Skip to main content

The Fox River Region Leading Indicators for Excellence: The Benefits and Challenges of Regional Collaboration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases VI

Part of the book series: Community Quality-of-Life Indicators ((CQLI,volume 4))

Abstract

Philanthropic partners in three metropolitan areas of Northeast Wisconsin collaborated to study quality of life using a mixed-method approach that enabled them to develop common indicators. The research was done in such a way that data could be aggregated regionally, shared and analyzed collectively, and compiled into a comprehensive report for the entire region. With the LIFE Study (an acronym for Leading Indicators for Excellence), each metro area compiled secondary, public opinion, and qualitative data to provide a rich data resource for its community and create a dashboard of leading indicators. Triangulation of the data revealed strong themes of local strengths and areas of concern. The Fox River Region LIFE Study demonstrates the feasibility of a collaborative project to compile data on quality of life at the regional level and offers a number of insights that will assist others in designing an approach that leads to regional action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alliance for Regional Stewardship. (2005). Regional indicators: Telling stories, measuring trends, inspiring actions (pp. 1–36). ARS Monograph Series. Denver, Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsell, K., & Maser, E. (2004). Taking indicators to the next level: Truckee meadows tomorrow launches quality of life compacts. In M. Sirgy et al. (Eds.), Community-quality-of-life indicators: Best cases (pp. 53–74). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burk, J., & Knopf, R. (2009). Improving the quality of life in a city of Phoenix, Arizona neighborhood through collaborative investment. In M. Sirgy et al. (Eds.), Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases IV (pp. 1–24). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., & Plano-Clark, V. (2007). Understanding mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epley, D., & Menon, M. (2008). A method of assembling cross-sectional indicators into a community quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Few, S. (2009). Now you see it. Oakland, CA: Analytics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahin, R., & Paterson, C. (2001). Community Indicators: Past, present, future. In National civic review (pp. 347–358). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob, A. (2009). The long island index: New approaches to telling a region’s story. In M. Sirgy et al. (Eds.), Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases IV (pp. 25–58). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hardi, P., & Pinter, L. (2006). City of Winnepeg quality-of-life indicators. In M. Sirgy et al. (Eds.), Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases II (pp. 127–176). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, K., Ondaatje, E., Zakaras, L., & Brooks, A. (2004). Gifts of the muse reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators of sustainable community 1998: A status report on long-term cultural, economic, and environmental health for Seattle/King County (p. 4). Seattle, WA: Sustainable Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • The New North. (2011). About New North. Retrieved from http://www.thenewnorth.com/thenewnorth/about+new+north+inc/default.asp

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Retrieved December 15, 2011, from 2010 Census: http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1&prodType=table

  • Warner, J. (2006). The Jacksonville, Florida experience. In M. Sirgy et al. (Eds.), Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases II (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice: A brief introduction (p. 1). Retrieved from http://www.ewenger.com/theory

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lora H. Warner Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Warner, L.H., Heath, A.A. (2013). The Fox River Region Leading Indicators for Excellence: The Benefits and Challenges of Regional Collaboration. In: Sirgy, M., Phillips, R., Rahtz, D. (eds) Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases VI. Community Quality-of-Life Indicators, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6501-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics