Skip to main content

Severance of a Traditional Grazing Landscape in the Himalayas: Commons and Ecosystems in Crisis?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Severance and the Environment

Part of the book series: Environmental History ((ENVHIS,volume 2))

Abstract

Nestled in the north-west Himalayas has survived a cultural landscape. Though severely fractured, this is an ancient tradition of pasturing sheep on the grazing dhars, not unlike the Swiss alps (Lyall 1865) and soanas or grazing runs for cattle, which are in the nature of commons. Contrary to the Hardinian perception of shepherds over-grazing a hillside which is a common property resource, the protagonists of this story—both shepherds and herders—have averted a tragedy of the commons. This has been by adopting “physical mobility to change location” (Scott 2009) not because they are fugitives of a stateless society as in nearby Zomia (which Scott describes), but have rather made it possible for sedentary cultivators to co-survive in extremely isolated locations.

It will be sufficient to speak of original property in land, for among pastoral peoples… In general, property in land includes property in its organic products. (Karl Marx 1857–1858).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Batten (1856–1864).

  2. 2.

    Hutchison and Vogel (1933, p. 274) in fn by Vogel. The Gaddis have castes such as Brahman, Rajput and Khatris and they returned themselves in the census under these caste names and not as gaddis. They are principally in the Brahmour Wazarat which is called Gadaran.

  3. 3.

    J.M. Douie, District Collector, Karnal to Commissioner and Superintendent.

  4. 4.

    Shamilat meant common land belonging to the entire village proprietary body of the individual villages. This was distinct from the open access forests.

  5. 5.

    Gujars and Gaddis were pastoral tribes in the main but they were not always nomadic.

  6. 6.

    Una, Hoshiarpur Settlement Report 1876. para 103.

  7. 7.

    Ibid, para 108.

  8. 8.

    Lowis’ reply to questions asked by Rai Bahadur Shyam Sunder Lal, Famine Inquiry Report 1901, p. 306.

  9. 9.

    Shahpur Kandi Tract, Gurdaspur Settlement Report 1877 p. 15.

  10. 10.

    Gurdaspur Settlement Report (1912, p. 100).

  11. 11.

    The iqrarnamas (statement of rights) frequently differ greatly on important points. For example “… the unmeasured waste in one is not declared to be shamilat or joint property of the landholders, and a literal rendering of the text would limit their proprietary right to the measured rights only; in another no mention is made of the right of Government to the timber of trees on waste lands etc.” Kangra Settlement Report 1865–1872, p. 29.

  12. 12.

    Board of Administration's circular No. 15 of 1852, prescribing the steps to be taken to encourage plantations and conservancy, Circular Order issued by the Board of Administration in the Revenue Department during the years 1849–1853, Manual for Arboriculture, 1905, para 3.

  13. 13.

    Edmonstone in his letter No. 2554 of Nov 9, 1853, para 12, “It may be encouraging to the local officers to know that in the Simla Hills this revolution has within the last year or two actually effected… and joint responsibility fully recognised and established." Jhang Settlement Report, 1860, para 12.

  14. 14.

    P.S. Melvill, Commissioner and Superintendent, Trans-Sutlej States, to District Collector Hoshiarpur, 1/3/1860, Revenue and Agriculture (forests), Proceedings 3-5 B, October 1887.

  15. 15.

    Revenue and Agriculture (Famines) Proceedings 3-4 A, September 1885, p. 324.

  16. 16.

    Punjab Gazette, 1907, Notification No. 179 for the Rawalpindi Forests.

  17. 17.

    C.F. Amery, at the Advance Conference on forestry in Simla, 1875.

  18. 18.

    C.A. Roe, Settlement Officer Hoshiarpur to Commissioner and Superintendent, Jalandhar Division, 13/11/1872. Agriculture and Revenue (Forests), Proceedings 3–5 B, Oct. 1887, para 18.

  19. 19.

    Report of the Royal Commission on Agriculture in India (1927, p. 683).

  20. 20.

    Conservator of Forests, Punjab to Officiating Secretary Government Punjab, 4/12/1876, Revenue, Agriculture and Commerce, Government of India, Proceedings 1–3 A, March 1878.

Abbreviations

Gaz:

Gazeteer

PAR:

Punjab Administration Report

PBEI:

Punjab Board of Economic Inquiry

Progs:

Proceedings

SR:

Settlement Report

References

  • Barnes GC (1849–1852) Kangra settlement report

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten JH (1856–1864) Garhwal District settlement report. p 49

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert H (ed) (1933) Punjab Board of Economic Inquiry, An Economic Survey of Haripur and Mangarh Taluqas

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier EH (1932) Water and Grass. Christophers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty-Kaul M (1996) Common lands and Customary Law. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, Institutional Change in Northern India in the past Two Centuries

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty-Kaul M (1999) Market success or community failure? common property resources in colonial north india and a case illustration from a cluster. Indian Econ Soc Hist Rev 36(3):356–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty-Kaul M (2000) Risk uncertainty and collective action on the mountain forest. Lecture at University of Trento

    Google Scholar 

  • Diack AH (1898) Final report on the settlement of the Kulu Sub-Division of the Kangra District

    Google Scholar 

  • Famine Inquiry Report 1901

    Google Scholar 

  • Famine report (1880)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurdaspur Gazeteer (1914)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurdaspur settlement report (1912)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshiarpur settlement report (1885)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison J, Vogel JP (1933) History of the Panjab Hill States. Government Printing, Lahore. I

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyall JB (1865–1872) Report of the Land Revenue Settlement of the Kangra District, Panjab

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1857–1858) Pre-Capitalist Economic Formations

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamourex J, Da Fonseca GAB (2004) Hotspots Revisited. Cemex, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Punjab Administration Report (1919–1920)

    Google Scholar 

  • Punjab Board of Economic Inquiry (1933) An Economic Survey of the taluqas of Haripur and Mangarh of the Kangra District

    Google Scholar 

  • Punjab Census (1881)

    Google Scholar 

  • Report on the Administration of the Punjab (1909–1910)

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Royal Commission on Agriculture in India (1927). VIII p. 683

    Google Scholar 

  • Revenue and Agriculture Forest Proceedings (1887)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J (2009) The art of not being Governed. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, History of Upland South East Asia

    Google Scholar 

  • Spate OHK (1963) India and Pakistan. A general and regional Geography. Methuen and Company Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Siba Jagir Settlement Report (1881–1882)

    Google Scholar 

  • Una Tehsil Settlement Report (1914)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel JP (1911) Antiquities of Chamba State, part I: inscriptions of the pre-muhammadan period. Superintendent Government Printing, Calcutta

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minoti Chakravarty-Kaul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chakravarty-Kaul, M. (2013). Severance of a Traditional Grazing Landscape in the Himalayas: Commons and Ecosystems in Crisis?. In: Rotherham, I. (eds) Cultural Severance and the Environment. Environmental History, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6159-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics