Abstract
Traditionally, eco-design has been steered by an implicit hierarchy of preferences with respect to the end-of-life options for products of which the total life cycle impact is to be minimised. In this context, life time extension is typically preferred over disassembly for reuse of components, which in its turn is preferred over material recycling. However, this priority hierarchy is often too simplistic to accept it as a general applicable guideline: both ecological and economic considerations can make life time extension and/or the reuse of components non-favourable strategies in cases where product performance and resource efficiency may evolve rapidly as a result of continuous innovation. Furthermore, where ecological indicators might confirm the suitability of a life time extension strategy at component level, economic constraints often make such scenarios infeasible. De facto today few disassembly activities prove to be economically viable. However, the emergence of new technologies and business models could indicate a reversal of the trend to abandon the higher priority end-of-life treatment methods for manufactured goods. Based on extensive, case study driven research, successful business models were revealed that improve the economic viability of systematic product reuse, refurbishment or disassembly in function of component reuse. Where material recycling proves to be the only realistic scenario, newly emerging self-disassembly techniques could help to improve the feasibility of pure material fraction separation before shredding is applied.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Or importer/retailer.
- 2.
A minimal score corresponds to responsibility for EOL processing only, while the maximum score is allocated for operators owning the product during the use phase.
References
Azar, J. (2001). Waste free: Remanufacturing. In P. Allen (Ed.), Xerox: Environmental leadership program. Metaphors for change: partnerships, tools and civic action for sustainability. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Devoldere, T., Willems, B., Duflou, J. R., & Dewulf, W. (2009). The Eco-efficiency of reuse centres critically explored—the washing machine case. The International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing, 1(3), 265–285.
Dewulf, W., & Duflou, J. R. (2004). The environmentally optimised lifetime: A crucial concept in life cycle engineering. Proceedings Global Conference on Sustainable Product Development and Life Cycle Engineering, Berlin, Uni Edition (pp. 59–62). ISBN 3-937151-21-4.
Dewulf, W., Willems, B., Vrients, T., Sun, Y., & Duflou, J. R. (2005). The eco-efficiency of reuse centres critically explored—the refrigerator case. Proceedings of the 10th European Round Table on Sustainable and Cleaner Production, Antwerp.
Dewulf, W., Willems, B., & Duflou, J. R. (2009). Experimental validation of optimized pressure based active fasteners. Proceedings of the 16th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Cairo ( pp. 195–199) ISBN 978-0-9783187-3-4.
Duflou, J. R., Willems, B., & Dewulf, W. (2005). Towards self-disassembling products: Design solutions for economically feasible large-scale disassembly. Proceedings of the 12th CIRP International Life Cycle Engineering Seminar, Grenoble.
Duflou, J., Dewulf, W., & Devoldere, T. (2006). Methodology to support eco-efficient life extension decisions. Proceedings of the 4th Global Conference on Sustainable Product Development and Life Cycle Engineering, GCSM2006, Sao Carlos. Sao Paulo, Brazil. ISBN 85-98156-25-6.
Duflou, J. R., Seliger, G., Kara, S., Umeda, Y., Ometto, A., & Willems, B. (2008). Efficiency and feasibility of product disassembly: A case based study. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, 57/2, 583–600.
European Parliament and Council. (2003). Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), Brussels.
European Parliament and Council. (2012). Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), Brussels.
Giutini, R., & Gaudette, K. (2003). Remanufacturing: The next great opportunity for boosting US productivity. Business Horizons, 46(6), 41–48.
Hauser, W.M., & Lund, R.T. (2003). The Remanufacturing Industry: Anatomy of a Giant, Report, Boston University.
Ishii, K. (1998). Design for remanufacturing and recycling: overview of research in the United States. CIRP 5th Life Cycle Engineering Seminar, Stockholm.
Kerr, W., & Ryan, C. (2001). Eco-efficiency gains from remanufacturing: A case study of photocopier remanufacturing at Fuji Xerox Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(1), 75–81.
Lansink, A. G. W. J (1980). Dutch Parliament, Meeting year 1979–1980. Motion Lansink, Nr, 21, 15–800.
Lifset, R., & Lindhqvist, T. (2008). Producer responsibility at a turning point? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(2), 144–147.
Lund, R. (1996). The remanufacturing industry: Hidden giant. Boston, MA: Boston University.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.
Mont, O. K. (2002). Clarifying the concept of product-service system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(3), 237–245.
OECD. (1982). Product durability and product-life extension. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Sander, K., Agnes, B., Zangl, S., & Bartnik, S. (2004). Ermittlung von Verwertungskoeffizienten für die Fraktionen und Bauteile zur Dokumentation von Quoten auf der Basis von Artikel 7 der EU-Richtlinie zur Verwertung von Elektrogeräten (WEEE). http://www.umweltbundesamt.de
Sundin, E. (2007). Design for integrated product-service offerings: A case study of soil compactors. In S. Takata & Y. Umeda (Eds.), Advances in life cycle engineering for sustainable manufacturing businesses (pp. 149–154). London: Springer.
Sundin, E. (2009). Life-cycle perspectives of product/service-systems: Practical design experiences. In T. Sakao & M. Lindahl (Eds.), Introduction to product/service-system design (pp. 51–70). London: Springer-Verlag Limited.
Thierry, M. C., Salomon, M., van Nunen, J. A. E. E., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (1995). Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Review, 37(2), 114–135.
Willems, B., Dewulf, W., & Duflou, J. (2004). End-of-life strategy selection: A linear programming approach to manage innovations in product design. International Journal of Production Engineering and Computers, 6/7, 45–54. YU ISSN 1450-5096.
Willems, B., Dewulf, W., & Duflou, J. (2006). Can large-scale disassembly be profitable? A linear programming approach to quantifying the turning point to make disassembly economically viable. International Journal of Production Research, 44(6), 1125–1146.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duflou, J.R., Van Ostaeyen, J., Dewulf, W. (2013). Second Thoughts on Preferred End-of-Life Treatment Strategies for Consumer Products. In: Jawahir, I., Sikdar, S., Huang, Y. (eds) Treatise on Sustainability Science and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6229-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6229-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6228-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6229-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)