Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1639 Accesses

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 10))

Abstract

This book contributes to and enhances recent efforts to meaningfully integrate social justice into engineering education. The book’s two constituent elements—engineering and social justice—are very much about hope. Separately, the fields of engineering and social justice are about hope because those of us who enact, teach and/or benefit from them hope that their manifestations in the world, in the form of technologies or social policies, will bring some kind of social good and make the world a more compassionate, just place. Yet these two fields of practice and sources of hope have rarely come together, let alone become integrated. When they come together, it is often via clashing organizational, pedagogical, practical or technical manifestations, which often end in exacerbated social inequalities and injustices. So how might engineering educators, students and practitioners begin integrating these two fields of practice in the classroom, the lab, in fieldwork, in conferences, and other spaces of scholarly and pedagogical activity, in a way that results in more just technologies?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I am in debt to philosopher Martha Nussbaum for reminding us that social justice practices, like other forms of human and social development, should be, after all, about the development of human capabilities (Nussbaum 2011).

References

  • Advisory Group for the Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society; National Academy of Engineering. (2010). Engineering, social justice, and sustainable community development: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, W., Hunt, J. A., & Quinn, T. (1998). Teaching for social justice: A democracy and education reader. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie, C., Feinblatt, E., Thamae, T., & Berrington. E. (2010). Needs and feasibility: A guide for engineers in community projects. The case of waste for life. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie, C., Pawley, A., & Riley, D. (2012). Engineering and social justice: In the university and beyond. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press. http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/titles/format/9781557536068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (2005). Why social justice matters. Cambridge/Malden: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielefeldt, A. R., Kurtis, G. P., & Christopher, W. S. (2010). Measuring the value added from service learning in project-based engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 535–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, J. (2007). Make engineering a liberal art with social relevance, report suggests. The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 14, sec. Faculty. http://chronicle.com/article/Make-Engineering-a-Socially/326

  • Brooks, T. (2008). The global justice reader. Oxford: Blackwell Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, M., Kershner, H., Schindler, K., Alphonce, C., & Braswell, J. (2004). Benefits of using socially-relevant projects in computer science and engineering education. SIGCSE Bull, 36(1), 482–486. doi:10.1145/1028174.971463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1–24. doi:10.1080/19378629.2010.545065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. (1983). More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, R. (2010). Opening remarks, APPE 2010. Online Ethics Center for Engineering. www.onlineethics.org/Topics/Enviro/EnviroResources/APPE2010/23243.aspx

  • Johnston, J. S., Shaman, S., & Zemsky, R. (1988). Unfinished design: The humanities and social sciences in undergraduate engineering education. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydens, J. A., & Lucena, J. C. (2009). Knowledge valuation in humanitarian engineering education. In S. Christensen, B. Delahousse, & M. Meganck (Eds.), Engineering in context. Aarhus: Academica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydens, J. A., Lucena, J. C., & Schneider, J. (2012). Are engineering and social justice (in)commensurable? A theoretical exploration of macro-sociological frameworks. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, 1(1), 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, M. a. O. (2006). Service learning: Engineering in your community. St. Louis: Great Lakes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucena, J. (2005). Defending the nation: US policymaking in science and engineering education from sputnik to the War against terrorism. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucena, J., Delborne, J. A., Leydens, J. A., Munakata-Marr, J., Johnson, K., & Schneider, J. (2011). Integration of climate change in the analysis and design of engineered systems: Barriers and opportunities for engineering education. In Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition. Denver: ASME Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, L. (2012). Community colleges, engineering a, and social justice. In Engineering and social justice: University and beyond. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, W. B. (2007). The trouble with diversity: How we learned to love identity and ignore inequality. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. F. (1986). Forces of production: A social history of industrial automation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, T., & Seely, B. (1993). Striving for balance: A hundred years of the American Society for Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 82(3), 136–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. (2008). Engineering and social justice. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, P. S. (2003). Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. (2010). Engineering and the values of social justice. Engineering Studies, 2(1), 1–4. doi:10.1080/19378621003615975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J., Lucena, J. C., & Leydens, J. A. (2009). Engineering to help: The value of critique in engineering service. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 28(4), 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaton, A. E. (2010). Race, rigor, and selectivity in U.S. engineering: The history of an occupational color line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalter-Roth, R., Fortenberry, N., & Lovitts, B. (2007). The acceptance and diffusion of innovation: A cross-disciplinary approach to instructional and curricular change in engineering. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschler, L. (2010). Why engineers shouldn’t worry about social justice. http://machinedesign.com/article/leland-teschlers-editorial-why-engineers-shouldn-t-worry-about-social-justice-0909

  • Tsang, E. (2000). Projects that matter: Concepts and models for service-learning in engineering. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. University Park: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisnioski, M. (2012). Engineers for change: Competing visions of technology in 1960s America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Lucena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lucena, J. (2013). Introduction. In: Lucena, J. (eds) Engineering Education for Social Justice. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics