Social Morphogenesis pp 39-60 | Cite as
The Morphogenetic Approach and the Idea of a Morphogenetic Society: The Role of Regularities
- 2 Citations
- 1 Mentions
- 947 Downloads
Abstract
This chapter addresses the systematic significance of the idea of a morphogenetic society (MS), the questions it raises and the implications it has for the explanatory morphogenetic approach. The general thesis is that further articulation of the morphogenetic conceptual framework appears to be connected with the representation of society it offers, the relation being one of reciprocity. More precisely, it is argued that the idea of MS could stimulate theoretical work at the borders of the morphogenetic approach, to consolidate, expand, and face challenges to it. Specifically, the conceptualization of emergence, particularly of what can be called ‘emergence of the new’, raises issues related to abrupt (i.e., catastrophic) versus gradual change and profound versus superficial change. This chapter then focusses upon the issue of regularity, arguing that the idea of a MS entails a further articulation of the morphogenetic approach that involves a reconsideration of the concept of (social) regularity. Finally, it is also maintained that the morphogenetic approach allows for an original representation of global society, based on a non-functionalistic, non-evolutionistic, non-teleological conceptual framework, and provides a fully processual conceptualization of social order.
Keywords
Morphogenetic society (MS) Idea of a Morphogenetic society Emergence of the new Profound versus superficial change Concept of Social RegularityReferences
- Abbott A (1983) Sequences of social events: concepts and methods in the analysis of order in social processes. Hist Methods 16:129–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Abbott A (1984) Event sequence and event duration: colligation and measurement. Hist Methods 17:192–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Abbott A (2001) Time matters: On theory and method. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and LondonGoogle Scholar
- Abbott A (2006) The concept of order in the processual sociology. Cahiers Parisiens, 315–345Google Scholar
- Alexander JC (1994) Modern, anti, post, and neo: how social theories have tried to understand the “New World” of “Our Time”. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 23(3):165–197Google Scholar
- Aminzade R (1992) Historical sociology and time. Soc Method Res 20(4):456–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Aminzade R, Larson E (2009) Nation-building in post-colonial nation-states: the cases of Tanzania and the Fiji. Int Soc Sci J 192:169–182Google Scholar
- Andersen H (2011) Mechanisms, laws, and regularities. Philos Sci 78(2):325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Andersen H (2012) (forthcoming) The case for regularity in mechanistic causal explanation. Synthese 189 (3):415–432 Google Scholar
- Archer MS (1988) Culture and Agency. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Archer MS (1995) Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Archer MS (2007) Making our way through the world: human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Archer MS (2011a) Morphogenesis: realism’s explanatory framework. In: Maccarini A, Morandi E, Prandini R (eds), Sociological Realism. Routledge, London and New York, pp 59–94Google Scholar
- Archer MS (2011b) The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Arnason JP, Wittrock B (eds) (2004) Eurasian transformations, 10th to 13th centuries: crystallizations, divergences, renaissances. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
- Arnason JP, Eisenstadt SN, Wittrock B (eds) (2004) Axial civilizations and world history. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
- Brown C (1993) Nonlinear transformation in a landslide: Johnson and goldwater in 1964. Am J Political Sci 37(2):582–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coleman JS (1970) Social inventions. Soc Forces 49:163–173Google Scholar
- Dépelteau F (2008) Relational thinking: a critique of co-deterministic theories of structure and agency. Sociol Theory 26(1):51–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eberts PR, Witton RA (1970) Recall from anecdote: Alexis de Tocqueville and the morphogenesis of America. Am Sociol Rev 35(6):1081–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Hedström P (2005) Dissecting the social: On the principles of analytical sociology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holt RT, Job BL, Markus L (1978) Catastrophe theory and the study of war. J Confl Resolut 22(2):171–208Google Scholar
- Joas H, Knöbl W (2009) Social theory: twenty introductory lectures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Jobe EK (1985) Explanation, causality, and counterfactuals. Philos Sci 52(3):357–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kauffman RG, Oliva TA (1994) Multivariate catastrophe model estimation: method and application. Acad Manag J 37(1):206–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kemp S, Holmwood J (2003) Realism, regularity and social explanation. J Theory Soc Behav 33(2):165–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knöbl W (2007) Die Kontingenz der Moderne. Wege in Europa, Asien und Amerika. Frankfurt/New York, Campus VerlagGoogle Scholar
- Lauer RH (1981) Temporal man: the meaning and uses of social time. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- Luhmann N (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
- Luhmann N, De Giorgi R (1994) Teoria della società. Franco Angeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
- Maccarini A (2011). Toward a new European sociology: The morphogenetic approach between social analysis and grand theory. In: Maccarini A, Morandi E, Prandini R (eds), Sociological realism, Routledge, London and New York, pp 95–121Google Scholar
- Maccarini A, Morandi E, Prandini R (eds) (2011) Sociological realism. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Maruyama M (1976) Toward cultural symbiosis. In: Jantsch E, Waddington C (eds) Evolution and consciousness: human systems in transition. Addison-Wesley Reading, Mass, pp 198–213Google Scholar
- McCann JE, Selsky J (1984) Hyperturbulence and the emergence of type 5 environments. Acad Manag Rev 9(3):460–470Google Scholar
- Oliva TA, Day DL, MacMillan IC (1988) A generic model of competitive dynamics. Acad Manag Rev 13(3):374–389Google Scholar
- Parsons T (1964) Evolutionary universals in society. Am Sociol Rev 29:339–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parsons T (1966) Societies: evolutionary and comparative perspectives. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- Parsons T (1971) The system of modern societies. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- Porpora DV (2011) Recovering causality: realist methods in sociology. In: Maccarini A, Morandi E, Prandini R (eds) Sociological Realism. Routledge, London and New York, pp 149–167Google Scholar
- Porpora DV (2012) The morphogenetic approach in the social sciences. Paper presented at the Lausanne Seminar, Jan 2012Google Scholar
- Smirnov AD, Ershov EB (1992) Perestroika: a catastrophic change of economic reform policy. J Confl Resolut 36(3):415–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Steinmetz G (2005) The politics of method in the human sciences. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
- Sugden R (2011) Explanation in search of observations. Biol Philos 26(5):717–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thalos M (1999) In favor of being only humean. Philos Stud 93(3):265–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tilly C (1984) Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. Russell Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Ward M (1995) Butterflies and bifurcations: can chaos theory contribute to our understanding of family systems? J Marriage Fam 57(3):629–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar