Advertisement

Verb Movement in Generative SLA and the Teaching of Word Order Patterns

  • Tom RankinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 16)

Abstract

This chapter looks at basic word order, providing an overview of generative accounts of differences in word order between German, French, and English. It reviews GenSLA studies that investigate English word order in learners with German-type or French-type first languages and that show how the word order properties from one’s native language can lead to difficulties in acquisition in the second language. On this basis, it is argued that word order is an area which should be explicitly taught and advocates development of grammatical enquiry skills in learners, through a grammaring approach to teaching.

Keywords

Word Order Target Language Explicit Instruction Negative Evidence Grammaticality Judgment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ayoun, D. 2003. Parameter-setting in language acquisition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. Ayoun, D. 2005. Verb movement in Spanish: “Mixed languages” and bilingualism. In Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on bilingualism, ed. J. Cohen, K.T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, and J. MacSwan, 143–162. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bohnacker, U. 2006. When Swedes begin to learn German: From V2 to V2. Second Language Research 22(4): 443–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohnacker, U. 2007. On the ‘vulnerability’ of syntactic domains in Swedish and German. Language Acquisition 14(1): 31–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Celce-Murcia, M. 1991. Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 25(3): 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Celce-Murcia, M., and D. Larsen-Freeman. 1998. The grammar book. An ESL/EFL teacher’s course. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  7. Chu, W., and B. Schwartz. 2005. Another look at ‘verb raising’ in the L2 English of Chinese speakers. In Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference GASLA 2004, ed. L. Dekydtspotter et al., 66–85. Sommerville: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
  8. Delfitto, D. 2005. Adverb classes and adverb placement. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 1, ed. M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, 83–120. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. den Besten, H. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In On the formal syntax of the Westgermania, ed. W. Abraham, 47–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  10. Ellis, R. 2002. Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 223–236.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, N.C. 2005. At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 305–352.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, R. 2006. Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly 40(1): 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eubank, L., J. Bischof, A. Huffstutler, P. Leek, and C. West. 1997. ‘Tom eats slowly cooked eggs’: Thematic verb raising in L2 knowledge. Language Acquisition 6: 171–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grüter, T. 2006. Another take on the L2 initial state: Evidence from comprehension in L2 German. Language Acquisition 13(4): 287–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haider, H. 2010. The syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hawkins, R., R. Towell, and N. Bazergui. 1993. Universal Grammar and the acquisition of French verb movement by native speakers of English. Second Language Research 9(3): 189–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herschensohn, J. 1998. Minimally raising the verb issue. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual Boston University conference on language development, ed. A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, H. Littlefield, and H. Walsh, 325–336. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  18. Krashen, S., and T. Terrell. 1983. The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  19. Lardiere, D. 2009. Further thoughts on parameters and features in second language acquisition: A reply to peer comments. Second Language Research 25(3): 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larsen-Freeman, D. 1991. Teaching grammar. In Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 3rd ed, ed. M. Celcia-Murcia, 279–296. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  21. Larsen-Freeman, D. 2003. Teaching language. From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  22. Lightfoot, D., and N. Hornstein. 1994. Verb movement: An introduction. In Verb movement, ed. D. Lightfoot and N. Hornstein, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacWhinney, B. 1997. Implicit and explicit processes – Commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9(2): 277–281.Google Scholar
  24. Norris, J., and L. Ortega. 2000. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50(3): 417–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
  26. Robertson, D., and A. Sorace. 1999. Losing the V2 constraint. In The development of second language grammars: A generative approach, ed. E. Klein and G. Martohardjono, 317–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  27. Schwartz, B., and M. Gubala-Ryzak. 1992. Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: Against negative evidence causing the unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research 8: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwartz, B., and R. Sprouse. 1994. Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of L1 Turkish-L2 German interlanguage. In Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, ed. T. Hoekstra and B. Schwartz, 317–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  29. Schwartz, B., and R. Sprouse. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12(1): 40–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spada, N., and Y. Tomita. 2010. Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60(2): 263–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Swan, M. 2006. Does grammar teaching work? Modern English Teacher 15(2): 5–13.Google Scholar
  32. Trahey, M., and L. White. 1993. Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Second Language Research 12: 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Westergaard, Marit. 2003. Unlearning V2: Transfer, markedness and the importance of input cues in the acquisition of word order in English by Norwegian children. In EUROSLA yearbook, vol. 3, ed. S.H. Foster-Cohen and S. Pekarek Doehler, 77–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  34. White, L. 1990/1991. The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 1: 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. White, L. 1991. Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7: 133–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. White, Lydia. 1992. Long and short verb movement in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37: 273–286.Google Scholar
  37. White, Lydia. 2003. Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. White, L., N. Spada, P. Lightbrown, and L. Ranta. 1991. Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics 12(4): 416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yuan, B. 2001. The status of thematic verbs in the second language acquisition of Chinese: Against inevitability of thematic-verb raising in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17: 248–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zobl, H. 1995. Converging evidence for the ‘acquisition-learning’ distinction. Applied Linguistics 16(1): 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English Business CommunicationVienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations