Social Morphogenesis pp 1-22 | Cite as
Social Morphogenesis and the Prospects of Morphogenic Society
- 22 Citations
- 1 Mentions
- 1.1k Downloads
Abstract
The book discusses ‘social morphogenesis’ within late modernity and the potential of this process to reshape the social order. Contributors are not signatories to a manifesto for a Morphogenic Society but are willing to consider this notion given rapid global change, the current crisis and perceived inadequacies in macroscopic social theory today. The introduction undertakes four tasks. (i) Clarifying the distinction between the Morphogenetic Approach as an explanatory framework and the idea of Morphogenic Society as an inchoate theory; yet to be articulated and not yet advocated. (ii) The synergy intensifying between structure and culture, such that ‘variety generates further variety’, is suggested to foster a new ‘situational logic of Opportunity’, as opposed to the ‘situational logic of Competition’ characterising modernity. (iii) The adequacy of modelling the global system as ‘self-governing’, ‘self-organizing’, or as a ‘relationally contested organization’ is assessed. (iv) Social networks are examined not only as communicative links but also as integrative bonds because the current deficit in social integration may produce social antagonism alone rather than social transformation.
Keywords
Social morphogenesis Prospects of morphogenic society Situational logic of opportunity Modelling the global system Social networks Social transformationReferences
- Albrow M (1997) The global age: State and Society beyond modernity. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Albrow M (2002) The global shift and its consequences for sociology. Paper presented at the 13th world congress of sociology, Brisbane, 7–13 July 2002Google Scholar
- Archer MS (1979) Social origins of educational systems. Sage, London and Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
- Archer MS (1988) Culture and agency. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Archer MS (1995) Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Archer MS (2007a) Making our way through the world: human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Archer MS (2007b) Social integration, system integration and global governance. In: Rossi I (ed) Frontiers of globalization research, Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Archer MS (2012) The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Archer MS, Elder-Vass D (2012) Cultural system or norm circles? An exchange. Eur J Soc Theory 15(1):93−115Google Scholar
- Beck U, Beck-Gernsheim E (2002) Individualization. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Blau P (1964) Exchange and power in social life. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Buckley W (1967) Sociology and modern systems theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- Buckley W (1998) Society—a complex adaptive system. Gordon and Breach, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Castells M (2010, 1996) The rise of the network society, the information age, vol 1. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Davies J (2005) Mechanisms of morphogenesis: the creation of biological form. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Lockwood D (1964) Social integration and system integration. In: Zollschan GK and Hirsch W (eds) Explorations in social change, Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Maruyama M (1978) Heterogenistics and morphogenetics: toward a new concept of the scientific. Theor Soc 5(1):75–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mayuyama M (2003) Causal Loops, Interaction and Creativity. International review of sociology/revue internationale de sociologie 13(3):607–628Google Scholar
- Rossi I (ed) (2007) Frontiers of globalization research. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Stalder F (2006) Manuel castells. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Turner RH (1990) Role change. Annu Rev Sociol 16:87–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wagner HR (1964) Displacement of scope: a problem of the relationship between small-scale and large-scale social theories. Am J Sociol 36(6):571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar