Skip to main content

Modifying the Teaching of Modifiers: A Lesson from Universal Grammar

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 16))

Abstract

This chapter considers the implications for classroom teaching and materials development of recent research on the second language acquisition of modifiers, specifically regarding word order of prepositional modifiers (e.g., right back into the desert) and attributive adjectives (e.g., great new haircut). While word order of prepositional modifiers is generally not taught in the classroom, adjectival hierarchies in contrast are covered by most ESL grammar series, although never systematically. Universal orderings of prepositional modifiers (Stringer D, Burghardt B, Seo H-K, Wang Y-T. Sec Lang Res 27:289–311, 2011) and adjectives (Cinque G. The syntax of adjectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2010) raise the question of whether orderings of modifiers need to be taught at all, or whether such hierarchies might be naturally manifested without explicit instruction. Results from experimentation targeting the acquisition of prepositional modifiers reveal innate knowledge of the syntax of modification and suggest that teaching materials should focus on the lexicon rather than word order in this domain. In contrast, results from experiments on acquisition of adjective order suggest that while a more general distinction (absolute vs. nonabsolute) may be universal, more fine-grained distinctions are poorly understood by learners even at advanced proficiency levels, regardless of first language background, and require the development of more effective teaching of word order, plausibly though enhanced input.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The ILR and the CEFR are the standard governmental language proficiency scales used in the United States and Europe, respectively.

  2. 2.

    Abbreviations used for syntactic categories are as follows: N (noun), V (verb), Adj (adjective), Adv (adverb), and P (preposition/postposition/particle); phrasal projections are abbreviated NP, VP, AdjP, AdvP, and PP.

  3. 3.

    The assumption here is that Korean adjectives are, in fact, relative clauses. The link between relative clauses and attributive adjectives is well-known, albeit complex and controversial (compare: the boy who is tall and the tall boy; the train which is moving fast and the fast-moving train). Crosslinguistically, it appears that adjectives marked with relative markers, just like relative clauses themselves, are not subject to ordering restrictions (compare: the {great new/*new great} cafe; the café {which is great and which is new/which is new and which is great}). For a review of analyses linking relatives and attributive adjectives, see Alexiadou et al. (2007).

  4. 4.

    The example in (16) is a popular English children’s song: “Twinkle, twinkle, little star / How I wonder what you are / Up above the world so high / Like a diamond in the sky.”

References

  • Alexiadou, A., L. Haegeman, and M. Stavrou. 2007. Noun Phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Azar, B.S., and S.A. Hagen. 2006a. Basic English grammar, 3rd ed. White Plains: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar, B.S., and S.A. Hagen. 2006b. Basic English grammar, 3rd ed.: Workbook. White Plains: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 57(1): 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, G. 1994. On the evidence for partial N-Movement in the Romance DP. In Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne, ed. G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, and R. Zanuttini, 85–110. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, G. 2010. The syntax of adjectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulay, H., and M. Burt. 1974. Natural sequences in child language acquisition. Language Learning 24: 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, J.E. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassi Fehri, A. 1999. Arabic modifying adjectives and DP structures. Studia Linguistica 53: 105–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S.M. (with J. Behney and L. Plonksy). 2013. Second language acquisition: An introductory course, 4th ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradman, H. 1971. The limitations of contrastive analysis predictions. Proceedings of The Pacific Conference on Contrastive Linguistics and Language Universals (PCCLLU): University of Hawai’i Working Papers in Linguistics 3/4, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, L. 2010. Well said, 3rd ed. Boston: Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. 2001. Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S.D. 1981. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lado, R. 1957. Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lado, R., and C.C. Fries. 1954. English pronunciation: Exercises in sound segments, intonation and rhythm. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laenzlinger, C. 2005. French adjective ordering: Perspectives on DP-internal movement types. Lingua 115: 645–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, J. 2000. Focus on grammar: An advanced course for reference and practice, 2nd ed. White Plains: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montrul, S. 2000. Transitivity alternations in second language acquisition: Toward a modular view of transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 229–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, J. 1974. An error in error analysis. Language Learning 24: 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B.D., and R.A. Sprouse. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G.-J. 2002. Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of nominal phrases. In Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 1, ed. G. Cinque, 91–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlonsky, U. 2004. The form of Semitic noun phrases. Lingua 114: 1465–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, R., and C. Shih. 1991. The cross-linguistic distribution of adjective ordering restrictions. In Interdisciplinary approaches to language, ed. C. Georgopoulos and R. Ishihara, 565–593. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, W., and V.L. Schafer. 2008. Speech perception in second language learners. In Phonology and second language acquisition, ed. J.G. Hansen Edwards and M.L. Zampini, 153–191. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, D. 2005. Paths in first language acquisition: Motion through space in English, French and Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, D. 2010. The gloss trap. In Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking, ed. Z.-H. Han and T. Cadierno, 102–124. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, D., B. Burghardt, H.-K. Seo, and Y.-T. Wang. 2011. Straight on through to Universal Grammar: Spatial modifiers in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 27: 289–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, D., J.-E. Choi, K. Dlamini, and C. Martin. In prep. Adjective ordering restrictions in English as a second language. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thewlis, S.H. 2007. Grammar dimensions 3: Form, meaning, and use, 4th ed. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted with the collaboration of colleagues in the Department of Second Language Studies as well as teachers and students in the Intensive English Program (IEP) at Indiana University. Many thanks especially to Kathleen Bardovi-­Harlig, Doreen Ewert, Michelle Fleener, Marlin Howard, and Heidi Vellenga. Thanks also to Stephanie Dickinson of the Indiana Statistical Consulting Center (ISCC) for her invaluable help with data analysis. The experimental work on modifiers was coauthored with graduate students who, in their own careers, are building bridges between formal L2 research and classroom pedagogy: Beatrix Burghardt, Jung-Eun Choi, Khanyisile Dlamini, Cleyera Martin, Hyun-Kyoung Seo, and Yi-Ting Wang.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Stringer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix I: The Aladdin Slides

Appendix I: The Aladdin Slides

Example Slides

 1.

Here is Aladdin. Here is the wizard. Here is a very beautiful lamp.

 2.

Aladdin and the wizard are going to the cave.

 3.

Aladdin takes the magic lamp from the wizard.

Stimulus Slides

 4.

He flies right up out of the cave.

[DEG [TRAJECT]]

 5.

He flies on through to the outside.

[FLOW [TRAJECT]]

 6.

He flies straight on over the camels.

[DEG [FLOW]]

 7.

He flies right on up into the clouds.

[DEG [FLOW [TRAJECT]]]

 8.

He goes crash into the birds.

ONOMATOPOEIA

 9.

The lamp falls right back down onto a tree.

[DEG [FLOW [TRAJECT]]]

10.

The lamp falls on down to the ground.

[FLOW [TRAJECT]]

11.

Aladdin flies right down in front of a waterfall.

[DEG [TRAJECT]]

12.

He flies whoosh over a lake.

ONOMATOPOEIA

13.

Aladdin flies straight on under a rock.

[DEG [FLOW]]

14.

Aladdin flies right on across the desert.

[DEG [FLOW]]

15.

He flies straight through into the city.

[DEG [TRAJECT]]

16.

Oh no! The lamp is not in his bag!

FILLER

17.

Aladdin flies straight back across the desert.

[DEG [FLOW]]

18.

He flies right back under the rock.

[DEG [FLOW]]

19.

He flies back over to the waterfall.

[FLOW [TRAJECT]]

20.

He flies straight down behind the tree.

[DEG [TRAJECT]]

21.

Aladdin flies right out from behind the tree.

[DEG [TRAJECT]]

22.

The wizard falls splash into the lake.

ONOMATOPOEIA

23.

Aladdin comes straight out from behind the waterfall.

[DEG [TRAJECT]]

24.

He flies straight back across to the rock.

[DEG [FLOW]]

25.

He flies right back into the desert.

[DEG [FLOW]]

26.

Aladdin touches the lamp. The genie appears!

FILLER

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stringer, D. (2013). Modifying the Teaching of Modifiers: A Lesson from Universal Grammar. In: Whong, M., Gil, KH., Marsden, H. (eds) Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom. Educational Linguistics, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics