Morphogenesis and Social Change

  • Douglas V. PorporaEmail author


As a prelude to the rest of the book, this chapter examines what morphogenesis has so far meant in sociological theory. So far, morphogenesis has been explained as a meta-theoretical rather than a theoretical concept. As such, morphogenesis does not directly explain anything. Instead, it constitutes the ineluctable framework for any theoretically effective explanation of social change. Accordingly, this chapter shows (i) how the morphogenetic approach underlies a variety of different explanations of social change and (ii) how those sociological approaches that eschew the morphogenetic approach consequently fail to account effectively for social change. The chapter ends with some questions as Archer now speculates about morphogenesis as not just a meta-theoretical concept but as also a specific societal category at the level of theory.


Morphogenesis in sociological theory Social change Morphogenetic approach Sociological approaches 


  1. Althusser L (2009) Reading capital. Verso, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Althusser L (2010) For Marx. Verso, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson P (1980) Arguments within English Marxism. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer MS (1982) Morphogenesis versus structuration: on combining structure and action. Br J Sociol 33(4):455–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archer MS (1988) Culture and agency: the place of culture in social theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Archer MS (1995) Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Archer MS (2007) Making our way through the world: human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdieu P (1993) The field of cultural production. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies B, Harré R (1990) Positioning and the discursive production of selves. J Theor Soc Behav 20(1):43–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foster JB, Magdoff F (2009) The great financial disaster: causes and consequences. Monthly Review Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Foucault M (2008) On the archaeology of the sciences: response to the epistemological circle. In: Faubion JD (ed) Aesthetics, method and epistemology: essential works of Foucault 1954–1984. New Press, New York, pp 297–334Google Scholar
  12. Friedland R, Mohr J (2004) The cultural turn in American sociology. In: Friedland R, Mohr J (eds.) Matters of culture: cultural sociology in practice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Giddens A (1979) Central problems in social theory. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  14. Giddens A (1981) A contemporary critique of historical materialism. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  16. Giddens A (1991) The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Jessop B (2006) Beyond the regulation approach: putting capitalist economies in their place. Edward Elgar, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Joas H (1997) The creativity of action. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuhn T (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  20. Lim M, Lim C (2010) Nowhere to hide: the great financial crisis and consequences for Asia. Institute for Southeast Asian Studies, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  21. Marx K (2000) The eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In: McClellan D (ed) Karl Marx: selected writings. Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Porpora D (1983) On the prospects for a nomothetic theory of social structure. J Theor Soc Behav (Special Issue) 13:243–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Porpora D (1985) The role of agency in history: the Althusser-Thompson-Anderson debate. In: McNall S (ed.) Current perspectives in social theory, vol 6. JAI Press, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  24. Porpora D (1987) The concept of social structure. Greenwood Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  25. Porpora D (1989) Four concepts of social structure. J Theor Soc Behav 19:195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Porpora D (1993) Cultural rules and material relations. Sociol Theory 11:212–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Porpora D (2011) Critical terrorism studies: a political economic approach grounded in critical realism. Crit Stud Terrorism 4(1):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rostow E (1991) The stages of growth: a non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sewell W (1992) A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. Am J Sociol 98:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Small ML, Harding DJ, Lamont M (2010) Reconsidering culture and poverty. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 629(6):6–27Google Scholar
  31. Thompson EP (1978) The poverty of theory and other essays. Monthly Review Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Urry J (2003) Global complexity. Polity, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Weber M (2002) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Penguin, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson WJ (2010) Why both social structure and culture matter in a holistic analysis of inner-city poverty. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 629:200–219Google Scholar
  35. Winch P (1958) The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Culture and CommunicationDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations