Abstract
The paper discusses whether and how social and ethnic school class composition may affect students’ cognitive and non-cognitive development over time. High-performing students, who often tend to come from more privileged backgrounds, may provide opportunities for weaker students to enhance their competence development and serve as role models for behavior appropriate to the school setting. In contrast, a higher share of children with a migration background at a school or in a school class may lead teachers to lower their requirements to adapt to the level of the non-native speakers’ language skills. Moreover, a higher proportion of immigrants in a class increases children’s opportunities and incentives to use their language of origin in and around school. To test these different hypotheses, we analyze panel data on the impact of school class composition on students’ changes in cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes, namely vocabulary, numeracy, and effort. The data are derived from the BiKS project (Educational Processes, Competence Development and Selection Decisions in Preand Elementary School Age) and have been collected in two German states since 2006. The panel study provides detailed information on almost 2,400 students from over 150 classes and includes assessment tests, student’s and teacher’s questionnaires, and telephone interviews with parents. The major result is that school class composition has little to no effect if initial measures on vocabulary, numeracy or effort are taken into account. This means, that if we shift from a purely cross-sectional to a value-added model from grade 3 to 4. One exception is the negative correlation between the share of migrants in a class and the individual progress in numeracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Advantaged neighbors can also have positive effects since they can provide more information, including, for instance, about job opportunities. This has been researched in labor market studies, where weak ties are especially relevant (Granovetter 1973). In a neighborhood where almost everyone is unemployed, there is hardly anyone who can tell other people about a job or trainee position, or who can recommend a person to the head of a company (Wilson 1987). For educational careers, information on the supply and quality of different schools might also be important for the decision-making.
- 2.
A third important factor regarding the language acquisition of non-natives is efficiency, which depends mainly on intellectual capacities and age at immigration. We ignore these aspects in the discussion, as both characteristics are individual-specific and almost all of today’s elementary school children with a migration background were born in Germany or arrived in Germany before school enrolment.
- 3.
Only North Rhine-Westphalia has eliminated restriction in elementary school choice.
- 4.
BiKS is the acronym for the German title “Bildungsprozesse, Kompetenzentwicklung und Selektionsentscheidungen im Vor- und Grundschulalter”, which means in English “Educational Processes, Competence Development and Selection Decisions in Pre- and Elementary School Age”.
- 5.
Another advantage of experiments is that the range, the “strength” of the treatment effect can be administered. For e.g., in observational education studies we often have classes with no to some students with migration background, but only a few classes with (nearly) all students having this characteristic. If there are threshold effects starting at a higher proportion of students with migration background, the effects would not be discovered if the sample consists (almost) only of classes below such a threshold.
- 6.
‘Trivial’ because in the case of real cross-sectional data, regressing a student variable (level 1) on means of this variable for each school class in a hierarchical linear model results in completely explained variance at level 2. In the ‘constant only model,’ the variance at level 2 is based on the different means of the dependent variable per school class and the total average between all school classes. As students’ effort in grades 3 and 4 correlates, the aggregate measure of grade 3 should significantly correlate with students’ efforts in grade 4, too.
References
Alba, R.D, J. Handl, and W. Müller. 1998. Ethnic inequalities in the German school system. In Paths to inclusion. The integration of migrants in the United States and Germany, eds. P. Schuck, and R. Münz, 115–154. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Allison, P.D. 2001. Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ammermueller, A., and J. Pischke. 2009. Peer effects in European primary schools: Evidence from the progress in international reading literacy study. Journal of Labor Economics 27(3): 315–348.
Berendes, K, D. Fey, T. Linberg, S.E. Wenz, H. Roßbach, Schneider, Thorsten, and S. Weinert. 2011. Kindergarten and elementary school. In Education as a lifelong process—the German national educational panel study (NEPS) eds. H. Blossfeld, H. Roßbach, and J. von Maurice. (Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft; Special Issue 14) 203–216. Heidelberg: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Bernburg, J.G., T. Thorlindsson, and I.D. Sigfusdottir. 2009. Relative Deprivation and adolescent outcomes in Iceland: A mulilevel test. Social Forces 87(3): 1223–1250.
Biedinger, N, and B. Becker. 2010. Frühe ethnische Bildungsungleichheit: Der Einfluss des Kindergartenbesuchs auf die deutsche Sprachfähigkeit und die allgemeine Entwicklung. In Vom Kindergarten bis zur Hochschule. Die Generierung von ethnischen und sozialen Disparitäten in der Bildungsbiographie, eds. B. Becker, and D. Reimer. 49–79. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Brännström, L. 2008. Making their mark: The effects of neighbourhood and upper secondary school on educational achievement. European Sociological Review 24(4): 463–478.
Bygren, M., and R. Szulkin. 2010. Ethnic environment during childhood and the educational attainment of immigrant children in Sweden. Social Forces 88(3): 1305–1330.
Coleman, J.S. 1966. Equality of educational opportunity. Washington: U.S. Office of Education.
Coleman, J.S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94(Supplement): S95–S120.
Cortina, J.M. 1993. What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Psychology 78(1): 98–104.
Crane, J. 1991. The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing. The American Journal of Sociology 96(5): 1226–1259.
Ditton, H. 2010. Differentielle Leistungsentwicklung in der zweiten Hälfte der Grundschulzeit. Zeitschrift für Grundschulforschung 3(1): 83–98.
Duncan, G.J, and S. Raudenbush. (2001). Getting Context Right in Quantitative Studies of Child Development. In The Well-Being of Children and Families. Research and Data Needs, ed. A. Thornton. 356–383. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Esser, H. 2006. Sprache und Integration. Die sozialen Bedingungen und Folgen des Spracherwerbs von Migranten. New York: Frankfurt am Main Campus.
Fasang, A.E., W. Mangino, and H. Brückner. 2010. Parental social capital and educational attainment. CIQLE working paper 2010-01, New Haven: Center for Research on Inequalities and the Life Course (CIQLE). download at http://www.yale.edu/ciqle/CIQLEPAPERS/CIQLE_WP_2010_1.pdf.
Festinger, L. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2): 117–140.
Goldsmith, P.R. 2009. Schools or neighborhoods or both? Race and ethnic segregation and educational attainment. Social Forces 87(4): 1913–1942.
Gölitz, D., T. Roick, and M. Hasselhorn. 2006. DEMAT 4. Deutscher Mathematiktest für vierte Klassen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Granovetter, M.S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.
Helbig, M. 2010. Neighborhood does matter! Soziostrukturelle Nachbarschaftscharakteristika und Bildungserfolg. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 62(4): 665–679.
Kristen, C. 2002. Hauptschule, Realschule oder Gymnasium? Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 54(3): 534–552.
Kristen, C. (2008). Schulische Leistungen von Kindern aus türkischen Familien am Ende der Grundschulzeit. Befunde aus der IGLU-Studie. In Migration und Integration. 48. Sonderheft der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, ed. F. Kalter, 230–251. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Lazarsfeld, P.F., and R.K. Merton. 1954. Friendship as Social Process. In Freedom and control in modern society, ed. M. Berger, T. Abel, and C. Page, 18–66. New York: Octagon.
Leventahl, T., and J. Brooks-Gunn. 2000. The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neigborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin 126(2): 309–337.
Marsh, H.W., U. Trautwein, O. Lüdtke, and O. Köller. 2008. Social comparison and big-fish-little-pond effects on self-concept and efficacy perceptions: Role of generalized and specific others. Journal of Educational Psychology 100(3): 510–524.
Massey, D.S., and N.A. Denton. 1993. American apartheid. Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambrige (MA), London: Harvard University Press.
Mayer, S.E., and C. Jencks. 1989. Growing up in poor neighborhoods: How much does it matter? Science 243(4897): 1441–1445.
Merton, R.K., and A.S. Rossi. 1968. Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behavior. In Social theory and social structure, ed. R.K. Merton, 279–440. New York: The Free Press.
OECD eds. 2006. Where immigrant students succeed—A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003. Paris.
Portes, A., and D. MacLeod. 1996. Educational progress of children of immigrants: The roles of class, ethnicity, and school context. Sociology of Education 69(4): 255–275.
Riedel, A., K. Schneider, C. Schuchart, and H. Weishaupt. 2010. School choice in German primary schools: How binding are school districts? Journal for Educational Research Online 2(1): 94–120.
Roick, T., D. Gölitz, and M. Hasselhorn. 2004. DEMAT 3+. Deutscher Mathematiktest für dritte Klassen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Royston, P. 2009. Multiple imputation of missing values: further update of ice, with an emphasis on categorical variables. Stata Journal 9(3): 466–477.
Rubin, D.B. 1987. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
Stanat, P. 2006. Schulleistungen von Jugendlichen mit Migrationshintergrund. Die Rolle der Zusammensetzung der Schülerschaft. In Herkunftsbedingte Disparitäten im Bildungswesen. Differenzielle Bildungsprozesse und Probleme der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit, eds. J. Baumert, P. Stanat, and R. Watermann. Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000 683–743. Wiesbaden: VS.
Statistisches Bundesamt (StaBu) eds. 2009. Bildung und Kultur: Private Schulen. Fachserie 11, Reihe 1.1, Wiesbaden.
van der Slik, F.W.P., G.W.J.M. Driessen, and K.L.J. de Bot. 2006. Ethnic and socioeconomic class composition and language proficiency. A longitudinal multilevel examination in Dutch elementary schools. European Sociological Review 22(3): 293–308.
van Tubergen, F., and M. Kalmijn. 2005. Destination-language proficiency in cross-national perspective: A study of immigrant groups in nine western countries. American Journal of Sociology 110(5): 1412–1457.
von Maurice, J., C. Artelt, H. Blossfeld, G. Faust, H. Rossbach, and S. Weinert. 2007. Bildungsprozesse, Kompetenzentwicklung und Formation von Selektionsentscheidungen im Vor- und Grundschulalter: Überblick über die Erhebungen in den Längsschnitten BiKS-3-8 und BiKS-8-12 in den ersten beiden Projektjahren. PsyDok [Online] 2007/1008. psydok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2007/1008/.
Weiß, R.H. 1998. CFT 20 - Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 mit Wortschatztest (WS) und Zahlenfolgetest (ZF), 4. Aufl. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Wilson, W.J. 1987. The truly disadvantaged. The inner city, the uncerclass, and public policy. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
Acknowledgments
The chapter is the result of work undertaken as part of the Subproject 7 of the research group BiKS (‘Bildungsprozesse, Kompetenzentwicklung und Selektionsentscheidungen im Vor- und Grundschulalter’—Educational Processes, Competence Development and Selection Decisions in Pre- and Elementary School Age) based at the University of Bamberg, Germany. It is funded by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation), project number BL 381/7-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneider, T. (2013). School Class Composition and Student Development in Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Domains: Longitudinal Analyses of Primary School Students in Germany. In: Windzio, M. (eds) Integration and Inequality in Educational Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6119-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6119-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6118-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6119-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)