Skip to main content

Agricultural Contracting and Agrifood Competition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ethics and Economics of Agrifood Competition

Abstract

The industrialization of agriculture is associated with tighter supply chains where vertical coordination between farmers and processors is facilitated by the use of agricultural contracts. An overview is provided on the recent trends in the use and structure of agricultural contracts followed by an examination of how the competition among processors may affect agricultural contracts. Many reasons exist for using agricultural contracts, including improved risk management and reduced transaction cost. On the other hand, the growing use of agricultural contracts and processor concentration raises concerns that processors may exercise market power, for example by offering lower contract prices in absence of local competition. Previous studies using the new empirical industrial organization models show that processing industries are not perfectly competitive but the price distortions are very small. The focus here is on examining price competition from a farmer’s instead of an industry’s point of view. Recent studies using farm-level data that show that the absence of other contractors or spot markets in producers’ areas does not lead to statistically significant price differences in agricultural contracts for most commodities. These findings provide evidence that most agricultural processors do not exercise market power by reducing prices when other local buyers are not available. Therefore, the recent trends of industrialization and increased vertical coordination in agriculture are likely occurring for reasons other than processors exercising market power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearn, M.C., P. Korb, and D. Banker. 2005. The industrialization and contracting of agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37: 347–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D.W., and D. Lueck. 1995. Risk preferences and the economics of contracts. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 85: 447–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D.W., and D. Lueck. 1998. The nature of the farm. Journal of Law and Economics 66: 343–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C.G., and J.M. Gillespie. 2007. Factors affecting the selection of business arrangements by U.S. hog farmers. Review of Agricultural Economics 29: 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B.K., and T.C. Schroeder. 1994. Human capital, producer education programs, and the adoption of forward-pricing methods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 936–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, J., R. Heifner, K. Coble, J. Perry, and A. Somwaru. 1999. Managing risk in farming: Concepts, research, and analysis. Agricultural economic report 774. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueth, B., E. Ligon, and C. Dimitri. 2007. Agricultural contracts: Data and research needs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89: 1276–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katchova, A.L. 2010a. Agricultural contracts and alternative marketing options: A matching analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 42: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katchova, A.L. 2010b. Agricultural cooperatives and contract price competitiveness. Journal of Cooperatives 24: 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katchova, A.L., and M.J. Miranda. 2004. Two-step econometric estimation of farm characteristics affecting marketing contract decisions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 88–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key, N. 2004. Agricultural contracting and the scale of production. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33: 255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, N. 2005. How much do farmers value their independence? Agricultural Economics 22: 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, J., and P. Korb. 2011. Agricultural contracting update: Contracts in 2008. Economic information bulletin no. 72. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, J., J. Perry, M. Ahearn, D. Banker, W. Chambers, C. Dimitri, N. Key, K. Nelson, and L. Southard. 2004. Contracts, markets, and prices: Organizing the production and use of agricultural commodities. Agricultural economic report number 837. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musser, W.N., G.F. Patrick, and D.T. Eckman. 1996. Risk and grain marketing behavior of large-scale farmers. Review of Agricultural Economics 18: 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, N.D., A.L. Katchova, and S.H. Lence. 2010. An empirical analysis of the determinants of marketing contract structures for corn and soybeans. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 8(4): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartwelle, J., D. O’Brien, W. Tierney Jr., and T. Eggers. 2000. The effect of personal and farm characteristics upon grain marketing practices. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 32: 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, R.J. 2000. Industrialization and consolidation in the U.S. Food Sector: Implication for competition and welfare. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 1087–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykuta, M.E., and M.L. Cook. 2001. A new institutional economics approach to contracts and cooperatives. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83: 1273–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., and E.C. Jaenicke. 2006. Simulating the impacts of contract supplies in a spot market-contract market equilibrium. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 1062–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C. 2005. Beef Packers’ captive supplies: An upward trend? A pricing edge? Choices 20: 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, T., and R.J. Sexton. 2004. The competitive implications of top-of-the-market and related contract-pricing clauses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 124–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., and R.J. Sexton. 2000. Captive supplies and the cash market price: A spatial markets approach. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 25: 88–108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ani L. Katchova Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Katchova, A.L. (2013). Agricultural Contracting and Agrifood Competition. In: James, Jr., H. (eds) The Ethics and Economics of Agrifood Competition. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6274-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics