Skip to main content

Building a “Quality in Work” Index in Spain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases VI

Part of the book series: Community Quality-of-Life Indicators ((CQLI,volume 4))

Abstract

The European Union launched the Lisbon Strategy in 2000 with the aim of establishing itself as the world’s most competitive knowledge-based economy. At the same time, job quality was placed at the top of the European employment and social policy agenda and, later, it was to be incorporated as part of the European Employment and Europe-2020 Strategies. However, in a climate of economic crisis, it is argued that the price we are paying for continued economic growth is the dehumanisation of labour relationships with good jobs being substituted by bad jobs. In order to appraise such claims, scholars require quantifiable measures. The aim of this study is to define and apply a composite index of the quality in work in Spain. We present the results for the period 2001–2009. Our measure adopts the dimensional framework provided by the European Commission, and we present our results by region, sector, professional category and firm size. We find that the best results are recorded in the most developed regions, in the service sector, in the largest firms and in jobs in which workers are entrusted with most responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The words were used as the title for an interview with the sociologist Richard Sennett, published by the Spanish newspaper, La Vanguardia, on 20th December 2006.

  2. 2.

    For a review of how the concept has been dealt with in the academic literature, see Martel and Dupuis (2006).

  3. 3.

    See Royuela et al. (2003) for details of this methodology.

  4. 4.

    Additional analyses of the Spanish labour market can be found in Bentolila and Dolado (1994), Dolado et al. (2002), Bentolila and Jimeno (2003), Bank of Spain (2009), and Royuela and Sanchis-i-Marco (2010).

  5. 5.

    Note that owing to the fact that the Quality of Life at Work Survey was not conducted by the Labour Ministry in 2005, this year was eventually excluded.

References

  • Aguayo, E. (2011). Determinant factors in regional econometric models of internal migration. Revista Galega de Economía, 20, 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of Spain. (2009). El funcionamiento del mercado de trabajo y el aumento del paro en España. Boletin Economico, July-August 2009. Retrieved from http://www.bde.es/webbde/SES/Secciones/Publicaciones/InformesBoletinesRevistas/BoletinEconomico/09/Jul/Ficheros/art3.pdf

  • Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). Technological diffusion, convergence, and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., Philipson, T. J., & Soares, R. R. (2005). The quantity and quality of life and the evolution of world inequality. American Economic Review, 95, 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentolila, S., & Dolado, J. J. (1994). Labour flexibility and wages: Lessons from Spain. Economic Policy, 8(18), 54–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentolila, S., & Jimeno, J. F. (2003). Spanish unemployment: The end of the wild ride? (FEDEA working paper series 2003–10). Madrid: FEDEA. Available at: http://www.fedea.es/pub/Papers/2003/dt2003-10.pdf

  • Bivand, R., & Brunstad, R. (2005). Regional growth in Western Europe: Detecting spatial misspecification using the R environment. Amsterdam: 45th Congress of the European-Regional-Science-Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., & Morrisson, C. (2002). Inequality among world citizens: 1820-1992. American Economic Review, 92, 727–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E. (2005). Your money or your life: Changing job quality in OECD countries. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(3), 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolado, J. J., García-Serrano, C., & Jimeno, J. F. (2002). Drawing lessons from the boom of temporary jobs in Spain. The Economic Journal, 112(480), F270–F295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorius, S. F. (2008). Global demographic convergence? A reconsideration of changing intercountry inequality in fertility. Population and Development Review, 34, 519–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, J. (2011). Regional industrial structure concentration in the United States: Trends and implications. Economic Geography, 87(4), 421–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurofund. (2007). Quality of work and employment in Europe. Brussels: European Social Observatory. Available at http://www.eurofound.europa.eu

  • Eurofund. (2009). Convergence and divergence of working conditions in Europe: 1990–2005. Brussels: European Social Observatory. Available at http://www.eurofound.europa.eu

  • Goesling, B., & Firebaugh, G. (2004). The trend in international health inequality. Population and Development Review, 30, 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaumotte, F. (2011). The Spanish labor market in a cross-country perspective (IMF working paper WP/11/11). Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund. Available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp1111.pdf

  • Lopez-Bazo, E., Vaya, E., Mora, A. J., & Surinach, J. (1999). Regional economic dynamics and convergence in the European Union. Annals of Regional Science, 33, 343–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic-growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel, J.-P., & Dupuis, G. (2006). Quality of work life: Theoretical and methodological problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument. Social Indicators Research, 77, 333–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2003). Beyond income: Convergence in living standards, big time. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14, 275–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, D. (2000). Some evidence for the convergence of employment structures in the British urban system from 1978 to 1991. Regional Studies, 34, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. T. (1993). Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. European Economic Review, 37(2–3), 426–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. T. (1996). Empirics for economic growth and convergence. European Economic Review, 40(6), 1353–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royuela, V., Suriñach, J., & Reyes, M. (2003). Measuring quality of life in small areas over different periods of time. Social Indicators Research, 64(1), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royuela, V., López-Tamayo, J., & Suriñach, J. (2008). The institutional vs. the academic definition of the quality of work life. What is the focus of the European Commission? Social Indicators Research, 86(3), 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royuela, V., & Artis, M. (2006). Convergence analysis in terms of quality of life in the urban systems of the Barcelona province, 1991–2000. Regional Studies, 40, 485–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royuela, V., López-Tamayo, J., & Suriñach, J. (2009). Results of a quality of work life index in Spain. A comparison of survey results and aggregate social indicators. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royuela, V., & Sanchis-i-Marco, M. (2010). La reforma de la contratación en el mercado de trabajo: Entre la flexibilidad y la seguridad. Papeles de Economía Española, 124, 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royuela, V., & García, G. A. (2013). Economic and social convergence in Colombia. Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.762086 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennet, R. (2006). La Nueva Cultura del Capitalismo. Barcelona: Anagrama Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Review, 32(2), 334–361.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Vicente Royuela acknowledges the support of ECO2010-16006, and Jordi Suriñach the support of ECO2009-12678. All the authors acknowledge the Ministerio de Trabajo e Inmigración their database “Encuesta de Condiciones de Vida en el Trabajo”. Also they would like to thank the support from Manpower Professional.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi López-Tamayo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: Data, Indicators, and Measurement of Spanish Quality of Work

Appendix 1: Data, Indicators, and Measurement of Spanish Quality of Work

In the following pages we display the ten dimensions and related concepts, the indicators proposed by the EC, and the indicators proposed for Spain.

DIMENSION: 1. Intrinsic Job Quality

  • CONCEPT (C): Job satisfaction among workers, taking account of job characteristics, contract type, ours worked and the level of qualification relative to job requirements.

  • INDICATORS-EC (IEC): Satisfaction with type of work in present job; skills needed for current job provided by formal training or education; the possession of skills or qualifications to do a more demanding job than the current one (overqualified).

  • INDICATORS-SPAIN (IS): Workers degree of satisfaction (Source [S]: Quality of Work Life Survey [ECVT]. Availability [Av]: Region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); total labour cost (S: Labour Status Survey, Labour Ministry. Av: region and sector. 2001–2004); average earning per worker per month (S: Salary Structure Survey, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2002).

  • C: Proportion of workers advancing to higher paid employment over time.

  • IEC: Current net monthly wage.

  • IS: Interannual increase in total labour cost (S: Labour Status Survey, Labour Ministry; Av: region and sector. 2001–2004).

  • C: Low wage earners, working poor, and the distribution of income.

  • IEC: Proportion of employees earning less than 60 % of median income; is the household able to make ends meet?; Income distribution as measured by the S80/S20 income quantile ratio.

  • IS: Proportion of households with earnings (S: Continuous Survey of Family Budgets, Av: region, 2001–2004); median of households’ net earnings (S: ECVT. Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004).

DIMENSION: 2. Skills, Life-Long Learning and Career Development

  • C: Proportion of workers with medium and high levels of education.

  • IEC: Persons in employment with medium and high educational attainment level (ISCED) as a percentage of the employed population.

  • IS: Workers classified by education: average number of years in education (S: Bancaja: “El Capital Humano en España”, Av: region and sector, 2002); workers classified by education: proportion of active workers with higher education (S: Bancaja: “El Capital Humano en España”, Av: region and sector, 2002); active population classified by educational level: average number of years in education (S: Active Population Survey EPA, Av: region, 2001–2004); workers classified by education: proportion of active workers with higher education (S: EPA, Av: region, 2001–2004); proportion of workers with higher education (S: ECVT; Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004).

  • C: Proportion of workers undertaking training or other forms of life-long learning.

  • IEC: Participation rate in education and training as defined by the percentage of the population participating in education and training by sex, age groups (25–34, 35–44, and 45–64 years old) and working status (employed, unemployed, inactive); percentage of the population aged 25–64 participating in education and training, by sex; percentage of workforce participating in job-related training, by sex (some doubts about the notion of workforce).

  • IS: Occupational training course: finished courses per 10.000 workers (S: Labour Ministry Yearbook MTAS, Av: region and sector, 2001–2003); occupational training course: students per 100 workers (S: Labour Ministry Yearbook MTAS, Av: region and sector, 2001–2003); proportion of workers who have finished training courses (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers who finished useful training courses (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); training days financed by the firm (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004).

  • C: Proportion of workers with basic or higher levels of digital literacy.

  • IEC: Currently not entirely available.

  • IS: Currently not entirely available.

DIMENSION: 3. Gender Equality

  • C: Gender pay gap, appropriately adjusted for such factors as sector, occupation and age.

  • IEC: ratio of women’s hourly earnings index to men’s for paid employees at work 15 + hours by job content and education.

  • IS: Average earning ratio (women/men) (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); salary earnings: gender differences (S: Salary Structure Survey, Av: region, sector and professional rate, 2002).

  • C: Gender segregation – extent to which women and men are over or under-represented in different professions and sectors.

  • IEC: Average national proportion of employment for women and men applied to employment in each sector/occupation. The differences are added and related to total employment to obtain a gender imbalance figure.

  • IS: Proportion of women workers, classified by sector and firm size (S: Labour Status Survey. MTAS, Av: Sector and firm size, 2001–2004); activity rate: gender differences (S: EPA, Av: region, 2001–2004); Unemployment rate: gender differences (S: EPA, Av: region, 2001–2004).

  • C: Proportion of women and men with different levels of responsibility within professions and sectors, taking account of factors such as age and education.

  • IEC: Employment of women and men, by level of responsibility within firms and by sector (adjustment for age and education); job status (supervisory, intermediate, non-supervisory) by occupation or industry.

  • IS: Proportion of women working as member of the board of a firm in comparison with the proportion of men on the board (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004).

DIMENSION: 4. Health and Safety at Work

  • C: Composite indicators of accidents at work – fatal and serious – including costs; total and mean number of days lost due to accidents at work, by sex; occupational diseases, by sex; rates of occupational disease, including new risks e.g. repetitive strain injury.

  • IEC: Incidence rate, defined as the number of accidents at work per 100,000 persons in employment, by sex, calculated as: [number of accidents (fatal or non-fatal) / number of employed persons in the studied population] x 100 000; health problems related to making repetitive movements; working at very high speed and its effects on health.

  • IS: Accidents at different work rates (S: Labour Accidents at Work. MTAS, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004).

  • C: Stress levels and other difficulties concerning working relationships.

  • IEC: Working to tight deadlines and its effects on health.

  • IS: Proportion of workers who consider that they have to do physical work (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers who consider that their work is stressful (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers who consider that their work is dangerous (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers who consider that their work is developed in a satisfactory environment (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers who consider that their work is satisfactory in hygienic terms (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers who are satisfied with the safety measures (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004).

DIMENSION: 5. Flexibility and Security

  • C: Effective coverage of social protection systems – in terms of breadth of eligibility and level of support – for those in work, or seeking work.

  • IEC: Coverage of the employed by social insurance, as measured by the total net social/social insurance receipts in the year prior to the interview (as part of income).

  • IS: Coverage of the employed by social insurance (S: MTAS e INEM, Av: region, 2001–2004); beneficiaries of assistance insurance (S: MTAS and INEM, Av: Region. 2001–2004); benefits for retired people (S: MTAS e INEM Av: region, 2001–2004); average amount of benefits (S: MTAS and INEM, Av: Region. 2001–2004).

  • C: Proportion of workers with flexible working arrangements – as seen by employers and workers.

  • IEC: Satisfaction with working time in present job; type of employment contract, by categories: permanent, fixed-term or short-term, casual work with no contract, some other working arrangement; full-time/part-time.

  • IS: Salary differences between permanent and temporary contracts (S: Salary Structure Survey. Av: region, 2002); proportion of workers with permanent contracts (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers with permanent contracts and undesired part time jobs (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004).

  • C: Job losses – proportion of workers losing their job through redundancies; proportion of those finding alternative employment in a given period.

  • IEC: Reason for leaving a previous job; main reason for leaving last job or business.

  • IS: Unemployment rate (S: EPA, Av: region, 2001–2004).

  • C: Proportion of workers changing the geographical location of their work.

  • IEC: Data available through Eurostat but in need of analysis and presentation.

  • IS: Not available.

DIMENSION: 6. Inclusion and Access to the Labour Market

  • C: Effective transition of young people to active life.

  • IEC: Activity rate 15–24 as a proportion of the population of 15–24; youth unemployment ratio: unemployed aged 15–24 as a percentage of the population aged 15–24.

  • IS: Unemployment rate of young people (15–25) (S: EPA, Av: region, 2001–2004); employment rate of young people (15–25) (S: EPA, Av: region, 2001–2004).

  • C: Employment and long-term unemployment rates by age, educational level, region.

  • IEC: Employment rate by main age group (15–24, 25–54, 55–64, 15–64) and educational attainment levels (ISCED: high, medium and low); total long-term unemployment rate.

  • IS: Proportion of long-term unemployed workers (S: EPA, Av: region, 2001–2004).

  • C: Labour market bottlenecks and mobility between sectors and occupations.

  • IEC: None currently available; employed in current and previous job; sector of current and previous job.

  • IS: Vacancies/Unemployed workers. (S: INEM, Av: region and professional rate, 2001–2004).

DIMENSION: 7. Work Organisation and Work-Life Balance

  • C: Proportion of workers with flexible working arrangements.

  • IEC: Proportion of employees with flexible working arrangements (flexible hours, annualised hours contract, on-call work) out of total employees, by sex; number of employees working involuntary part-time as a percentage of total number of employees.

  • IS: Proportion of workers with part time contracts (S: EPA, Av: region, 2001–2004); proportion of workers with temporary contracts, per region (S: EPA, Av: region, 2001–2004); proportion of workers with temporary contracts, per sector (S: EPA, Av: sector, 2001–2004); proportion of workers with part-time jobs because they have not found a permanent job (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers with part-time jobs because they are not willing to take on a permanent job (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004).

  • C: Opportunities for maternity and paternity leave, and take-up rates; scale of child-care facilities for pre-school and primary school age groups.

  • IEC: Employed men and women on parental leave (paid and unpaid) as a proportion of all employed parents; allocation of parental leave between employed men and women as a proportion of all parental leave; children cared for (other than by the family) as a proportion of all children in the same age group. Broken down by before the non-compulsory preschool system, in non-compulsory or equivalent preschool system and compulsory primary education.

  • IS: Subsidy for infant care per 1,000 inhabitants (S: Labour Ministry Yearbook MTAS, Av: region, 2001–2004); infant services per 100,000 inhabitants (S: Labour Ministry Yearbook MTAS, Av: region, 2001–2004); primary health care per 1,000 inhabitants (S: Labour Ministry Yearbook MTAS, Av: region, 2001–2004); proportion of workers whose firms offer subsidies for nurseries (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers whose firms offer subsidies for housing (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers whose firms offer subsidies for life long learning (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers whose firms offer canteen services (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004); proportion of workers whose firms offer pension plans (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004), Proportion of workers whose firms offer other services (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004).

DIMENSION: 8. Social Dialogue and Worker Involvement and Worker Involvement

  • C: Coverage of collective agreements.

  • IEC: None currently available.

  • IS: Proportion of workers with collective agreements (S: Labour Ministry Yearbook MTAS and EPA Av: Region, sector and professional rate, 2001–2003); proportion of workers employed in firms without any structure for conducting collective negotiations (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate. 2001–2004); ratio of workers with a firm-level of collective agreement (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004).

  • C: Proportion of workers with a financial interest/participation in the firms where they are employed.

  • IEC: Percentage of business units with more than 200 employees in each country using financial participation schemes.

  • IS: Proportion of workers whose salary partly depends on the firm’s profits (S: ECVT, Av: region, sector, firm size and professional rate, 2001–2004).

  • C: Working days lost in industrial disputes.

  • IEC: Number of working days lost (1,000).

  • IS: Ratio of lost days per strikes over working days (S: Labour Ministry Yearbook MTAS, Av: region and sector, 2001–2003).

DIMENSION: 9. Diversity and Non-discrimination

  • C: Employment rates and pay gaps of older workers compared with average.

  • IEC: Total net monthly wages.

  • IS: Activity rate for workers older than 55 (S: EPA, Av: region. 2001–2004); unemployment rate of older workers (older than 55) (S: EPA, Av: Region. 2001–2004); average earnings per worker.

  • (S: Salary Structure Survey, Av: region and sector, 2002).

  • C: Employment rates and pay gaps of persons with disabilities, and persons from ethnic minorities – compared with average.

  • IEC: None currently available but some employment data is available concerning non-nationals.

  • IS: Earnings differentials by nationality (S: Salary Structure Survey, Av: sector and professional rate, 2002); Ratio of social security systems enroled in by workers over total potential workers (S: Seguridad Social e INE [Padrón], Av: region, 2001–2004); proportion of workers enroled in the social security system (S: Seguridad Social, Av: region, 2001–2004); foreigners: ratio of foreigners working in the cleaning regime (S: Seguridad Social, Av: region, 2001–2004).

  • C: Information on the existence of labour market complaints procedures, and of successful outcomes

  • IEC: None currently available.

  • IS: Not available.

DIMENSION: 10. Overall Work Performance

  • C: Average hourly productivity per worker.

  • IEC: Average productivity per hour worked, calculated as the GDP divided by the total number of hours worked during the year.

  • IS: Added value per worked hour (measured in constant euros) (S: MTAS e INE, Av: region and sector, 2001–2004).

  • C: Average annual output per worker.

  • IEC: Annual labour productivity, calculated as GDP per person employed; GDP per head of population in purchasing power parities.

  • IS: Value added per worker (measured in constant euros) (S: MTAS and INE, Av: region and sector, 2001–2004).

  • C: Average annual living standards per head of population – taking account of the rate of employment and the dependency ratio.

  • IEC: Economic dependency ratio, calculated as aged 15 + unemployed people as a percentage of total employment.

  • IS: Value added per capita (S: INE, Av: region and sector, 2001–2004); economic dependence ratio (non-workers over 15 / total employment) (S: INE and EPA, Av: region, 2001–2004).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

López-Tamayo, J., Royuela, V., Suriñach, J. (2013). Building a “Quality in Work” Index in Spain. In: Sirgy, M., Phillips, R., Rahtz, D. (eds) Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases VI. Community Quality-of-Life Indicators, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6501-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics