Skip to main content

Space for Plural Publics and Their Involvement: Reflections on Some Strategic Planning Experiences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover City Project and Public Space

Part of the book series: Urban and Landscape Perspectives ((URBANLAND,volume 14))

  • 2593 Accesses

Abstract

Some issues about uncertainties in the city project seem as they cannot be solved by architectural design, and some others seem they cannot be solved by land-use plans. Some have emerged during some strategic planning experiences led by the author in North Sardinia (Italy) in the last years: how to cope with different local, social, economic and institutional actors having different interests? How to involve all the ‘local publics’ in the process? What kind of demand these different ‘publics’ express? How to construct a shared – among these different actors – vision for future? How to implement it? Which is the relationship among the vision, the scenarios, the actions, the projects and programmes that emerge in strategic plans? And among these and the public space? How to make the ‘project community’ be more stable? Can a space for the different publics be helpful for it?

Rather than on participatory techniques, the chapter focuses on organisational and communicative structures that could support some ‘traditional’ planning approaches, facilitating not only the consensus building but also the implementation of strategies, plans, programs, actions and project emerged during the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arendt H (1958) The human condition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plan 35:216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender T (2006) The new metropolitanism and a pluralized public. In: Lenz G, Ulfers F, Dallmann A (eds) Toward a new metropolitanism. Universitätsverlag, Heidelberg, pp 53–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout F, Hertin J (2002) Foresight futures scenarios, developing and applying a participative strategic planning tool. Greener Manag Int 37:37–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Börjeson L, Höjer M, Dreborg K, Ekvall T, Finnveden G (2006) Scenario types and techniques: towards a user’s guide. Futures 38(7):723–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breheny M (1991) The renaissance of strategic planning? Environ Plan B: Plan Des 18(2):233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuhls K (2003) From forecasting to foresight processes – new participative foresight activities in Germany. J Forecast 22(2–3):93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Geus A (1988) Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review, Mar–Apr, pp 70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Espriella C (2007) Designing for equality: conceptualising a tool for strategic territorial planning. Habitat Int 31:317–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson EA, Weber KM (2009) Adaptive foresight: navigating the complex landscape of policy strategies. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 75(4):462–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahey L, Randall RM (1998) What is scenario learning? In: Fahey L, Randall RM (eds) Learning from the future: competitive foresight scenarios. Wiley, New York, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester J (1999) The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Frug GE (2001) City making, building communities without building walls. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (1989) Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1987) The theory of communicative action, vol 2. Beacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall T (2009) Stockholm: the making of a metropolis. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Halla F (2005) Critical elements in sustaining participatory planning: Bagamoyo strategic urban development planning framework in Tanzania. Habitat Int 29:137–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häußermann H, Simons K (1999) The new Berlin: growth scenarios and local strategies. Humboldt Universität Berlin, Institute of Social Sciences, Urban and Regional Sociology, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey P (1994) Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory. Town Plan Rev 63(2):143–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning: making frameworks for fragmented societies. Macmillan Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heracleous L (1998) Strategic thinking or strategic planning? Long Range Plan 31(3):481–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjortsø CN (2004) Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR: an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. Eur J Oper Res 152:667–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway DA (2004) Strategic planning and Habermasian informed discourse: reality or rhetoric. Crit Perspect Account 15:469–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway DA, De Reuck J (2001) Beyond a traditional budgeting orientation: towards a commitment to general decision assurance (GDA). In: Asia pacific interdisciplinary research in accounting conference, Adelaide, Australia, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes J (1996) Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. J Am Plan Assoc 62(4):460–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kekes J (1993) The morality of pluralism. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom C (1959) The science of muddling through. Public Adm Rev 19(2):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannermaa M (1986) Futures research and social decision making: alternative futures as a case study. Futures 18(5):658–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly M (2001) Spatial planning for urban infrastructure investment. A guide to training and practice. Development Planning Unit (DPU), UCL, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler DA (1994) Collaborative strategic thinking. Planning Review, Sept–Oct, pp 30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000) The reform of metropolitan governance. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/3/17/1918016.pdf

  • Pimbert MP, Pretty JN (1997) Diversity and sustainability in community based conservation. Unesco-IIPA, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romice O (2008) Glasgow. Some historical background on housing, current conditions, the role of communities in the regeneration of the city. In: Venti D (ed) Progettazione e Pianificazione partecipata. Metodi, strumenti, esperienze. INU, Roma, pp 365–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer AW (2005) Approaching scenario-based studies: three perceptions about the future and considerations landscape planning. Environ Plann B Plann Des 32(1):67–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer AW, Mouat DA, Bassett SD, Binford MW, Johnson CW, Saarinen JA (2006) Examining development-related uncertainties for environmental management: strategic planning scenarios in Southern California. Landsc Urban Plan 77:359–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1981) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Störmer E, Truffer B, Dominguez D, Gujer W, Herlyn A, Hiessl H, Ruef A (2009) The exploratory analysis of trade-offs in strategic planning: lessons from regional infrastructure foresight. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76:1150–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P (2004) Planning for a better future. UN-HABITAT. Habitat Debate 10(4):4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden K (1996) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wack P (1985) Scenarios: shooting the rapids. Harv Bus Rev 63(6):2–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang W-N, Clarke KC (2003) The use of scenarios in land-use planning. Environ Plann B Plann Des 30(6):885–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Casu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Casu, A. (2013). Space for Plural Publics and Their Involvement: Reflections on Some Strategic Planning Experiences. In: Serreli, S. (eds) City Project and Public Space. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6037-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6037-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6036-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6037-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics