra. 2010. Shifting acceptance of evolution: Promising evidence of the influence of the understanding evolution website. The Researcher 23: 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, S. 2006. Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, S. 2008. Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection—A philosophical analysis. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59: 319–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M. 2002. Denying evolution. Creationism, scientism, and the nature of science. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M. 2008. Sewall Wright’s adaptive landscapes: 1932 vs. 1988. Biology and Philosophy 23: 591–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M., and J. Kaplan. 2006. Natural selection and fitness: after the “force” metaphor. In Making sense of evolution. The conceptual foundations of evolutionary biology, 13–35. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M., and G. Müller. 2010. Evolution, the extended synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J.R. 1964. Strong inference. Science 146: 347–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prothero, D. 2009. Stephen Jay Gould: Did he bring paleontology to the “High Table”? Philosophy & Theory in Biology. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.6959004.0001.001.

  • Provine, W.B. 2001. The origins of theoretical population genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup, D.M. 1967. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: Coiling in ammonoids. Journal of Paleontology 41: 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup, D.M., and S.J. Gould. 1974. Stochastic simulation and evolution of morphology—Towards a nomothetic paleontology. Systematic Zoology 23: 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recker, D. 2010. How to confuse organisms with mousetraps: Machine metaphors and intelligent design. Zygon 45: 647–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. 1975. Darwin’s debt to philosophy: An examination of the influence of the philosophical ideas of John F.W. Herschel and William Whewell on the development of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 6: 159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. 2000. Darwin and the philosophers: Epistemological factors in the development and reception of the origin of species. In Biology and epistemology, ed. R. Creath and J. Maienschein, 3–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxer, G., M. Doebeli, and M. Travisano. 2010. The repeatability of adaptive radiation during long-term experimental evolution of Escherichia coli in a multiple nutrient environment. PLoS One 5: e14184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. 2010. Natural selection, causality, and laws: What Fodor and Piattelli-Palmarini got wrong. Philosophy of Science 77: 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K. 2007. Dawkins vs. Gould: Survival of the fittest. Cambridge: Icon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M.J. 1992. Sewall Wright: Gene interaction and the shifting balance theory. In Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, vol. 8, ed. D.J. Futuyma and J. Antonovics, 35–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, R., D. Schneider, C.L. Winkworth, M.A. Riley, and R.E. Lenski. 2006. Tests of parallel molecular evolution in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 9107–9112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Pigliucci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pigliucci, M. (2013). The Nature of Evolutionary Biology: At the Borderlands Between Historical and Experimental Science. In: Kampourakis, K. (eds) The Philosophy of Biology. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics