Abstract
Throughout the world, nations are seeking ways to decrease CO2 emissions and to reduce their dependency on fossil fuels, especially oil, for environmental as well as geopolitical reasons. Being a renewable, CO2-reducing and easily storable energy carrier, biomass is a priority resource for fossil fuel substitution, and biomass is increasingly used for both the transport and the heat and power sectors, with increasing interest in using it for chemicals production as well. For the transport sector, the conversion of biomass to the liquid biofuels of bio-diesel and bioethanol is at present a technological pathway promoted by governments in many countries. With the increasing interest in our biomass resource, however, the issue of competition for the biomass and the need for prioritising it has become evident. For several decades ahead, we still depend heavily on fossil fuels, and we can only replace them to the extent and with the speed that alternatives become available. As the magnitude of biomass that is or can be made available for energy purposes is small compared to the magnitude of the new potential customers for it, any long-term and large-scale prioritisation of biomass for one purpose will imply a loss of alternative uses of the same biomass. If the lost alternatives are, then, significantly more efficient as well as economically more attractive in fossil fuels substitution and CO2 reduction, we lose more than we win. It is our claim that this is the case for most liquid biofuels, including first-generation bio-diesels (plant bio-diesels) as well as first- and second-generation bioethanols produced in Europe and the USA. When we prioritise biomass for these biofuels, we deprive ourselves the better alternative of using the same limited biomass for heat and power and running our cars on the fuels saved there.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ekvall, T., & Weidema, B. P. (2004). System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9, 161–171.
FAO Statistics Division. (2007). FAO statistical yearbook 2005–2006 (Vol. 1/2, issue 1). Web Edition.
Fritsche, U., Dehoust, G., Jenseit, F., Hünecke, K., Rausch, L., Schüler, D., et al. (2004). Stoffstromanalyse zur nachhaltigen energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse (Material flow analysis of sustainable biomass use for energy). Final report. Öko-Institut, Darmstadt, Germany 2004. Commissioned by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Berlin.
Hedegaard, K., Thyø, K. A., & Wenzel, H. (2008). Life cycle assessment of an advanced bioethanol technology in the perspective of constrained biomass availability. Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 7992–7999.
IEA. (2007). Potential contribution of bioenergy to the world’s future energy demand. IEA Bioenergy, ExCo:2007:02.
Jensen, K., Thyø, K. A. & Wenzel, H. (2007). Life cycle assessment of bio-diesel from animal fat. Report for Daka amba, Institute for Product Development. Retrieved April 30, 2007 from http://www.dakabiodiesel.dk/lib/files.asp?ID=518.
Jensen, K. H., & Thyø, K. A. (2007). 2nd generation bioethanol for transport: The IBUS concept—boundary conditions and environmental assessment. Master thesis, Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Management, Technical University of Denmark. Retrieved February 19, 2007 from www.ipl.dtu.dk/2gbioethanol.
Kaltschmitt, M., & Reinhardt, G. A. (1997). Nachwachsende Energieträger: Grundlagen, Verfahren, ökologische Bilanzierung (Biofuels: Basics, procedures, ecological assessment; in German). Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, Germany: Vieweg.
Nakicenovic, N., Grübler, A., & McDonald, A. (1998). Global energy perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nielsen, P., & Wenzel, H. (2005). Environmental assessment of ethanol produced from corn starch and used as an alternative to conventional gasoline for car driving. The Institute for Product Development, the Technical University of Denmark. Retrieved June 2005 from http://www.ipu.dk/IPU-Produktion/Publikationer/bio-ethanol-report,-d-,pdf.aspx.
Nielsen, P., Dalgaard, R., Korsbak, A., & Pettersson, D. (2008). Environmental assessment of digestibility improvement factors applied in animal production: Use of Ronozyme® WX CT Xylanase in Danish pig production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(1), 49–56.
Nitsch, J., Krewitt, W., Nast, M., Viebahn, P., Gärtner, S., Pehnt, M., et al. (2004). Ökologisch optimierter Ausbau der Nutzung erneuerbarer Energien in Deutschland (Ecologically optimized extension of renewable energy utilization in Germany). Final report, DLR Stuttgart, Germany 2004. Commissioned by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Natural Protection, and Reactor Safety, Berlin.
Patel, M., Crank, M., Dornburg, V., Hermann, B., Roes, L., Hüsing, B., et al. (2006). Medium- and long-term opportunities and risks of the biotechnological production of bulk chemicals from renewable resources—the potential of white biotechnology. The BREW-Project. Final Report. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. http://www.chem.uu.nl/brew/BREW_Final_Report_September_2006.pdf.
Quirin, M., Reinhardt, G. A., Gärtner, S., & Pehnt, M. (2004). CO2-neutrale Wege zukünftiger Mobilität durch Biokraftstoffe: Eine Bestandsaufnahme (CO2 mitigation through biofuels in the transport sector. Status and perspectives). Germany: IFEU, Frankfurt am Main.
Ramankutty, N., Foley, J. A., Norman, J., & McSweeney, K. (2002). The global distribution of cultivable land: Current patterns and sensitivity to possible climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 377–392.
Reinhardt, G. A., Detzel, A., Gärtner, S., Rettenmaier, N., & Krüger, M. (2007). Nachwachsende Rohstoffe für die chemische Industrie: Optionen und Potenziale für die Zukunft (Renewable resources for the chemical industry: Options and potentials for the future). Germany: IFEU, Frankfurt am Main.
Righelato, R., & Spracklen, D. V. (2007). Carbon mitigation by biofuels or by saving and restoring forests? Science, 317(5840), 902.
Thyø, K. A., & Wenzel, H. (2007). Life cycle assessment of biogas from maize silage and from manure—for transport and for heat and power production under displacement of natural gas based heat works and marginal electricity in northern Germany. Report for Xergi A/S, Institute for Product Development. Retrieved June 21, 2007 from http://www.xergi.com/media/lca.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wenzel, H., Hedegaard, K., Thyø, K., Reinhardt, G. (2013). Liquid Biofuels: We Lose More Than We Win. In: Jawahir, I., Sikdar, S., Huang, Y. (eds) Treatise on Sustainability Science and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6229-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6229-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6228-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6229-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)