Advertisement

High-Throughput and Precision Phenotyping for Cereal Breeding Programs

  • Boddupalli M. PrasannaEmail author
  • Jose L. Araus
  • Jose Crossa
  • Jill E. Cairns
  • Natalia Palacios
  • Biswanath Das
  • Cosmos Magorokosho
Chapter

Abstract

Cereals hold unique position in world agriculture as a source of food, feed and diverse products of industrial importance. For several million farmers and consumers in countries with low- and middle-income, cereals (especially rice, wheat and maize) are the preferred staple food crops. The future of cereal production, and consequently, the livelihoods of several million small farmers worldwide, is therefore, dependent to a great extent on developing improved high yielding varieties of cereals.

Keywords

High Performance Liquid Chromatography Drought Stress Normalize Difference Vegetation Index Root Trait Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The support received from the ‘Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa’ (DTMA) project (funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation), and the ‘Precision phenotyping for improving drought stress tolerant maize in southern Asia and eastern Africa’ project (funded by BMZ, Germany) for implementing some of the work reported in this article is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int 11:36-42Google Scholar
  2. Aggarwal PK, Ahmad T, Groening M, Gupta M, Owano T, Baer D (2006) Laser spectroscopic analysis of stable isotopes in natural waters: a low-cost, robust technique for the use of environmental isotopes in hydrological and climate studies. In: American Geophysical Union, fall meeting 2006, Abstract #H51D-0504Google Scholar
  3. Anderson-Cook CM, Alley MM, Roygard JKF, Khosla R, Nobel RB, Doolittle JA (2002) Differentiating soil types using electromagnetic conductivity and crop yield maps. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1562–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araus JL, Amaro T, Casadesus J, Asbati A, Nachit MM (1998) Relationships between ash content, carbon isotope discrimination and yield in durum wheat. Aust J Plant Physiol 25:835–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Araus JL, Sanchez C, Edmeades GO (2011) Phenotyping maize for adaptation to drought. In: Monneveux P, Ribaut J-M (eds.) Drought phenotyping in crops: from theory to practice. Generation Challenge Programme, pp 259–282Google Scholar
  6. Araus JL, Slafer GA, Reynolds MP, Royo C (2002) Plant breeding and water stress in C3 cereals: what to Breed for? Ann Bot 89:925–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Araus JL, Slafer GA, Royo C, Serret MD (2008) Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Araus JL, Cabrera-Bosquet LL, Sánchez C (2010) Is heterosis in maize mediated through better water use? New Phytol 187:392–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arsenault JL, Poulcur S, Messier C, Guay R (1995) WinRHIZO, a root-measuring system with a unique overlap correction method. Hortic Sci 30:906Google Scholar
  10. Bänziger M, Edmeades GO, Lafitte HR (1999) Selection for drought tolerance increases maize yields over a range of N levels. Crop Sci 39:1035–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bänziger M, Edmeades GO, Beck D, Bellon M (2000) Breeding for drought and nitrogen stress tolerance in maize: from theory to practice. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  12. Bänziger M, Setimela PS, Hodson D, Vivek B (2006) Breeding for improved abiotic stress tolerance in Africa in maize adapted to southern Africa. Agric Water Manag 80:212–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bänzinger M, Araus JL (2007) Recent advances in breeding maize for drought and salinity stress tolerance. In: Jenks MA, Hasenawa PM, Jain SM (eds) Advances in molecular-breeding toward drought and salt tolerant crops. Springer, Berlin, pp 587–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barbour MM (2007) Stable oxygen isotope composition of plant tissue: a review. Funct Plant Biol 34:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barnabas B, Jager K, Feher A (2008) The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereal. Plant, Cell Environ 31:11–38Google Scholar
  16. Barnard R, de-Bello F, Gilgen AK, Buchmann N (2006) The δ18O of root crown water best reflects source water δ18O in different types of herbaceous species. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20:3799–3802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Belefant-Miller H, Porter DR, Pierce ML, Mort AJ (1994) An early indicator of resistance in barley to Russian wheat aphid. Plant Physiol 105:1289–1294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bengough AG, Mullins CE (1990) Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. J Soil Sci 41:341–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Berardo N, Pisacane V, Battiliani P, Scandolara A, Pietro A, Marocco A (2005) Rapid detection of kernel rots and mycotoxins in maize by near-infrearred reflectance spectrosocpy. J Agric Food Chem 53:8128–8134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Aust J Agric Res 56:1159–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Blum A (2009) Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crop Res 112:119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Blum A (2011) Plant breeding for water-limited environments. Springer, New York, p 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bolaños J, Edmeades GO (1996) The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize. Field Crop Res 48:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bolaños J, Edmeades GO, Martinez L (1993) Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. III. Responses in drought-adaptive physiological and morphological traits. Field Crop Res 31:269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bolduan C, Montes JM, Dhillon BS, Mirdita V, Melchinger AE (2009) Determination of mycotoxin Concentration by ELISA and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Fusarium-inoculated maize. Cereal Res Commun 37:521–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bouis HE, Welch RM (2010) Biofortification—a sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global South. Crop Sci 50:S20–S32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Boursiac Y, Boudet J, Postaire O, Luu DT, Tournaire-Roux C, Maurel C (2008) Stimulus induced downregulation of root water transport involves reactive oxygen species-activated cell signalling and plasma membrane intrinsic protein internalization. Plant J 56:207–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bruce WB, Edmeades GO, Barker TC (2002) Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. J Exp Bot 53:13–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Burlingame B, Charrondiere R, Mouille B (2009) Food composition is fundamental to the cross-cutting initiative on biodiversity for food and nutrition. J Food Compos Anal 22:361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cabrera-Bosquet L, Molero G, Nogués S, Araus JL (2009a) Water and nitrogen conditions affect the relationships of Δ13C and Δ18O with gas exchange and growth in durum wheat. J Exp Bot 60:1633–1644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cabrera-Bosquet L, Sánchez C, Araus JL (2009b) How yield relates to ash content, Δ13C and Δ18O in maize grown under different water regimes. Ann Bot 104:1207–1216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cabrera-Bosquet L, Sanchez C, Araus JL (2009c) Oxygen isotope enrichment (Δ18O) reflects yield potential and drought resistance in maize. Plant Cell Environ 32:1487–1499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cabrera-Bosquet L, Sanchez C, Rosales A, Palacios-Rojas N, Araus JL (2011a) Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) assessment of δ18O and nitrogen and ash contents for improved yield potential and drought adaptation in maize. J Agric Food Chem 59:467–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cabrera-Bosquet L, Sánchez C, Rosales A, Palacios-Rojas N, Araus JL (2011b) NIRS-assessment of δ18O, nitrogen and ash content for improved yield potential and drought adaptation in maize. J Agric Food Chem 59:467–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cabrera-Bosquet L, Crossa J, Zitzewitz JV, Serrte MD, Araus JL (2012) High throughput phenotyping and genomic selection: the frontiers of crop breeding converge. J Integr Plant Biol 54:312–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cairns JE, Aubebert A, Townend J, Price AH, Mullins CE (2004) Effect of soil mechanical impedance on root growth of two rice varieties under field drought stress. Plant Soil 267:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Cairns JE, Audebert A, Mullins CE, Price AH (2009) Mapping quantitative loci associated with root growth in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) exposed to soil water-deficit in fields with contrasting soil properties. Field Crop Res 114:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cairns JE, Impa SM, O’Toole JC, Jagadish SVK, Price AH (2011) Influence of the soil physical environment on rice (Oryza sativa L.) response to drought stress and its implications for drought research. Field Crop Res 121:303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Cairns JE, Sonder K, Zaidi PH, Verhulst N, Mahuku G, Babu R, Nair SK, Das B, Govaerts B, Vinayan MT, Rashid Z, Noor JJ, Devi P, San Vicente F, Prasanna BM (2012) Maize production in a changing climate: Impacts, adaptation and mitigation strategies. Adv Agron 114:1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Campos H, Cooper M, Habben JE, Edmeades GO, Schussler JR (2004) Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crop Res 90:19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Carcova J, Otegui ME (2007) Ovary growth and maize kernel set. Crop Sci 47:1104–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Castleberry CW, Crum CW, Krull CF (1984) Genetic yield improvement of US maize cultivars under varying fertility and climatic environments. Crop Sci 24:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Cernusak LA, Winter K, Turner BL (2009) Physiological and isotopic (δ13C and δ18O) responses of three tropical tree species to water and nutrient availability. Plant Cell Environ 32:1441–1455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Cernusak LA, Winter K, Aranda J, Turner BL, Marshall JD (2007) Transpiration efficiency of a tropical pioneer tree (Ficus insipida) in relation to soil fertility. J Exp Bot 58:3549–3566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Chun L, Mi G, Li J, Chen F, Zhang F (2005) Genetic analysis of maize root characteristics in response to low nitrogen stress. Plant Soil 276:369–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Collins NC, Tardieu F, Tuberosa R (2008) QTL approaches for improving crop performance under abiotic stress conditions: where do we stand? Plant Physiol 147:469–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Cullis BR, Gleeson AC (1991) Spatial analysis of experimental fields—an extension to two dimension. Biometrics 47:1449–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. D′ıaz-Lago JE, Stuthman KJ, Leonard DD (2003) Evaluation of components of partial resistance to oat crown rust using digital image analysis. Plant Dis 87:667–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Deol GS, Reese JC, Gill BS (1997) A rapid, nondestructive technique for assessing chlorophyll loss from Greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) feeding damage on sorghum leaves. J Kansa Entomol Soc 70:305–312Google Scholar
  50. Dixon R, Gang D, Charlton A, Fiehn O, Kuiper H, Reynolds T, Tjeerdema R, Jeffery E, German B, Ridley W, Seiber J (2006) Applications of metabolomics in agriculture. J Agric Food Chem 54:8984–8994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Dowell FE, Maghirang F, Xie F, Lookhart GL, Pierce RO, Seabourn B, Bean S, Wilson J, Chung O (2006) Predicting wheat quality characteristics and functionality using near-infrared spectroscopy. Cereal Chem 85:529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Draye X, Kim Y, Lobet G, Javaux M (2010) Model-assisted integration of physiological and environmental constraints affecting the dynamic and spatial patterns of root water uptake from soils. J Exp Bot 61:2145–2155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Duvick DN (1997) What is yield. In: Edmeades GO, Bänziger M, Mickelson HR et al. (eds) Developing drought and low-N tolerant maize. Proceedings of a symposium, 25–29 Mar 1996, CIMMYT, El Batan, pp 332–335Google Scholar
  54. Duvick DN (2005) The contribution of breeding to field advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv Agron 86:83–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Duvick DN, Smith JCS, Cooper M (2004) Changes in performance, parentage, and genetic diversity of successful corn hybrids, 1930 to 2000. In: Smith CW, Betrán J, Runge ECA (eds) Corn: origin, history, technology and production. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 65–97Google Scholar
  56. Dwivedi SL, Crouch JH, Mackill DJ, Xu Y, Blair MW, Ragot M, Upadhyaya HD, Ortiz R (2010) The molecular characterization of public sector crop breeding progress, problems and prospects. Adv Agron 95:163–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Eathington SR, Crosbie TM, Edwards MD, Reiter RS, Bull JK (2007) Molecular markers in commercial breeding. Crop Sci 47:154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Edmeades GO, Bolaños J, Chapman SC, Lafitte HR, Bänziger M (1999) Selection improves drought tolerance in tropical maize populations. I. Gains in biomass, grain yield, and harvest index. Crop Sci 39:1306–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ehleringer JR, Dawson TE (1992) Water uptake by plants: perspectives from stable isotope composition. Plant Cell Environ 15:1073–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Evenson R, Gollin D (2003) Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960–2000. Science 300:578–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, EssexGoogle Scholar
  62. Farquhar GD, Cernusak LA, Barnes B (2007) Heavy water fractionation during transpiration. Plant Physiol 143:11–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Fernandez-Ibanez V, Soldado A, Martinez-Fernandez B, De la Rosa-Delgado B (2009) Application of near infrared spectroscopy for rapid detection of aflatoxin in maize and barley as analytical quality assessment. Food Chem 113:629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Fernie AR, Schauer N (2009) Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement? Trends Genet 25:39–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ferrio JP, Mateo MA, Bort J, Voltas J, Abdahla O, ArausM JL (2007) Relationships of grain δ13C and δ18O with wheat phenology and yield under water-limited conditions. Ann Appl Biol 150:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ferrio JP, Resco V, Williams DG, Serrano L, Voltas J (2005) Stable isotopes in arid and semi-arid forest systems. Investigación Agraria, Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 14:371–382Google Scholar
  67. Finkle E (2009) With ‘Phenomics” plant scientists hope to shift breeding into overdrive. Science 325:380–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Galicia L, Nurit E, Rosales A, Palacios-Rojas N (2010) Laboratory protocols: maize nutrition quality and plant tissue analysis. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  69. González-Pérez JL, Espino-Gudiño MC, Torres-Pacheco I, Guevara-González RG, Herrera-Ruiz G, Rodríguez-Hernández V (2011) Quantification of virus syndrome in chili peppers. Afr J Biotechnol 10:5236–5250Google Scholar
  70. Gowda VRP, Henry A, Yamauchi A, Shashidhar HE, Serraj R (2011) Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crop Res 122:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Granier C, Aguirrezabal L, Chenu K, Cookson SJ, Dauzat M, Hamard P, Thioux JJ, Rolland G, Bouchier-Combaud S, Lebaudy A, Muller B, Simonneau T, Tardieu F (2005) PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytol 169:623–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hachez C, Heinen RB, Draye X, Chaumont F (2008) The expression pattern of plasma membrane aquaporins in maize highlights their role in hydraulic regulation. Plant Mol Biol 68:337–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hall R, Brouwer I, Fitzgerald M (2008) Plant metabolomics and its potential application for human nutrition. Physiol Plant 132:162–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Hall R, Fernie AR, Keurentjes J (2011) Genetics, genomics and metabolomics. Annu Plant Rev 43 (Biology of Plant Metabolomics)Google Scholar
  75. Hammer G, Dong Z, McLean G, Doherty A, Messina C, Schussler J, Zinselmeier C, Paszkiewicz S, Cooper M (2009) Can changes in canopy and/or root system architecture explain historical maize yield trends in the U.S. corn belt? Crop Sci 49:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Harrigan GG, Stork LG, Riordan S, Ridley WP, MacIsaac S, Halls S (2007) Metabolite analysis of grain from maize hybrids grown in the United States under drought and water conditions during the 2002 field season. J Agric Food Chem 55:6169–6176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Harris K, Subudhi PK, Borrell A, Jordan D, Rosenow D, Nguyen H, Klein P, Klein R, Mullet J (2007) Sorghum stay-green QTL individually reduce post-flowering drought-induced leaf senescence. J Exp Bot 58:327–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Hochholdinger F, Woll K, Sauer M, Dembinsky D (2004) Genetic dissection of root formation in maize (Zea mays) reveals root-type specific developmental programmes. Ann Bot 93:359–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Hoecker N, Keller B, Piepho HP, Hochholdinger F (2006) Manifestation of heterosis during early maize (Zea mays L.) root development. Theore Appl Genet 112:421–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Holst J, Grote R, Offermann C, Ferrio JP, Gessler A, Mayer H, Rennenberg H (2010) Water fluxes within beech stands in complex terrain. Int J Biometeorol 54:23–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Hund A, Ruta N, Liedgens M (2009) Rooting depth and water use efficiency of tropical maize. Plant Soil 318:311–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Iyer-Pascuzzi AS, Symonova O, Mileyko Y, Hao Y, Belcher H, Harer J, Weitz JS, Benfey PN (2010) Imaging and analysis platform for automatic phenotyping and trait ranking of plant root systems. Plant Physiol 152:1148–1157Google Scholar
  83. James WC (1971) An illustrated series of assessment keys for plant diseases, their preparation and usage. Can Plant Dis Surv 51:39–65Google Scholar
  84. Javaux M, Schröder T, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2008) Use of a three-dimensional detailed modeling approach for predicting root water uptake. Vadose Zone J 7:1079–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Johnson CK, Mortensen DA, Wienhold DA, Shanahan JF, Doran DW (2003) Site-specific management zones based on soil electrical conductivity in semiarid cropping systems. Agron J 95:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Jones HG, Serraj R, Loveys BR, Xiong L, Wheaton A, Price AH (2009) Thermal infrared imaging of crop canopies for the remote diagnosis and quantification of plant responses to water stress in the field. Funct Plant Biol 36:978–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Karcher DE, Richardson MD (2003) Quantifying turfgrass color using digital image analysis. Crop Sci 43:943–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kaspar TC, Colvin TS, Jaynes DB, Karlen DL, James DE, Meek DW (2003) Relationship between six years of corn yields and terrain attributes. Precision Agric 4:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Kaspar TC, Pulido DJ, Fenton TE, Colvin TS, Karlen DL, Jaynes DB, Meek DW (2004) Relationship of corn and soybean yield to soil and terrain properties. Agron J 96:700–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Lafitte HR, Edmeades GO (1994) Improvement for tolerance to low soil nitrogen in tropical maize. 1. Selection criteria. Field Crop Res 39:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Li B, Tian X-L, Wang G-W, Pan F, Li Z-H (2008) Heterosis of root growth in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings under water stress. Acta Agron Sinica 34:662–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Lis GP, Wassenaar LI, Hendry MJ (2008) High-precision laser spectroscopy D/H and 18O/16O measurements of microliter natural water samples. Anal Chem 80:287–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Liu X-F, Zhang S-Q, Yang X-Q, Shan L (2009) Heterosis of water uptake ability by roots of maize at cell level. Acta Agron Sinica 35:1546–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lopes MS, Araus JL, Van Heerden PDR, Foyer CH (2011) Enhancing drought tolerance in C4 crops. J Exp Bot 62:3135–3153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Lu Y, Hao Z, Xie C, Crossa J, Araus JL, Gao S, Vivek BS, Magorokosho C, Mugo S, Makumbi D, Taba S, Pan G, Li X, Rong T, Zhang S, Xua Y (2011) Large-scale screening for maize drought resistance using multiple selection criteria evaluated under water-stressed and well-watered environments. Field Crop Res 124:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Marshall TJ, Holmes JW, Rose CW (1996) Soil physics. Cambridge University Press, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Masle J, Farquhar GD, Wong SC (1992) Transpiration ratio and plant mineral content are related among genotypes of a range of species. Aust J Plant Physiol 19:709–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Masuka B, Araus JL, Das B, Sonder K, Cairns JL (2012) Phenotyping for abiotic stress tolerance in maize. J Integr Plant Biol 54:238–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mayland HF, Johnson DA, Asay KH, Read JJ (1993) Ash, carbon isotope discrimination and silicon as estimators of transpiration efficiency in crested wheatgrass. Aust J Plant Physiol 20:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. McLaughlin JE, Boyer JS (2004) Glucose localization in maize ovaries when kernel number decreases at low water potential and sucrose is fed to the stems. Ann Bot 94:75–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Mirik M, Michels GJ Jr, Kassymzhanova-Mirik S, Elliott NC, Catana V, Jones DB, Bowling R (2006) Using digital image analysis and spectral reflectance data to quantify damage by greenbug (Hemitera: Aphididae) in winter wheat. Comput Electron Agric 51:86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Monneveux P, Sánchez C, Tiessen A (2008) Future progress in drought tolerance in maize needs new secondary traits and cross combinations. J Agric Sci 146:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Montes J, Melchinger A, Reif J (2007) Novel throughput phenotyping platforms in plant genetic studies. Trends Plant Sci 12:433–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Montes JM, Technow F, Dhillon BS, Mauch F, Melchinger AE (2011) High-throughput non-destructive biomass determination during early plant development in maize under field conditions. Field Crop Res 121:268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Nilsson H-E (1995) Remote sensing and image analysis in plant pathology. Annu Rev Phytopathol 15:489–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Nilsson H-E, Johnsson L (1996) Hand-held radiometry of barley infected by barley stripe disease in a field experiment. J Plant Dis Prot 103:517–526Google Scholar
  107. Nurit E, Tiessen A, Pixley K, Palacios-Rojas N (2009) A reliable and inexpensive colorimetric method for determining protein-bound tryptophan in maize kernels. J Agric Food Chem 57:7233–7238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Nuss ET, Tanumihardjo SA (2010) Maize: a paramount staple crop in the context of global nutrition. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9:417–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Nutter FW Jr, Gleason ML, Jenco JH, Christians NC (1993) Assessing the accuracy, inter-rater repeatability and inter-rater reliability of disease assessment systems. Phytopathology 83:806–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. O’Brien L, Cracknell R (2009) The application of testing methods in cereals breeding programs. In: Cauvain S, Young L (eds) The ICC handbook of cereals, flour, dough and product testing. DE Stech Publications, Pennsylvania, pp 9–32Google Scholar
  111. Papadakis JS (1937) Méthode statistique pour des expériences sur champ. Bulletin Institut d’Amélioration des Plantes á Salonique 23:13–21Google Scholar
  112. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H et al (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457:551–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Patil JK, Kumar R (2011) Advances in image processing for detection of plant diseases. J Adv Bioinf Appl Res 2:135–141Google Scholar
  114. Patz N (2009) Effect of roots of different tree species on preferential flowpaths. Master’s Thesis, University of FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  115. Pena RJ, Trethowan R, Pfeiffer W, Ginkel M (2002) Quality (end-use) improvement in wheat. Compositional, genetic and environmental factors. In: Basra AS, Randhawa LS (eds) Quality improvement in field crops. Haworth Press, New York, pp 1–37Google Scholar
  116. Phillips RL (2009) Mobilizing science to break yield barriers. Crop Sci 50:99–108Google Scholar
  117. Prasanna BM, Chaikam V, Mahuku G (eds) (2012) Doubled haploid technology in maize breeding: theory and practice. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F., 50 pagesGoogle Scholar
  118. Prigge V, Sanchez C, Dhillon BS, Schipprack W, Araus JL, Bänziger M, Melchinger AE (2011) Doubled haploids in tropical maize: 1. Effects of inducers and source germplasm on in vivo haploid induction rate. Crop Sci 51:1498–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Retzlaff WA, Blaisdell GK, Topa MA (2001) Seasonal changes in water source of four families of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Trees Struct Funct 15:154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Ribaut JM, de Vicente MC, Delannay X (2010) Molecular breeding in developing countries: challenges and perspectives. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Richardson MD, Karcher DE, Purcell LC (2001) Quantifying turfgrass cover using digital image analysis. Crop Sci 41:1884–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Riedell WE, Blackmer TM (1999) Leaf reflectance spectra of cereal aphid-damaged wheat. Crop Sci 39:1835–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Röber FK, Gordillo GA, Geiger HH (2005) In vivo haploid induction in maize—performance of new inducers and significance of doubled haploid lines in hybrid breeding. Maydica 50:275–283Google Scholar
  124. Rohling R, Eder J, Engel K (2009) Metabolite profiling of maize grain: differentiation due to genetics and environment. Metabolomis 5:459–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Romano G, Zia S, Spreer W, Sanchez S, Cairns J, Araus JL, Müller J (2011) Use of thermography for screening genotypic water stress adaptation in tropical maize. Comput Electron Agric 79:61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Saab IN, Sharp RE (1989) Non-hydraulic signals from maize roots in drying soil: inhibition of leaf elongation but not stomatal conductance. Planta 179:466–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Samson BK, Sinclair TR (1994) Soil core and minirhizotron comparison for the determination of root length density. Plant Soil 161:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W et al (2010) Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463:178–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F et al (2009) The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326:1112–1115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Scholes JD, Rolfe SA (2009) Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging as tool for understanding the impact of fungal diseases on plant performance; a phenomics perspective. Funct Plant Biol 36:880–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Seebauer JR, Moose SP, Fabbri BJ, Crossland LD, Below FE (2004) Amino acid metabolism in maize earshoots. Implications for assimilate preconditioning and nitrogen signaling. Plant Physiol 136:4326–4334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Shiferaw B, Prasanna B, Hellin J, Banziger M (2011) Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Secur 3:307–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Shauer N, Fernie AR (2006) Plant metabolomics: towards biological function and mechanism. Trends Plant Sci 11:508–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Slafer GA, Araus JL (2007) Physiological traits for improving wheat yield under a wide range of conditions. In: Spiertz JHJ, Struik PC, van Laar HH (eds) Scale and complexity in plant systems research: gene-plant-crop relations. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 145–154Google Scholar
  135. Spielbauer G, Armstrong P, Baier J, Allen W, Richardson K, Shen B, Settles M (2009) High-throughput near-infrered reflectance spectroscopy for predicting quantitative and qualitative composition phenotypes of individual maize kernels. Cereal Chem 86:556–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Sudduth KA, Drummond ST, Birrell SJ, Kitchen NR (1997) Spatial modeling of crop yields using soil and topographic data. In: Stafford JV (ed) Precision agriculture. Proceedings of the 1st European conference on precision agriculture, BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 439–447Google Scholar
  137. Sutton JC (1985) Effectiveness of fungicides for managing foliar diseases and promoting yields of Ontario winter wheat. Phytoprotection 66:141–152Google Scholar
  138. Tallada JG, Palacios-Rojas N, Armstrong PR (2009) Prediction of maize seed attributes using a rapid single kernel near infrared instrument. J Cereal Sci 50:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Tambussi EA, Bort J, Araus JL (2007) Water use efficiency in C3 cereals under Mediterranean conditions: a review of physiological aspects. Ann Appl Biol 150:307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Tambussi EA, Nogués S, Ferrio JP, Voltas J, Araus JL (2005) Does a higher yield potential improve barley performance under Mediterranean conditions? A case study. Field Crop Res 91:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Tanner W, Beevers H (1990) Does transpiration have an essential function in long distance ion transport in plants? Plant, Cell Environ 13:745–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Tardieu F (2006) Leaf growth under water-limited conditions. In: Ribaut JM (ed) Drought adaptation in cereals. The Harworth Press, New York, pp 145–169Google Scholar
  143. Tardieu F, Bruckler L, Lafolie F (1992) Root clumping may affect the root water potential and the resistance to soil-root water transport. Plant Soil 140:291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Tardieu F, Tuberosa R (2010) Dissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:206–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Toledo A, Burlingame B (2006) Biodiversity and nutrition: a common path toward global food security and sustainable development. J Food Comp Anal 19:477–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Tollenaar M, Lee EA (2002) Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crop Res 75:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Tollenaar M, Lee EA (2006) Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica 51:399–408Google Scholar
  148. Tollenaar M, Wu J (1999) Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater water stress tolerance. Crop Sci 39:1597–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Tournaire-Roux C, Sutka M, Javot H, Gout E, Gerbeau P, Luu D-T, Bligny R, Maurel C (2003) Cytosolic pH regulates root water transport during anoxic stress through gating of aquaporins. Nature 425:393–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Trachsel S, Kaeppler SM, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2011) Shovelomics: high throughput phenotyping of maize (Zea mays L.) root architecture in the field. Plant Soil 341:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Tuberosa R, Salvi S, Sanguineti MC, Landi P, Maccaferri M, Conti S (2002) Mapping QTLs regulating morphophysiological traits and yield: case studies, shortcomings and perspectives in drought-stressed maize. Ann Bot 89:941–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Tuberosa R, Salvi S, Sanguineti MC, Maccaferri M, Giuliani S, Landi P (2003) Searching for quantitative loci controlling root traits in maize: a critical appraisal. Plant Soil 255:35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Vankadavath RN, Hussain AJ, Bodanapu R, Kharshiing E, Basha PO, Gupta S, Sreelakshmi Y, Sharma R (2009) Computer aided data acquisition tool for high-throughput phenotyping of plant populations. Plant Methods 5:18. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-5-18 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Venuprasad R, Sta Cruz MT, Amante M, Magbanua R, Kumar A, Atlin GN (2008) Response to two cycles of divergent selection for grain yield under drought stress in four rice breeding populations. Field Crop Res 107:232–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Voltas J, Chambel MR, Prada MA, Ferrio JP (2008) Climate-related variability in carbon and oxygen stable isotopes among populations of Aleppo pine grown in common-garden tests. Trees Struct Funct 22:759–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Welcker C, Boussuge B, Bencivenni C, Ribaut JM, Tardieu F (2007) Are source and sink strengths genetically linked in maize plants subjected to water deficit? A QTL study of the responses of leaf growth and of anthesis-silking interval to water deficit. J Exp Bot 58:339–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Whitford R, Gilbert M, Langridge P (2010) Biotechnology in agriculture. In: Reynolds MP (ed) Climate change and crop production. CABI series in climate change, vol 1. CABI, UK, pp 219–244Google Scholar
  158. Yazdanbakhsh N, Fisahn J (2009) High throughput phenotyping of root growth dynamics, lateral root formation, root architecture and root hair development enabled by PlaRoM. Funct Plant Biol 36:938–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Yu J, Hu S, Wang J, Wong GK-S, Li S, Liu B et al. (2002). A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. spp. indica). Science 296:79–92Google Scholar
  160. Yue B, Xiong L, Xue W, Xing Y, Luo L, Xu C (2005) Genetic analysis for drought resistance of rice at reproductive stage in field with different types of soil. Theoret Appl Genet 11:1127–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Zhang J, Nguyen H, Blum A (1999) Genetic analysis of osmotic adjustment in crop plants. J Exp Bot 50:291–302Google Scholar
  162. Zheng Z, Humphrey C, King R, Richard J (2005) A review of rapid methods for the analysis of mycotoxins. Mycopatologia 159:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Zhu J, Ingram PA, Benfey PN, Elich T (2011) From lab to field, new approaches to phenotyping root system architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14:310–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Zinselmeier C, Lauer MJ, Boyer JS (1995) Reversing drought-induced losses in grain yield: sucrose maintains embryo growth in maize. Crop Sci 35:1390–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boddupalli M. Prasanna
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jose L. Araus
    • 2
  • Jose Crossa
    • 3
  • Jill E. Cairns
    • 4
  • Natalia Palacios
    • 3
  • Biswanath Das
    • 1
  • Cosmos Magorokosho
    • 4
  1. 1.International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)ICRAF House, United Nations Avenue, GigiriNairobiKenya
  2. 2.Unitat de Fisiologia Vegetal, Facultat de BiologiaUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.CIMMYTTexcocoMexico
  4. 4.CIMMYTMount Pleasant, HarareZimbabwe

Personalised recommendations