Making Territory

  • Frederick SteinerEmail author
Part of the Urban and Landscape Perspectives book series (URBANLAND, volume 14)


We inhabit a vulnerable planet. The devastation caused by natural disasters such as the southern Asian and Japanese tsunami, Hurricanes Katrina and Ike in the United States, and the earthquakes in China’s Sichuan province, Haiti, and Turkey – as well as the ongoing depletion and degradation of the world’s natural resources caused by a burgeoning human population – has made it clear that “business as usual” is no longer sustainable. We need to find ways to improve how we live on this planet while minimizing our impact on it.

Landscape architecture and its subfield, landscape urbanism, have the potential to provide leadership to enable us to inhabit this vulnerable planet in a more sustainable manner. Seven key landscape urbanism axioms are presented: cities and landscapes change constantly; technology connects us to each other and our environments in new ways, changing how and where we live; sense of place and sense of region produce distinct cultural identities; certain regional identities foster creativity; landscape-based urban design involves one application of additive structure across several scales; design and planning disciplinary boundaries blur in landscape urbanism; and cities and landscapes are resilient ecosystems.


Additive structure City beautiful Ecology Fractals Incrementalism Landscape Landscape architecture Regionalism Resilience Territory 


  1. Almy D (ed) (2007) On landscape urbanism, vol 14, Center. Center for American Architecture and Design, University of Texas at Austin, AustinGoogle Scholar
  2. Beatley T (2004) Native to nowhere. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Botkin D (1990) Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Burdett R, Sudjic D (eds) (2007) The endless city. Phaidon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. DeLillo D (1997) Underworld. Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Gunderson L, Holling C, Pritchard L, Peterson G (2002) Resilience. In: Munn T (ed) Encyclopedia of global environmental change. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 530–531Google Scholar
  7. Lynch K (1958) Environmental adaptability. J Am Inst Plan 24:16–24 (Reprinted in Banerjee T, Southworth M (ed) (1990) City sense and city design: writings and projects of Kevin Lynch. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Maciocco G (2008) Fundamental trends in city development. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Mumford L (1938) The culture of cities. Secker and Warburg, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Pickett S, Cadenasso M (2003) Integrating the ecological, socioeconomic, and planning realms: insights from the Baltimore ecosystem study. In: Musacchio L, Wu J, Johnson T (eds) Pattern, process, scale, and hierarchy: advancing interdisciplinary collaboration for creating sustainable urban landscapes and communities. Arizona State University, Tempe, p 34Google Scholar
  11. Vale L, Campanella T (2005a) The city shall rise again: urban resilience in the wake of disaster. The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 14, B6–B9Google Scholar
  12. Vale L, Campanella T (2005b) The resilient city: how modern cities recover from disaster. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Vogt G (2006) Miniature and panorama, Vogt Landscape Architects Projects 2000–2006. Lars Müller, BadenGoogle Scholar
  14. Waldheim C (ed) (2006) The landscape urbanism reader. Princeton Architecture Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ArchitectureUniversity of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations