Skip to main content

Educational Lessons from Evolutionary Properties of the Sexual Genome

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Philosophy of Biology

Part of the book series: History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences ((HPTL,volume 1))

  • 2760 Accesses

Abstract

The sexual genome (the full suite of genetic material within each cell of a sexual species) is an object of wonder for scientists and philosophers alike. By any criterion, it ranks among the most complex and sophisticated apparatuses known to humanity, yet it also performs like a Rube-Goldberg device that malfunctions routinely with oft-disastrous consequences for an organism’s wellbeing. To reconcile such seemingly contradictory perspectives on genomic operations, gene-centric reasoning that focuses on the concept of selfish DNA appears at present to be a fruitful scientific approach. The basic idea is that sequence proliferation via successful DNA replication is a key aspect of the evolutionary game especially when the best interests of genes versus organisms come into conflict, as they often do. From this neo-Darwinian insight flow biological predictions that reconcile otherwise enigmatic structural and functional properties of sexual genomes, including many recently uncovered features of nuclear DNA in Homo sapiens. Thus, we might suppose that molecular genetics and evolutionary genomics would be centerpieces of academic curricula in biology and medicine. The fact that they are not has historical and sociological roots that help to explain why the genomic revolution, now entering its second decade, has barely begun to reach its tremendous potential for illuminating the human condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avise, J.C. 1998. The genetic Gods: Evolution and belief in human affairs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avise, J.C. 2001. Evolving genomic metaphors: A new look at the language of DNA. Science 294: 86–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avise, J.C. 2006. Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution, 2nd ed. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avise, J.C. 2010a. Inside the human genome: A case for non-intelligent design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Avise, J.C. 2010b. Footprints of non-sentient design inside the human genome. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 8969–8976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F.J. 2007. Darwin’s gift to science and religion. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P.H., P.J. Gautrey, S. Herbert, D. Kohn, and S.A. Smith. 1987. Charles Darwin’s notebooks, 1836–1844. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behe, M. 1996. Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. 1982. The masterpiece of nature: The evolution and genetics of sexuality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T.R. 2010. How stupid not to have thought of that: Post-copulatory sexual selection. Journal of Zoology 281: 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, C. 2005. Genetic code, text, and scripture: Metaphors and narration in German molecular biology. Science in Context 18: 629–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, A., and R. Trivers. 2006. Genes in conflict: The biology of selfish genetic elements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M., M.G. Haselton, T.K. Shackelford, L. Bleske, and J.C. Wakefield. 1998. Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. The American Psychologist 53: 533–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condit, C.M. 1999. The meaning of the gene. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordaux, R., R.J. Hedges, S.W. Herke, and M.A. Batzer. 2006. Estimating the retrotransposition rate of human Alu elements. Gene 373: 134–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.D. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, F (Ed.). 1887. Charles Darwin’s autobiography. New York: Basic Books 1959 Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species, 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1967. The biology of ultimate concern. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1973. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher 35: 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., and E.S. Vrba. 1982. Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8: 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig, D. 1993. Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. The Quarterly Review of Biology 68: 495–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S. 1932. The causes of evolution. London: Longmans & Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, D.J., and P.L. Deininger. 2007. Inviting instability; transposable elements, double-strand breaks, and the maintenance of genomic integrity. Mutation Research 616: 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, D.A. 1982. Selfish DNA: A sexually-transmitted nuclear parasite. Genetics 101: 519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E.F. 2002. Making sense of life: Explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217: 624–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., and T. Ohta. 1971. Theoretical aspects of population genetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J.L., and T.H. Jukes. 1969. Non-Darwinian evolution: Random fixation of selectively neutral mutations. Science 164: 788–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lander, E.S., et al. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409: 860–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1974. The genetic basis of evolutionary change. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupski, J.R. 1998. Genomic disorders: Structural features of the genome can lead to DNA rearrangements and human disease traits. Trends in Genetics 14: 417–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. 2007. The origins of genome architecture. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1977. Why does the genome not congeal? Nature 268: 693–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The evolution of sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, G.J. 1865. Versuche ueber Pflanzenhybriden, Verhandlungen des Naturforschenden Vereins (Bruenn) 4:3–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAS, National Academy of Sciences. 2008. Science, evolution, and creationism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D. 2001. Molecular metaphors: The gene in popular discourse. Nature Reviews Genetics 2: 555–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Numbers, R. 2006. The creationists: From scientific creationism to intelligent design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olby, R. 1985. The origins of Mendelism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, W. 1802. Natural theology; or evidence of the existence and attributes of the deity, collected from the appearances of nature. London: Fauldner.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prak, E.T.L., and H.H. Kazazian. 2000. Mobile elements and the human genome. Nature Review Genetics 1: 134–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provine, W.B. 1971. The origins of theoretical population genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. 1691. The wisdom of god manifested in the works of creation. London: Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E.C. 2004. Evolution versus creationism. London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, L. 2001. Genome annotation: From sequence to biology. Nature Review Genetics 2: 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.R. 1967. Why does the genome not congeal? Evolution 21: 645–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter, J.G., et al. 2001. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291: 1304–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1992. Natural selection: Domains, levels, and challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V.C. 1962. Animal dispersion in relation to social behavior. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments 

The author’s research and writing are supported by funds from the University of California at Irvine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John C. Avise .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Avise, J.C. (2013). Educational Lessons from Evolutionary Properties of the Sexual Genome. In: Kampourakis, K. (eds) The Philosophy of Biology. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics