Abstract
It is often supposed that the lower educational performance of ethnic minority students is related with language difficulties. The linguistically divided school systems in Estonia and Latvia enable to research the achievement of minority children who are studying in their mother tongue and explore how mathematical performance is related with individual social background, achievement motives and school context in such educational systems. The OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006 data is used to analyse mathematical performance of Russian-speaking and majority students. The results of multilevel analysis indicate that linguistically divided school systems in Estonia and Latvia have rather different outcomes. Latvian case shows that minority students experience no significant disadvantages irrespective of whether they attend Russian-medium or Latvianmedium schools. In Estonia, students who attend Russian-medium schools have lower performance than other students. This is partly explained by socio-economic composition of Russian-medium schools, indicating that children undergo difficulties due to their parental disadvantages. Additional reasons might be related to learning environments in these schools. However, Russian-speaking students in Estonian-medium schools also seem to lag behind majority students. Thus, the opportunity to study in the mother tongue might have only minor influence on educational achievement, while the school or learning context seem to be decisive factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
PISA 2006 data show that in Estonia, parental occupational position is higher for Russian-speakers in Estonian-medium schools than in Russian-medium schools, whereas no such difference is found in Latvia (analysis not presented here).
- 2.
Pupils were asked what language they speak at home most of the time, with the option to select only one language. Thus, it is impossible to identify bilingual families.
- 3.
PISA coding of parental education does not allow separation into the vocational and the general track of secondary education in Estonia and Latvia.
- 4.
Latvian PISA data indicates that the average test score of pupils in Riga and other urban areas is much higher compared to the test scores of pupils from rural areas. However, these regional disparities are largely conditioned by family background (Geske et al. 2006).
References
Aasland, A., and T. Fløtten. 2001. Ethnicity and social exclusion in Estonia and Latvia. Europe-Asia Studies 53(7): 1023–1049.
Bankston, C., and S. Caldas. 1996. Majority African American Schools and social injustice: The influence of De Facto Segregation on academic achievement. Social Forces 75(2): 535–555.
Boudon, R. 1974. Education, opportunity, and social inequality. Changing prospects in Western society. New York: Wiley.
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. 2010. Statistics Database. (http://www.csb.gov.lv/en).
Erikson, R., and J.O. Jonsson. 1996. Introduction. Explaining class inequality in education: The Swedish test case. In Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective, ed. R. Erikson, et al., 1–63. Boulder: Westview Press.
Esser, H. 2006. Migration, Language and Integration. AKI Research Review 4.
Greene, J.P. 1998. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of bilingual education. Claremont: Tomas Rivera Policy Institute.
Geske, A., A. Grīnfelds, I. Dedze, and Y. Zhang. 2006. Family background, school quality and rural-urban disparities in students learning achievement in Latvia. Prospects 4(4): 419–431.
Golubeva, M. 2010. Different history, different citizenship? Competing narratives and diverging civil enculturation in majority and minority schools in Estonia and Latvia. Journal of Baltic Studies 41(3): 315–329.
Hallik, K. 2002. Nationalising policies and integration challenges. In The challenge of Russian minority, ed. M. Lauristin, et al., 65–88. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Hallinan, M.T. 2005. Sørensen’s learning opportunities model: theoretical foundations, mathematical formalization, and empirical analysis. In Inequality: structures, dynamics, and mechanisms, essays in honour of Aage B. Sorensen, ed. A.L. Kalleberg, et al., 67–89. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd.
Hazans, M. 2010. Ethnic minorities in the Latvian labour market, 1997–2009: outcomes, integration drivers and barriers. In How integrated is Latvian society? An audit of achievement, failures and challenges, ed. N. Muižnieks, 125–159. Riga: University of Latvia Press.
Heath, A., and Y. Brinbaum. 2007. Guest editorial: Explaining ethnic inequalities in educational attainment. Ethnicities 7(3): 291–305.
Heath, A., C. Rothon, and E. Kilpi. 2008. The second generation in Western Europe: Education, unemployment, and occupational attainment. Annual Review of Sociology 34: 211–235.
Hogan-Brun, G. 2007. Language-in-education across the Baltic: Policies, practices and challenges. Comparative Education 43(4): 553–570.
Hogan-Brun, G., M.R. Uldis-Ozolins, and M. Rannut. 2007. Language politics and practices in the Baltic States. Current Issues in Language Planning 8(4): 469–631.
Hox, J. 2002. Multilevel analyses: techniques and applications. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jonsson, J.O., and F. Rudolphi. 2011. Weak performance—strong determination: school achievement and educational choice among children of immigrants in Sweden. European Sociological Review 27(4): 487–508.
Kao, G., and J.S. Thompson. 2003. Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology 29: 417–442.
Kao, G., and M. Tienda. 1998. Educational aspirations of minority youth. American Journal of Education 106(3): 349–384.
Kehris, I.B. and X. Landes. 2007. Multicultural Education in Latvia. Emilie – Reports on Education and Cultural Diversity in Europe. http://emilie.eliamep.gr/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/education-report-final-last.pdf.
Kogan, I. 2008. Education systems of central and Eastern European countries. In Europe enlarged: A handbook of education, labour and welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. I. Kogan, et al., 7–30. Bristol: Policy Press.
Leping, K.-O., and O. Toomet. 2008. Emerging ethnic wage gap: Estonia during political and economic transition. Journal of Comparative Economics 36(4): 599–619.
Levels, M., and J. Dronkers. 2008. Educational performance of native and immigrant children from various countries of origin. Ethnic and Racial Studies 31(8): 1404–1425.
Lindemann, K., and E. Saar. 2009. Non-estonians in the labour market. In Estonian human development report 2008, ed. M. Lauristin, 95–100. Tallinn: EestiKoostööKogu.
Loogma, K., V.-R. Ruus, L. Talts, and K. Poom-Valickis. 2009. Õpetaja professionaalsus ning tõhusama õpetamis- ja õppimiskeskkonna loomine. OECD TALIS tulemused. Tallinn: Tallinn University Centre of Educational Research.
Marks, G.N. 2005. Accounting for immigrant non-immigrant differences in reading and mathematics in twenty countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies 28(5): 925–946.
Mere, K., R. Priit, and T.M. Smith. 2006. Impact of SES on Estonian Students’ science achievement across different cognitive domains. Prospects XXXVI(4): 497–516.
Monakov, A., and S. Ševtšenko. 2003. Vene õppekeelega koolide üleminekust uuele õppekavale ja uutele matemaatikaõpikutele. In Koolimatemaatika 30, 51–54. Tartu: Tartu Ülikoolikirjastus.
NEQS—The National Examinations and Qualification Centre . 2010. Statistika. http://www.ekk.edu.ee/.
OECD. 2007a. PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world, volume 1: analysis. Paris: OECD.
OECD. 2007b. PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/30/62/39704344.xls.
OECD. 2009. PISA Data analysis manual. SPSS, 2nd ed. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. 2010. PISA 2009 results: What makes a school successful? Resources, policies and practices, vol. IV. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ogbu, J.U., and H.D. Simons. 1998. Voluntary and involuntary minorities: A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 29(2): 155–188.
Pavlenko, A. 2008. Multilingualism in post-Soviet countries: Language revival, language removal, and sociolinguistic theory. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 11(3&4): 275–314.
Platt, L. 2005. The intergenerational social mobility of minority ethnic groups. Sociology 39(3): 445–461.
Portes, A., and L. Hao. 2004. The schooling of children of immigrants: Contextual effects on the educational attainment of the second generation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 11920–11927.
Priedīte, A. 2005. Surveying language attitudes and practices in Latvia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26(5): 409–424.
Raudenbush, S.W., and A.S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage.
Rozenvalds, J. 2010. The Soviet heritage and integration policy development since the restoration of independence. In How integrated is Latvian society? An audit of achievement, failures and challenges, ed. N. Muižnieks, 33–60. Riga: University of Latvia Press.
Saar, E. 2008. Haridus. Uuringu Eesti ühiskonna integratsioonimonitooring 2008 Aruanne. http://www.meis.ee/raamatukogu.
Saar, E., and K. Lindemann. 2008. Estonia. In Europe enlarged: a handbook of education, labour and welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. I. Kogan, et al., 151–181. Bristol: Policy Press.
Schnepf, S.V. 2007. Immigrants’ educational disadvantage: an examination across ten countries and three surveys. Journal of Population Economics 20: 527–545.
Sørensen, A.B., and M.T. Hallinan. 1977. A Reconceptualisation of school effects. Sociology of Education 50(4): 273–289.
Statistics Estonia. 2010. Statistical Database. www.stat.ee.
Trapenciere, I. 2008. Latvia. In Europe enlarged: a handbook of education, labour and welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. I. Kogan, et al., 213–240. Bristol: Policy Press.
Van de Werfhorst, H., and F. van Tubergen. 2007. Ethnicity, schooling, and merit in the Netherlands. Ethnicities 7(3): 416–444.
Zepa, B., Oksana Žabko, and L. Vaivode. 2008. Language. Report. Riga: Baltic Institute of Social Sciences.
Zepa, B. 2010. Education for social integration. In How integrated is Latvian society? An audit of achievement, failures and challenges, ed. N. Muižnieks, 189–222. Riga: University of Latvia Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lindemann, K. (2013). The School Performance of the Russian-Speaking Minority in Linguistically Divided Educational Systems: A Comparison of Estonia and Latvia. In: Windzio, M. (eds) Integration and Inequality in Educational Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6119-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6119-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6118-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6119-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)