Skip to main content

Penile Wounding: Complications of Routine Male Circumcision in a Typical American Family Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Genital Cutting: Protecting Children from Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements
  • 1682 Accesses

Abstract

Men 18 years and older seeking medical care in a private, full-service, well-established family practice in New Mexico were offered evaluation as to circumcision status and examined with regards to documentable surgical damage from circumcision. Despite the fact that every circumcised man had visible and definable obvious and undesired surgical side-effects, ranging from minor scarring to extreme twisting and bending, only a tiny fraction of these men, including gay men, were aware of any penile abnormalities, and almost all believed their own penises were “normal”. The vast majority of the circumcisions had occurred in the newborn period and had been done for standard non-medical reasons. Contrary to assumptions by parents and physicians, most, if not all, newborn circumcisions leave the victim of the surgery in an obvious physically damaged state, which is universally ignored by the patient, his parents, and the physicians performing the surgery or caring for the male child or adult male victim of circumcision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baskin LS, Canning DA, Snyder HM, Duckett JW (1996) Treating complications of circumcision. Pediatr Emerg Care 12(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry CD Jr, Cross RR Jr (1956) Urethral meatal caliber in circumcised and uncircumcised males. Am J Dis Child 92:152–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman R (2011) Circumcision: harm and psychological factors ignored. The Bay Citizen, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Joudi M, Fathi M, Hiradfar M (2010) Incidence of asymptomatic meatal stenosis in children following neonatal circumcision. J Pediatr Urol. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.08.005

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Somani BN, Lam W, Donat R (2012) Establishing a reference range for penile length in Caucasian British men: a prospective study of 609 men. Br J Urol 109(5):740–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin WM (1881) Infantile circumcision: a cause of contraction of the external urethral meatus. Ann Anat Surg 4:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton HG (1963) Meatal size in 1,000 circumcised children form 2 weeks to 16 years of age. J Florida Med Assoc 50:137–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Osifo OD, Oriaifo IA (2009) Circumcision mishaps in Nigerian children. Ann Afr Med 8(4):266–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsky LE, Ross JH, Knipper N, Kay R (2000) Penile adhesions after neonatal circumcision. J Urol 164(2):495–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B (1995) Are Condoms the right size(s)? A method for self-measurement of the erect penis. Venereology 8(2):77–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Howe RS (2006) Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting. Clin Pediatr (Philadelphia) 45:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss HA, Larke N, Halperin D, Schenker I (2010) Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review. Biomed Central Urol 10:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams N, Kapila L (1993) Complications of circumcision. Br J Surg 80:1231–1236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Jennifer Urbina, PA, assisted with data formatting and Robert Van Howe, MD, graciously provided statistical analysis of the study findings. Continuous outcomes were assessed with t-tests, using the Welch-Saitterwaite method, and linear regression. Non-continuous outcomes were assessed using Chi square, Fisher’s exact test, and logistic regression. Multivariate analyses used backwards selection. All calculations were performed using SAS version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Fletcher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fletcher, C. (2013). Penile Wounding: Complications of Routine Male Circumcision in a Typical American Family Practice. In: Denniston, G., Hodges, F., Milos, M. (eds) Genital Cutting: Protecting Children from Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6407-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6407-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6406-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6407-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics