Advertisement

The [Loving] Metropolitan Landscape and the Public-Private Borderland: Refiguring the Field for Architecture, Landscape and Urban Design

  • Dorian WiszniewskiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Urban and Landscape Perspectives book series (URBANLAND, volume 14)

Abstract

This chapter promotes the city as integrated with its metropolitan landscape. It sees the city less as a series of architectural figures (autonomous works of art, technology and craftsmanship) on the common infrastructural ground of public space (museums, libraries, town halls, streets, squares and parks circumscribed by fields and transport systems) and more as the suspended animation of serial spatial practices negotiated across timeframes varying between the fleeting and the endless stretching out of the present. The corollaries to such a view are unpredictable, affirmatively uncertain, but not without confident commitment, clear architectural expression and evident territorial claims and differences.

This chapter encourages the recurrent critique of our old habits, especially those that precondition the relation between our cities and the landscapes within which they are arranged. The practices promoted through this chapter are premised on a deconstruction of our conventional legislative disciplinary approach to urban, landscape and architectural configuration. The recommendation is to nurture spatial practices that focus less on ends and more on means, not means as an end but means as “pure means”. The dynamics of the negotiated practices are interdisciplinary, procedural and elastic but also encouraging towards the development of specific disciplinary means that open, hold and further promote flexible reciprocity between means of production and the production of means that opportune the movement through and between territorial limits. This chapter promotes architectural, urban and landscape borderlands as affirmative conditions at scales that range between body and world.

Keywords

Borderland Dispositif Everyman’s land Globalisation Intersubjective procedure Metropolitan landscape No-man’s-land Private space Public space Social contract Sovereignty Territoriality Territory Urban design 

References

  1. Agamben G (1998) Homo sacer, sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Agamben G (2000) Means without end, notes on politics (trans: Binetti V, Casarino C). University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  3. Agamben G (2007) Metropolis (trans: Bove A, from Audio files). The European Graduate School, Leuk. http://www.egs.edu/faculty/giorgio-agamben/articles/metropolis/. Accessed 17 Mar 2007
  4. Allen S (1989) Piranesi’s “Campo Marzio”: an experimental design. Assemblage 10:70–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arendt H (1998) The human condition. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aristotle (1956) Metaphysics (trans: Warrington J). Everyman’s Library The Aldine Press, Letchworth, pp 223–244.Google Scholar
  7. Badiou A, Trong N (2012) In praise of love (trans: Bush P). Serpent’s Tail: Profile Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Bateson G (2000) Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhabha H (2005) The location of culture. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  10. Deleuze G (2001) Pure immanence, essays on a life (trans: Boyman A). Zone Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Foucault M (2001) Madness and civilisation, a history of insanity in the age of reason (trans: Howard R). Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Gold T (2012) For women in work this is a perfect storm of inequality. Guardian.co.uk, April 2, 22.00.Google Scholar
  13. Guattari F (2000) The three ecologies (trans: Pindar I, Sutton P). Athlone Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Habermas J, Cronin C, De Greiff P (eds) (2002) The inclusion of the other studies in political theory. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardt M, Negri A (2001) Empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Hegel GWF (2005) Philosophy of right (1820) (trans: Hyde SW). Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Heidegger M (2001) Building, dwelling, thinking. In: Poetry, language, thought (trans: Hofstadter A). Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. The Interactive Nolli Map of Rome Website - University of Oregon. http://nolli.uoregon.edu/
  19. Marx K (1978) The Grundrisse (The foundations of the critique into political economy, 1856). In: The Marx Engels reader. WW Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Plato, Sophist. The Internet Classics Archive. classics.mit.edu/Plato/sophist.htmlGoogle Scholar
  21. Popper K (2011) The open society and its enemies. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Rossi A (1984) Primary elements and the concept of area. In: The architecture of the city. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Rousseau JJ (2008) The social contract (trans: Betts C). Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Serres M (1989) China loam. Detachment (trans: James G, Federman R). Ohio State University Press, Columbus, pp 2–24Google Scholar
  25. Serres M (2008) The natural contract (trans: MacArthur E, Paulson W). University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  26. Virno P (2004) A grammar of the multitude. For an analysis of contemporary forms of life. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA/LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Wiszniewski D (2007) Borderlands in Istanbul: tectonics and the politics of gesture. Toplumbilim 22:185–208 (Yayin Kurulu Baskani (ed) May (October))Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.E S A L A, Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations