Abstract
Usually ethical and political-philosophical discussions do not involve a discussion of aesthetics. The latter is understood as being concerned with matters of beauty and taste, whereas ethics is seen as being about right and wrong or about good and virtue. Yet in this chapter, I will argue that when it comes to evaluating vulnerability transformations and indeed when it comes to thinking about what kinds of humans we want to be, such a sharp distinction between ethics and aesthetics is unfruitful for two main reasons. First, the aesthetics of vulnerability is normative in various ways and therefore deserves its place within a normative anthropology of vulnerability broadly conceived. Second, ethics itself, and therefore also the ethics of vulnerability, can be understood as a kind of art. Thus, it is not only the case that normative anthropology is ‘also’ about beauty; I will argue that it is also and crucially about coping with vulnerability as an art, understood in the sense of a craft or technè, which requires skills. There is not only an extrinsic but also an intrinsic connection between ethics and aesthetics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
I refer to several senses to counter the contemporary obsession with sight and hearing alone. Levinas is very contemporary in that sense.
- 4.
For example, Koert van Mensvoort has suggested that we could use other things (in our surroundings) as media, such as fountains, plants, or other elements of our environment. See http://www.koert.com/work/
- 5.
Note also the connection with post-Aristotelian ‘good life’ ethics. For example, Epicureans and Stoics had their view on how we should cope with our vulnerability.
- 6.
Kaplan has argued that in the West technology seems ‘fundamental for defining what humans are’ (Kaplan 2004), but we can generalise this to all cultures—which does not mean that there are no cultural differences with regard to this issue. As said, in the West, we seem to have chosen the ‘via negativa’, but it seems that there are other cultures, for example, in the East, which have different anthropologies.
References
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2002. Liberation and passion. Alfter/Bonn: Denkmal Verlag.
Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2010. Artificial companions: Empathy and vulnerability mirroring in Human-Robot relations. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4(3). Available at http://www.bepress.com/selt/vol4/iss3/art2/
De Mul, Jos. 2006. De domesticatie van het noodlot: De wedergeboorte van de tragedie uit de geest van de technologie. Kampen: Klement.
Descartes, René. 1637. Discours de la méthode. Trans. L.J. Lafleur. Discourse on method. In Discourse on method and meditations. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1960.
Kaplan, Frédéric. 2004. Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of Robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 1(3): 465–480.
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1843. Either/or: A fragment of life, vol. 1. Trans. D.F. Swenson and L.M. Swenson. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944.
Kurzweil, Ray. 2005. The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking/Penguin.
Mori, Masahiro. 1970. The uncanny valley. Trans. K.F. MacDorman and T. Minato. Energy 7(4):33–35.
Sloterdijk, Peter. 2005. Im Weltinnenraum des Kapitals. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coeckelbergh, M. (2013). Normative Aesthetics of Vulnerability: The Art of Coping with Vulnerability. In: Human Being @ Risk. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6025-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6025-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6024-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6025-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)