Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research pp 353–374Cite as

Social Networks and Causal Inference

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

This chapter reviews theoretical developments and empirical studies related to causal inference on social networks from both experimental and observational studies. Discussion is given to the effect of experimental interventions on outcomes and behaviors and how these effects relate to the presence of social ties, the position of individuals within the network, and the underlying structure and properties of the network. The effects of such experimental interventions on changing the network structure itself and potential feedback between behaviors and network changes are also discussed. With observational data, correlations in behavior or outcomes between individuals with network ties may be due to social influence, homophily, or environmental confounding. With cross-sectional data these three sources of correlation cannot be distinguished. Methods employing longitudinal observational data that can help distinguish between social influence, homophily, and environmental confounding are described, along with their limitations. Proposals are made regarding future research directions and methodological developments that would help put causal inference on social networks on a firmer theoretical footing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • An, W. (2011a). Models and methods to identify peer effects. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social network analysis (pp. 514–532). London: The Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, W. (2011b). Peer effects on adolescent smoking and social network-based interventions. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, W. (2011c). Instrumental variable estimates of peer effects. Working paper, Department of Sociology, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, W. (2011d). Algorithms for social network-based interventions and policies. Working paper, Department of Sociology, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, W. (2011e). On the directionality test of peer effects. Working paper, Department of Sociology, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos, A., Kumar, R., & Mahdian, M. (2008). Influence and correlation in social networks. In Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 7–15). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks, 29, 555–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Creating knowledge: Network structure and innovation. Available at http://www.socialnetworkanalysis.com/knowledge_creation.htm

  • Borgatti, S. P. (2006). Identifying sets of key players in a network. Computational, Mathematical and Organizational Theory, 12(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B. (2009). Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of Econometrics, 150(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1287–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1995). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2009). Alone in the crowd: The structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 977–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, O. D., & Robin, S. S. (1969). A social system analysis of preferred leadership role characteristics in high school. Sociology of Education, 42(3), 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo, B., Stinebrickner, R., & Stinebrickner, T. R. (2010). Interracial friendships in college (NBER Working Paper No. 15970). http://www.nber.org/papers/w15970.pdf

  • Campbell, R., Starkey, F., Holliday, J., Audrey, S., Bloor, M., Parry-Langdon, N., Hughes, R., & Moore, L. (2008). An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): A cluster randomised trial. Lancet, 371, 1595–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (2005). Model and methods in social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Centola, D. (2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329, 1194–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 2249–2258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Social contagion theory: Examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Statistics in Medicine 32(4), 556–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipollone, P., & Rosolia, A. (2007). Social interactions in high school: Lessons from an earthquake. The American Economic Review, 97(3), 948–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Cole, E., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Detecting implausible social network effects in acne, height, and headaches: Longitudinal analysis. British Medical Journal, 337, a2533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copic, J., Jackson, M. O., & Kirman, A. (2009). Identifying community structures from network data via maximum likelihood methods. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 9(1), Article 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, B. (2009). Good health and the bridging of structural holes. Social Networks, 31, 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1958). The planning of experiments. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawber, T. R. (1980). The Framingham study: The epidemiology of atherosclerotic disease. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, B. A., & Cranmer, S. J. (2012). Statistical inference for valued-edge networks: The generalized exponential random graph model. PLoS ONE, 1(7), e30136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, E., & Saez, E. (2003). The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 815–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1968). Peer influences on aspirations: A reinterpretation. The American Journal of Sociology, 74(2), 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, A., & Ichino, A. (2006). Clean evidence on peer effects. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinleib, M., Kannel, W. B., Garrison, R. J., McNamara, P. M., & Castelli, W. P. (1975). The Framingham offspring study: Design and preliminary data. Preventive Medicine, 4, 518–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Estimating peer effects on health in social networks. Journal of Health Economics, 27(5), 1386–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2010). Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 5334–5338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(12), 7821–7826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., & Airoldi, E. M. (2009). A survey of statistical network models. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 2, 129–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, B. (2008). Identifying social interactions through conditional variance restrictions. Econometrica, 76, 643–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halloran, M. E., & Struchiner, C. J. (1991). Study designs for dependent happenings. Epidemiology, 2, 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernán, M. A., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2011). Compound treatments and transportability of causal inference. Epidemiology, 22, 368–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudgens, M. G., & Halloran, M. E. (2008). Towards causal inference with interference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 832–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, G., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2006). Evaluating kindergarten retention policy: A case study of causal inference for multilevel observational data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 901–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M., & Levy, D. (2008). Peer effects and alcohol use among college students. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L.-f. (2009). Identification and estimation of spatial econometric models with group interactions, contextual factors and fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics, 140(2), 333–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, R. (2011). The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analyses. Statistics, Politics and Policy, 2(1), Article 2, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 531–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F. (2013). Identification of treatment response with social interactions. The Econometric Journal 16(1), S1–S23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J. (2001). Peer influence groups: Identifying dense clusters in large networks. Social Networks, 23, 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. L., & Sørensen, A. B. (1999). Parental networks, social closure, and mathematics learning: A test of Coleman’s social capital explanation of school effects. American Sociological Review, 64, 661–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. L., & Todd, J. J. (2009). Intergenerational closure and academic achievement in high school: A new evaluation of Coleman’s conjecture. Sociology of Education, 82(July), 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noel, H., & Nyhan, B. (2011). The ‘unfriending’ problem: The consequences of homophily in friendship retention for causal estimates of social influence. Social Networks, 33, 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohtsuki, H., Hauert, C., Lieberman, E., & Nowak, M. A. (2006). A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature, 441, 502–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, A. J., Elwert, F., Rosenquist, J. N., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Christakis, N. A. (2013). Estimating peer effects in longitudinal dyadic data using instrumental variables (Working Paper). Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, J. M., Traulsen, A., & Nowak, M. A. (2006). Coevolution of strategy and structure in complex networks with dynamical linking. Physical Review Letters, 97(25), 258103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R. (2007). Interference between units in randomized experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non-randomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1980). Comment on: ‘Randomization analysis of experimental data in the Fisher randomization test’ by D. Basu. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 591–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdote, B. (2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 681–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalizi, C. R., & Thomas, A. C. (2011). Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods and Research, 40, 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31, 361–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chap. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (2006). What do randomized studies of housing mobility demonstrate? Causal inference in the face of interference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 1398–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steglich, C. E., Snijders, T. A., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tchetgen, T., Eric, J., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2012). On causal inference in the presence of interference. Statistical Methods in Medical Research – Special Issue on Causal Inference, 21, 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W. (2005). Network models and methods for studying the diffusion of innovations. In P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 98–116). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W., & Davis, R. L. (1999). Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W., & Pumpuang, P. (2007). Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Education and Behavior, 34, 881–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W., Hoffman, B. R., Ritt-Olson, A., Lichtman, K., & Johnson, C. A. (2003). Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. American Journal of Public Health, 93(1), 1837–1843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele, T. J. (2011). Sensitivity analysis for contagion effects in social networks. Sociological Methods and Research, 40, 240–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele, T. J., & Arah, O. A. (2011). Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments and confounders. Epidemiology, 22, 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele, T. J., & Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J. (2011). Effect partitioning under interference for two-stage randomized experiments. Statistics and Probability Letters, 81, 861–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele, T. J., Ogburn, E. L., & Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J. (2012a). Why and when “flawed” social network analyses still yield valid tests of no contagion. Statistics, Politics, and Policy, 3, Article 4, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele, T. J., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J., & Halloran, M. E. (2012b). Components of the indirect effect in vaccine trials: Identification of contagion and infectiousness effects. Epidemiology, 23, 751–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vissa, B. (2011). A matching theory of entrepreneurs’ tie formation intentions and initiation of economic exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, R. R., & Jeffery, R. W. (1999). Benefits of recruiting participants with friends and increasing social support for weight loss and maintenance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(1), 132–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Stephen Morgan for helpful comments. This work was supported by NIH grant ES017876.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA

    Tyler J. VanderWeele

  2. Departments of Sociology and Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Weihua An

Authors
  1. Tyler J. VanderWeele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weihua An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tyler J. VanderWeele .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Sociology, Cornell University, Uris Hall 358, Ithaca, 14853, USA

    Stephen L. Morgan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

VanderWeele, T.J., An, W. (2013). Social Networks and Causal Inference. In: Morgan, S. (eds) Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation