Abstract
Some issues about uncertainties in the city project seem as they cannot be solved by architectural design, and some others seem they cannot be solved by land-use plans. Some have emerged during some strategic planning experiences led by the author in North Sardinia (Italy) in the last years: how to cope with different local, social, economic and institutional actors having different interests? How to involve all the ‘local publics’ in the process? What kind of demand these different ‘publics’ express? How to construct a shared – among these different actors – vision for future? How to implement it? Which is the relationship among the vision, the scenarios, the actions, the projects and programmes that emerge in strategic plans? And among these and the public space? How to make the ‘project community’ be more stable? Can a space for the different publics be helpful for it?
Rather than on participatory techniques, the chapter focuses on organisational and communicative structures that could support some ‘traditional’ planning approaches, facilitating not only the consensus building but also the implementation of strategies, plans, programs, actions and project emerged during the process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arendt H (1958) The human condition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plan 35:216–224
Bender T (2006) The new metropolitanism and a pluralized public. In: Lenz G, Ulfers F, Dallmann A (eds) Toward a new metropolitanism. Universitätsverlag, Heidelberg, pp 53–72
Berkhout F, Hertin J (2002) Foresight futures scenarios, developing and applying a participative strategic planning tool. Greener Manag Int 37:37–52
Börjeson L, Höjer M, Dreborg K, Ekvall T, Finnveden G (2006) Scenario types and techniques: towards a user’s guide. Futures 38(7):723–739
Breheny M (1991) The renaissance of strategic planning? Environ Plan B: Plan Des 18(2):233–249
Cuhls K (2003) From forecasting to foresight processes – new participative foresight activities in Germany. J Forecast 22(2–3):93–111
De Geus A (1988) Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review, Mar–Apr, pp 70–74
de la Espriella C (2007) Designing for equality: conceptualising a tool for strategic territorial planning. Habitat Int 31:317–332
Eriksson EA, Weber KM (2009) Adaptive foresight: navigating the complex landscape of policy strategies. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 75(4):462–482
Fahey L, Randall RM (1998) What is scenario learning? In: Fahey L, Randall RM (eds) Learning from the future: competitive foresight scenarios. Wiley, New York, pp 3–21
Forester J (1999) The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston
Frug GE (2001) City making, building communities without building walls. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Gray B (1989) Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Habermas J (1987) The theory of communicative action, vol 2. Beacon, Boston
Hall T (2009) Stockholm: the making of a metropolis. Routledge, London
Halla F (2005) Critical elements in sustaining participatory planning: Bagamoyo strategic urban development planning framework in Tanzania. Habitat Int 29:137–161
Häußermann H, Simons K (1999) The new Berlin: growth scenarios and local strategies. Humboldt Universität Berlin, Institute of Social Sciences, Urban and Regional Sociology, Berlin
Healey P (1994) Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory. Town Plan Rev 63(2):143–162
Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning: making frameworks for fragmented societies. Macmillan Press, London
Heracleous L (1998) Strategic thinking or strategic planning? Long Range Plan 31(3):481–487
Hjortsø CN (2004) Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR: an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. Eur J Oper Res 152:667–683
Holloway DA (2004) Strategic planning and Habermasian informed discourse: reality or rhetoric. Crit Perspect Account 15:469–483
Holloway DA, De Reuck J (2001) Beyond a traditional budgeting orientation: towards a commitment to general decision assurance (GDA). In: Asia pacific interdisciplinary research in accounting conference, Adelaide, Australia, pp 1–29
Innes J (1996) Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. J Am Plan Assoc 62(4):460–472
Kekes J (1993) The morality of pluralism. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Lindblom C (1959) The science of muddling through. Public Adm Rev 19(2):79–88
Mannermaa M (1986) Futures research and social decision making: alternative futures as a case study. Futures 18(5):658–670
Mattingly M (2001) Spatial planning for urban infrastructure investment. A guide to training and practice. Development Planning Unit (DPU), UCL, London
Nadler DA (1994) Collaborative strategic thinking. Planning Review, Sept–Oct, pp 30–31
OECD (2000) The reform of metropolitan governance. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/3/17/1918016.pdf
Pimbert MP, Pretty JN (1997) Diversity and sustainability in community based conservation. Unesco-IIPA, India
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169
Romice O (2008) Glasgow. Some historical background on housing, current conditions, the role of communities in the regeneration of the city. In: Venti D (ed) Progettazione e Pianificazione partecipata. Metodi, strumenti, esperienze. INU, Roma, pp 365–371
Shearer AW (2005) Approaching scenario-based studies: three perceptions about the future and considerations landscape planning. Environ Plann B Plann Des 32(1):67–87
Shearer AW, Mouat DA, Bassett SD, Binford MW, Johnson CW, Saarinen JA (2006) Examining development-related uncertainties for environmental management: strategic planning scenarios in Southern California. Landsc Urban Plan 77:359–381
Simon HA (1981) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Störmer E, Truffer B, Dominguez D, Gujer W, Herlyn A, Hiessl H, Ruef A (2009) The exploratory analysis of trade-offs in strategic planning: lessons from regional infrastructure foresight. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76:1150–1162
Taylor P (2004) Planning for a better future. UN-HABITAT. Habitat Debate 10(4):4–5
van der Heijden K (1996) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. Wiley, New York
Wack P (1985) Scenarios: shooting the rapids. Harv Bus Rev 63(6):2–14
Xiang W-N, Clarke KC (2003) The use of scenarios in land-use planning. Environ Plann B Plann Des 30(6):885–909
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Casu, A. (2013). Space for Plural Publics and Their Involvement: Reflections on Some Strategic Planning Experiences. In: Serreli, S. (eds) City Project and Public Space. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6037-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6037-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6036-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6037-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)