Abstract
Philanthropic partners in three metropolitan areas of Northeast Wisconsin collaborated to study quality of life using a mixed-method approach that enabled them to develop common indicators. The research was done in such a way that data could be aggregated regionally, shared and analyzed collectively, and compiled into a comprehensive report for the entire region. With the LIFE Study (an acronym for Leading Indicators for Excellence), each metro area compiled secondary, public opinion, and qualitative data to provide a rich data resource for its community and create a dashboard of leading indicators. Triangulation of the data revealed strong themes of local strengths and areas of concern. The Fox River Region LIFE Study demonstrates the feasibility of a collaborative project to compile data on quality of life at the regional level and offers a number of insights that will assist others in designing an approach that leads to regional action.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alliance for Regional Stewardship. (2005). Regional indicators: Telling stories, measuring trends, inspiring actions (pp. 1–36). ARS Monograph Series. Denver, Co.
Barsell, K., & Maser, E. (2004). Taking indicators to the next level: Truckee meadows tomorrow launches quality of life compacts. In M. Sirgy et al. (Eds.), Community-quality-of-life indicators: Best cases (pp. 53–74). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Burk, J., & Knopf, R. (2009). Improving the quality of life in a city of Phoenix, Arizona neighborhood through collaborative investment. In M. Sirgy et al. (Eds.), Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases IV (pp. 1–24). New York: Springer.
Creswell, J., & Plano-Clark, V. (2007). Understanding mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Epley, D., & Menon, M. (2008). A method of assembling cross-sectional indicators into a community quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 281–296.
Few, S. (2009). Now you see it. Oakland, CA: Analytics Press.
Gahin, R., & Paterson, C. (2001). Community Indicators: Past, present, future. In National civic review (pp. 347–358). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Golob, A. (2009). The long island index: New approaches to telling a region’s story. In M. Sirgy et al. (Eds.), Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases IV (pp. 25–58). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hardi, P., & Pinter, L. (2006). City of Winnepeg quality-of-life indicators. In M. Sirgy et al. (Eds.), Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases II (pp. 127–176). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
McCarthy, K., Ondaatje, E., Zakaras, L., & Brooks, A. (2004). Gifts of the muse reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators of sustainable community 1998: A status report on long-term cultural, economic, and environmental health for Seattle/King County (p. 4). Seattle, WA: Sustainable Seattle.
The New North. (2011). About New North. Retrieved from http://www.thenewnorth.com/thenewnorth/about+new+north+inc/default.asp
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Retrieved December 15, 2011, from 2010 Census: http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1&prodType=table
Warner, J. (2006). The Jacksonville, Florida experience. In M. Sirgy et al. (Eds.), Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases II (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice: A brief introduction (p. 1). Retrieved from http://www.ewenger.com/theory
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Warner, L.H., Heath, A.A. (2013). The Fox River Region Leading Indicators for Excellence: The Benefits and Challenges of Regional Collaboration. In: Sirgy, M., Phillips, R., Rahtz, D. (eds) Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases VI. Community Quality-of-Life Indicators, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6501-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6501-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6500-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6501-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)