Skip to main content

Scientific Writing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Epidemiology: Principles and Practical Guidelines

Abstract

The core focus of scientific research surrounds the achievement of new knowledge, a consensus line of thinking that rests on a collective body of evidence. Research-based evidence is considered hidden or incomplete until it is made accessible to the relevant audience. The process of effectively communicating is an art which, when practiced and honed, should increase awareness of and insight into the scientific knowledge-base of public health. Chapter 30 will describe principles and guidelines for communication to a variety of stakeholders. However, communication to scientists specifically has evolved as a separate art with its own principles and practical conventions. The present chapter aims to provide an introduction to the art of scientific writing, the primary form of dissemination to other members of the research community, with practical advice for selected types of it.

The ill and unfit choice of words wonderfully obstructs the understanding.

Francis Bacon

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alley M (1996) The craft of scientific writing, 3rd edn. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, pp 1–273. ISBN 0387947663

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baguma S, Anandajayasekeram P, Puskur R (2010) Writing convincing research proposals and effective scientific reports. Part B: scientific writing. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhopal RS (2002) Concepts of epidemiology: integrating the ideas, theories, principles and methods of epidemiology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–472. ISBN 0199543143

    Google Scholar 

  • CONSORT statement. http://www.consort-statement.org/home. Accessed Sept 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Day R, Gastel B (2008) How to write and publish a scientific paper, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–72. ISBN 9780521671675

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorland’s illustrated medical dictionary (2011) 32nd edn. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 1–2176. ISBN 9781416062578

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg MB (2008) Field epidemiology, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–572. ISBN 9780195313802

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall GM (2008) How to write a paper, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–122. ISBN 9781405167734

    Google Scholar 

  • ICMJE (2011) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: authorship and contributorship. http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html. Accessed Sept 2012

  • Lilleyman JS (1995) How to write a scientific paper–a rough guide to getting published. Arch Dis Child 72(3):268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen OS (2011a) Epidemiological research: terms and concepts. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–175. ISBN 9789400711709

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen OS (2011b) Up from clinical epidemiology & EBM. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–175. ISBN 9789048195008

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moher D et al (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 354(9193):1896–1900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neill US (2007) How to write a scientific masterpiece. J Clin Invest 117:3599–3602

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porta M, Greenland S, Last JM (2008) A dictionary of epidemiology. A handbook sponsored by the I.E.A., 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–289. ISBN 9780195314496

    Google Scholar 

  • Reference Manager (2012) www.refman.com/. Accessed Sept 2012

  • Reuters, ENDNOTE Thomson (2011) Endnote X4. Thomson Reuters, New York. http://www.endnote.com. Accessed Sept 2012

  • STROBE statement (2009) http://www.strobe-statement.org/. Accessed Sept 2012

  • Strunk W, White EB, Angell R (1999) The elements of style, 4th edn. Longman, New York, pp 1–105. ISBN 0205313426

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WM et al (1987) Scientific presentation: what to do and what not to do. Invest Radiol 22(3):244–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toft CA, Jaeger RG (1998) Writing for scientific journals I: the manuscript. Herpetologica 54:42–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolever P (1980) How to write a scientific paper. Bios 51:12–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cora Grant MPH .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grant, C., Van den Broeck, J. (2013). Scientific Writing. In: Van den Broeck, J., Brestoff, J. (eds) Epidemiology: Principles and Practical Guidelines. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5989-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5989-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5988-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5989-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics