Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning ((LARI,volume 1))

  • 1389 Accesses

Abstract

In this final part of the book several rules of discovery are considered, that is, non-deductive rules for finding hypotheses to solve problems. Of course, finding hypotheses is not a sufficient condition for discovery. The latter requires hypotheses to be plausible, and the plausibility test procedure of Chapter 4 involves operations beyond simple hypothesis formation. Nevertheless, finding hypotheses is a necessary condition for discovery and, in that sense, one may speak of rules of discovery. The latter are not a closed set, given once for all, but rather an open set which can always be extended as research develops. Each such extension is a development of the analytic method, which grows as new non-deductive rules are added. As Bacon says, “the art of discovery may grow with discoveries.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bacon (1961–1986, I, 223).

  2. 2.

    Pólya (1954, I, vi–vii).

  3. 3.

    Swetz and Kao (1977, 14).

  4. 4.

    Ibid.

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    Fuss (1843, I, 127 footnote).

  7. 7.

    Popper (2002, 18).

  8. 8.

    Popper (1972, 30).

  9. 9.

    Popper (2002, 20).

  10. 10.

    Ibid., 66.

  11. 11.

    Ibid., 67.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., 86.

  13. 13.

    Ibid., 85.

  14. 14.

    Ibid., 87.

  15. 15.

    Ibid., 88.

  16. 16.

    Carnap (1962, v).

  17. 17.

    Ibid., 206.

  18. 18.

    Ibid., v.

  19. 19.

    Carnap (1966, 34).

  20. 20.

    Salmon (1965b, 280).

  21. 21.

    Aristotle, Topica, A 18, 108 b 13–14.

  22. 22.

    See Archimedes (1880–81, I, 258.2–4).

  23. 23.

    Simplicius, In Aristotelis Physicorum Libros Quattuor Priores Commentaria (Diels), 54.20–22.

  24. 24.

    Ibid., 55.7–8.

  25. 25.

    Leibniz (1971, V, 181).

  26. 26.

    Proclus, In Primum Euclidis Elementorum Librum Commentarii (Friedlein), 157.20.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., 157.22–158.1.

  28. 28.

    Ibid., 158.1–2.

  29. 29.

    Herschel (2008, 73).

  30. 30.

    Aristotle, Poetica, 1457 b 22–23.

  31. 31.

    Ibid., 1457 b 23–24.

  32. 32.

    See Leibniz (1971, V, 182).

  33. 33.

    Rutherford (1911, 671).

  34. 34.

    Franklin (1859, II, 295).

  35. 35.

    Maxwell (1965, I, 377–378).

  36. 36.

    Mill (1963–1986, VII, 557).

  37. 37.

    Ibid.

  38. 38.

    Ibid., VII, 557–558.

  39. 39.

    Ibid.,VII, 558.

  40. 40.

    Kant (1992, 232).

  41. 41.

    Ibid.

  42. 42.

    Hume (2007, 26).

  43. 43.

    Ibid.

  44. 44.

    Ibid.

  45. 45.

    Mill (1963–1986, VII, 556).

  46. 46.

    Ibid., VII, 557.

  47. 47.

    Ibid.

References

  • Archimedes. 1880–81. Opera Omnia, ed. Johnan Ludvig Heiberg. Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 1961–1986. Works, ed. James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis, and Douglas Denon Heath. Stuttgart Bad Cannstatt: Frommann Holzboog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf. 1962. Logical foundations of probability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf. 1966. Philosophical foundations of physics. An introduction to the philosophy of science. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Benjamin. 1859. Memoirs. New York: Derby and Jackson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuss, Paul Heinrich (ed.). 1843. Correspondance mathématique et physique de quelques célebres géomètres du XVIIIème siècle. Saint Pétersbourg: Académie Impériale des Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, William. 2008. Letter to Sir Joseph Bank. In James Sime, William Herschel and his work, 73–74. Charleston: BiblioBazaar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 2007. An enquiry concerning human understanding, ed. Lewis Amherst Selby-Bigge and Peter Harold Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1992. Lectures on logic, ed. J. Michael Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1971. Mathematische Schriften, ed. Carl Immanuel Gerhardt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, James Clerk. 1965. Scientific papers, ed. William Davidson Niven. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. 1963–1986. Collected works, ed. John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, George. 1954. Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 1972. Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, Ernest. 1911. The scattering of α and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom. Philosophical Magazine 21: 669–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Wesley Charles. 1965b. Rejoinder to Barker and Kyburg. American Philosophical Quarterly 2: 277–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swetz, Frank J., and T.I. Kao. 1977. Was Pythagoras Chinese? An examination of right triangle theory in ancient China. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cellucci, C. (2013). Induction and Analogy. In: Rethinking Logic: Logic in Relation to Mathematics, Evolution, and Method. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6091-2_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics